Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T20:57:55.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Public Election Funding Create More Extreme Legislators? Evidence from Arizona and Maine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Seth E. Masket  and
Michael G. Miller
Seth E. Masket
Affiliation:
University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
Michael G. Miller*
Affiliation:
Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
*
Michael G. Miller, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027-6598, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate whether Maine and Arizona's Clean Elections laws, which provide public funding for state legislative candidates, are responsible for producing a new cadre of legislators who are unusually ideologically extreme. We find that there is essentially no important difference in the legislative voting behavior of “clean” funded legislators and traditionally funded ones in either Arizona or Maine: those who are financed by private donors are no more or less ideologically extreme than those who are supported by the state. This finding calls into question some concerns about the effects on polarization of money generally and public funding in particular.

Keywords

campaign financepolitical behaviorelection rulesparties and electionsparties and interest groupsparties in legislatureslegislative behaviorroll call votinglegislative politics
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 24 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, Scott. 2006. “Campaign Finance and Voter Welfare with Entrenched Incumbents.” American Political Science Review 100 (1): 55–68..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bafumi, Joseph, and Herron, Michael C.. 2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 519–42..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Michael. 2014. “Political Ideology, Campaign Contributions, and Legislative Polarization.” Ph.D. diss., Princeton University.Google Scholar
Baron, David P. 1994. “Electoral Competition with Informed and Uniformed Voters.” American Political Science Review 88 (1): 33–47..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2013. “Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 294–311..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 367–86..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2006. “The Behavior and Success of Latino Legislators: Evidence from the States.” Social Science Quarterly 87 (5): 1136–57..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, Susan M. 2011. “Update: LePage Tells NAACP to ‘Kiss My Butt.‘” The Portland Press Herald, January 14. Accessed August 2012 from http://www.pressherald.com/2011/01/14/lepage-tells-naacp-to-kiss-my-butt/Google Scholar
Ensley, Michael J. 2009. “Individual Campaign Contributions and Candidate Ideology.” Public Choice 138:221–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francia, Peter L., Green, John C., Herrnson, Paul S., Powell, Lynda W., and Wilcox, Clyde. 2005. “Limousine Liberals and Corporate Conservatives: The Financial Constituencies of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Social Science Quarterly 86 (4): 761–78..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francia, Peter L., and Herrnson, Paul. 2003. “The Impact of Public Finance Laws in Fundraising in State Legislative Elections.” American Politics Research 31 (5): 520–39..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, David. 2013. “How Big Money Created the Most Polarized Congress in a Century: 5 Charts.” The Atlantic, July 9. Accessed December 8, 2012 from http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/07/how-big-money-created-the-most-polarized-congress-in-a-century-5-charts/277611/Google Scholar
Hall, Andrew B. 2015. “How the Public Funding of Elections Increases Candidate Polarization.” Unpublished manuscript. Accessed from https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/11481940/Hall_publicfunding.pdfGoogle Scholar
Heberlig, Eric, Hetherington, Marc, and Larson, Bruce. 2006. “The Price of Leadership: Campaign Money and the Polarization of Congressional Parties.” Journal of Politics 68 (4): 992–1005..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, Helios, Levine, David K., and Martinelli, Cesar. 2008. “Policy Platforms, Campaign Spending and Voter Participation” Journal of Public Economics 92 (3–4): 501–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jan, Tracy. 2013. “For Freshman in Congress, Focus is on Raising Money.” Boston Globe, May 12. Accessed December 8, 2014 from http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2013/05/11/freshman-lawmakers-are-introduced-permanent-hunt-for-campaign-money/YQMMMoqCNxGKh2h0tOIF9H/story.htmlGoogle Scholar
King, Aaron, Orlando, Frank, and April, David Sparks. 2011. “Ideological Extremity and Primary Success: A Social Network Approach.” Presented at the annual conference of the Midwest Political Science Association in Chicago.Google Scholar
Klein, Ezra. 2013. “Big Money Corrupts Washington. Small Donors Polarize It.” Wonkblog, The Washington Post, May 10. Accessed December 8, 2014 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/10/big-money-corrupts-washington-small-donors-polarize-it/Google Scholar
Law and Border. n.d. Accessed from http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/zpomqm/law—borderGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Steven D. 1994. “Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign Spending on Election Outcomes in the U.S. House.” Journal of Political Economy 102:777–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malbin, Michael J. 2013. “Small Donors: Incentives, Economies of Scale, and Effects.” The Forum 11 (3): 385–411..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masket, Seth E. 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, and Poole, Keith T.. 1998. “An Empirical Spatial Model of Congressional Campaigns.” Political Analysis 7 (1): 1–30..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Kevin. 2012. “Olympia Snow Quits Senate Race.” The Bangor Daily News, February 29. Accessed August 2012 from http://bangordailynews.com/2012/02/28/politics/olympia-snowe-quits-senate-race/Google Scholar
Miller, Michael G. 2008. “Gaming Arizona: Public Money and Shifting Candidate Strategies.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41 (3): 527–32..Google Scholar
Miller, Michael G. 2011a. “After the GAO Report: What Do We Know about Public Election Funding?” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 10 (3): 273–90..Google Scholar
Miller, Michael G. 2011b. “Public Money, Candidate Time, and Electoral Outcomes in State Legislative Elections.” In Public Financing in American Elections, ed. Panagopoulos, Costas. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Michael G. 2014. Subsidizing Democracy: How Public Funding Changes Elections, and How It Can Work in the Future. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Poggione, Sarah. 2004. “Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators' Policy Preferences.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (2): 305–14..Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rainey, Carlisle. 2014. “Arguing for a Negligible Effect.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 1083–91..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccardi, Nicholas. 2010. “Fleeing Phoenix Out of Fear of Immigration Law.” Los Angeles Times, July 22. Accessed August 2012 from http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/22/nation/la-na-immigration-phoenix-20100723/2Google Scholar
Richardson, John. 2012. “Analysis Shows Congress Shifting Toward Extremes.” Portland Press Herald, March 4. Accessed August 2012 from http://www.pressherald.com/2012/03/04/analysis-shows-congress-shifting-toward-extremes-_2012-03-04/Google Scholar
Shor, Boris. 2014. “How U.S. State Legislatures Are Polarized and Getting More Polarized (in 2 graphs).” The Monkey Cage, The Washington Post, January 14. Accessed November 2014 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/01/14/how-u-s-state-legislatures-are-polarized-and-getting-more-polarized-in-2-graphs/Google Scholar
Shor, Boris, and McCarty, Nolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 530–51..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, W. J., and Simas, E. N.. 2010. “Candidate Valence and Ideological Positions in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 371–88..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2003. “CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Journal of Statistical Software. Accessed November 2014 from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v08/i01/paperCrossRefGoogle Scholar