Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:46:53.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Judicial Independence and Opinion Clarity on State Supreme Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Greg Goelzhauser*
Affiliation:
Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
Damon M. Cann
Affiliation:
Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
*
Greg Goelzhauser, Department of Political Science, Utah State University, 0725 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322, USA. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

We contribute to the literature on judicial independence and performance in the states by analyzing opinion clarity. Written opinions are the primary means of communication for state supreme court justices, and clarity is a core component of judicial performance. Using automated text analysis on a sample of state supreme court opinions from all 50 states, we find that variation in judicial retention systems is not associated with substantively meaningful differences in opinion clarity. Furthermore, elected judges do not seem to produce clearer opinions in salient cases notwithstanding the increased public visibility of those decisions. These results suggest that judges tend to conform to prevailing professional norms despite differing institutional pressures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldisert, Ruggero J., Rasch, Meehan, and Bartlett, Matthew P.. 2009. “Opinion Writing and Opinion Readers.” Cardozo Law Review 31:144.Google Scholar
Alozie, Nicholas O. 1988. “Black Representation on State Judiciaries.” Social Science Quarterly 69 (4): 979–86..Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Griffin B. 1966. “Style in Judicial Writing.” Journal of Public Law 15:214–19.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Daniel M., and Clay, Karen. 2006. “The Effect of Judicial Independence on Courts: Evidence from the American States.” Journal of Legal Studies 35 (2): 399400..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science 42:327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Ryan C., Treul, Sarah A., Johnson, Timothy R., and Goldman, Jerry. 2011. “Emotions, Oral Arguments, and Supreme Court Decision Making.” Journal of Politics 73:572–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, Chris. 2004. “Patterns of Campaign Spending and Electoral Competition in State Supreme Court Elections.” Justice System Journal 25:2138.Google Scholar
Bonneau, Chris. 2005. “Electoral Verdicts: Incumbent Defeats in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Politics Research 33:818–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, Chris, and Hall, Melinda G.. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Boyea, Brent D.. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 52:360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, Langer, Laura, and Hall, Melinda G.. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges.” Journal of Politics 62:387413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, Yates, Jeff, and Boyea, Brent D.. 2012. “Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts.” Law & Society Review 46:497522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown v. Board of Education II, 349 U.S. 294. 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Damon M. 2007. “Beyond Accountability and Independence: Judicial Selection and State Court Performance.” Judicature 90:226–32.Google Scholar
Cann, Damon M., and Wilhelm, Teena. 2011. “Case Visibility and the Electoral Connection in State Supreme Courts.” American Politics Research 39:557–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Stephen J., Mitu Gulati, G., and Posner, Eric A.. 2010. “Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected Rather than Appointed Judiciary.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 26:290336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S., and Carrubba, Clifford J.. 2012. “A Theory of Opinion Writing in a Political Hierarchy.” Journal of Politics 74:584603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, Daniel. 2005. “Measuring Gubernatorial Ideology: A Content Analysis of State of the State Speeches.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5:88103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Coleman, Brady, and Phung, Quy. 2010. “The Language of Supreme Court Briefs: A Large-scale Quantitative Investigation.” Journal of Appellate Practice & Process 11:75103.Google Scholar
Collins, Paul M. Jr. 2008. Friends of the Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, Pamela C., Collins, Paul M. Jr., and Calvin, Bryan. 2011. “Lower Court Influence on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content.” Journal of Politics 71:3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Olive J. 1961. “Multiple Comparisons among Means.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 56:5264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmert, Craig F., and Glick, Henry R.. 1988. “The Selection of State Supreme Court Justices.” American Politics Quarterly 16:445–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farber, Daniel A. 2005. “Supreme Court Selection and Measures of Past Judicial Performance.” Florida State University Law Review 32:1175–96.Google Scholar
Faul, Franz, Erdfelder, Edgar, Buchner, Axel, and Lang, Albert-Georg. 2009. “Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses.” Behavior Research Methods 41:1149–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finn, Seth. 1985. “Unpredictability as Correlate of Reader Enjoyment of News Articles.” Journalism Mass Communication Quarterly 62:334–45.Google Scholar
Flesch, Rudolph. 1948. “A New Readability Yardstick.” Journal of Applied Psychology 32:221–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, Bryan A. 2002. The Elements of Legal Style. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
George, Joyce J. 2006. The Judicial Opinion Writing Handbook. 5th ed. New York: William S. Hein.Google Scholar
Geyh, Charles. 2003. “Why Judicial Elections Stink.” Ohio State Law Journal 64:4379.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1978. “Judges' Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive Model.” American Political Science Review 72:911–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2012. Electing Judges: The Surprising Effects of Campaigning on Judicial Legitimacy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Henry, and Emmert, Craig. 1987. “Selection Systems and Judicial Characteristics: The Recruitment of State Supreme Court Justices.” Judicature 70:228–35.Google Scholar
Goelzhauser, Greg. 2011. “Diversifying State Supreme Courts.” Law Society Review 45:761–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goelzhauser, Greg. 2012. “Accountability and Judicial Performance: Evidence from Case Dispositions.” Justice System Journal 33:249–61.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, Jona. 1994. “Merit Selection: Current Status, Procedures, and Issues.” University of Miami Law Review 49:1126.Google Scholar
Hall, Melinda G. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” Journal of Politics 49:1117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda G. 1995. “Justices as Representatives: Elections and Judicial Politics in the American States.” American Politics Quarterly 23:485503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda G. 2001. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review 95:315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda G. 2007. “Competition as Accountability in State Supreme Court Elections.” In Running for Judge, ed. Streb, Matthew. New York: New York University Press. Pp. 165–85.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, Mark S., and Lanier, Drew N.. 2003. “Explaining Judicial Diversity: The Differential Ability of Women and Minorities to Attain Seats on State Supreme and Appellate Courts.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3:329–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, Mark S., and Lanier, Drew N.. 2008. “Diversity in State and Federal Appellate Courts: Change and Continuity across 20 Years.” Justice System Journal 29:4770.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Louis. 1992. “Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis.” Duke Law Journal 42:557629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Laura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Law, David S., and Zaring, David. 2010. “Law versus Ideology: The Supreme Court and the Use of Legislative History.” William and Mary Law Review 51:1653–747.Google Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Cameron, Charles M.. 2007. “Bargaining and Opinion Assignment on the US Supreme Court.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 23:276302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebovits, Gerald. 2004. “Free at Last from Obscurity: Clarity—Part 2.” New York Bar Association Journal 76: 64.Google Scholar
Lowrey, Tina M. 2006. “The Relation between Script Complexity and Commercial Memorability.” Journal of Advertising 35:715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, William P. 2004. “Be Careful What You Wish For: The Problems with Using Empirical Rankings to Select Supreme Court Justices.” Southern California Law Review 78:119–36.Google Scholar
Milne, George R., Culnan, Mary J., and Greene, Henry. 2006. “A Longitudinal Assessment of Online Privacy Notice Readability.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 25:238–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Michael J. 2013. “Elections and Explanations: Judicial Elections and the Readability of Judicial Opinions.” Working Paper available online at http://mjnelson.wustl.edu/research.html.Google Scholar
Owens, Ryan J., and Wedeking, Justin P.. 2011. “Justices and Legal Clarity: Analyzing the Complexity of U.S. Supreme Court Opinions.” Law & Society Review 45:1027–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, Ryan J., Wedeking, Justin, and Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. 2013. “How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review.” Journal of Law and Courts 1:3559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1993. “What Do Judges Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does).” Supreme Court Economic Review 3:141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2005. “Judicial Behavior and Performance: An Economic Approach.” Florida State University Law Review 32:1259–79.Google Scholar
Reilly, Shauna, and Richey, Sean. 2011. “Ballot Question Readability and Roll-off: The Impact of Language Complexity.” Political Research Quarterly 64:5967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Nicholas, Aggarwal, Raj, and Gibson, Charles. 1991. “Financial Reporting by Japanese Firms on the NYSE: An Analysis of Linguistic Content.” Management Information Review 31:233–51.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Nicholas, and Gibson, Charles. 1990. “Readability of Management's Discussion and Analysis.” Accounting Horizons 4:7887.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B. 2005. “A Tournament of Virtue.” Florida State University Law Review 32:13651400.Google Scholar
Spriggs, James F. II. 1997. “Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions.” Political Research Quarterly 50:567–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2008. “Measuring the Professionalization of U.S. State Courts of Last Resort.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2010. Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Romero, Alexia. n.d. “Clarity and Compliance in the Inter-American Human Rights System.” Working Paper available online at http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_26179.pdf.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Vanberg, Georg. 2008. “The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions.” American Journal of Political Science 52:514–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Joseph Jr., and Heck, Edward V.. 1987. “Caseloads and Controversies: A Different Perspective on the Overburdened U.S. Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal 12:370–83.Google Scholar
Terris, Fay. 1949. “Are Poll Questions Too Difficult?Public Opinion Quarterly 13:314–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Spelliscy, Ciara, Chase, Monique, and Greenman, Emma. 2008. Improving Judicial Diversity. New York: Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School.Google Scholar
Vickrey, William C., Denton, Douglas G., and Jefferson, Wallace B.. n.d. Opinions as the Voice of the Court: How State Supreme Courts Can Communicate Effectively and Promote Procedural Fairness. Williamsburg, VA. National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Vining, Richard L. Jr., and Wilhelm, Teena. 2011. “Measuring Case Salience in State Courts of Last Resort.” Political Research Quarterly 64:559–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Patricia M. 1995. “Rhetoric of Results and the Results of Rhetoric.” University of Chicago Law Review 62:1371–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanderer, Nancy A. 2002. “Writing Better Opinions: Communicating with Candor, Clarity, and Style.” Maine Law Review 54:4770.Google Scholar
Wandersee, James H., and Clary, Renee M.. 2007. “Learning the Trail: A Content Analysis of a University Arboretum's Exemplary Interpretive, Science Signage System.” American Biology Teacher 69:1623.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Micah. 2010. “Measuring Governors' Political Orientations Using Words as Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10:96109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wydick, Richard C. 2005. Plain English for Lawyers. 5th ed. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Yates, Jeff, Tankersley, Holley, and Brace, Paul. 2010. “Assessing the Impact of State Judicial Structures on Citizen Litigiousness.” Political Research Quarterly 63:797810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar