Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:37:36.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accountability in a Federal System: The Governor, the President, and Economic Expectations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Abstract

How do people hold elected officials accountable for expected economic conditions in a system of government in which jurisdiction and responsibility are divided such as they are in the United States? Due to the president's visibility, people may hold all elected officials of the president's party responsible for economic conditions. Or, people may be able to differentiate between state and national economic conditions and jurisdictional responsibilities and hold governors of either party accountable for state economic conditions. I use ordered probit to analyze a pooled model of 13 individual-level mid-1990s Michigan opinion surveys and find no evidence that individuals consistently rely on a presidency-centered referenda model of cognition when evaluating the state's governor. Instead, gubernatorial performance ratings reflect an incumbent-centered accountability model. The evidence also suggests jurisdictional accountability, where gubernatorial evaluations are influenced by state economic expectations, but not by national economic expectations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1984. “National Issues, Strategic Politicians, and Voting Behavior in the 1980 and 1982 Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 28:710721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1985. “Economic Conditions, Presidential Popularity, and Voting Behavior in Midterm Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 47:3143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1988. “Explaining Senate Election Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 82:385403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Segal, Jeffery A.. 1986. “Determinants of the Outcomes of U. S. Senate Elections.” Journal of Politics 48:433439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., Lanoue, David J., and Ramesh, Subha. 1988. “Economic Conditions, Causal Attributions, and Political Evaluations in the 1984 Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics 50:848863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Greg D., and Squire, Peverill. N.d. “A Note on the Dynamics and Idiosyncrasies of Gubernatorial Popularity.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Partin, Randall W.. 1995. “Economic and Referendum Voting: A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 89:99107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyle, Thad L. 1999. State and Local Government 1999-2000. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Books, John, and Prysby, Charles. 1999. “Contextual Effects on Retrospective Economic Evaluations: The Impact of the State and Local Economy.” Political Behavior 21:116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, William P., and VerBurg, Kenneth. 1995. Michigan Politics and Government: Facing Change in a Complex State. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., and Wright, Gerald C.. 1998. “State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42:9941002; “Rejoinder.” 1008-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, John E. 1988. “Institutions, the Economy, and the Dynamics of State Elections.” American Political Science Review 82:133154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., and Stewart, Marianne C.. 1994. “Prospections, Retrospections, and Rationality: The ‘Bankers’ Model of Presidential Approval Reconsidered.” American Journal of Political Science 38:11041123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E. 1983. “Gubernatorial Popularity in Nine States.” American Politics Quarterly 11:219235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David E.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Crew, Robert E., and Weiher, Gregory R.. 1996. “Gubernatorial Popularity in Three States: A Preliminary Model.” Social Science Journal 33:3955.Google Scholar
Donahue, John D. 1996. Disunited States. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Durr, Robert H., Gilmour, John B., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 1997. “Explaining Congressional Approval.” American Journal of Political Science 41:175207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1989. “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote.” American Political Science Review 83:567573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1978. “Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections: A Microanalysis.” American Journal of Political Science 22:426443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gormley, William T. Jr. 1979. “Coverage of State Government in the Mass Media.” State Government 52:4647.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 1989. “Flashlight Coverage: State News on National Broadcasts.” American Politics Quarterly 17:278289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 1993. “Swiss Cheese Journalism.” State Government News 36:1921.Google Scholar
Grady, Dennis O. 1989. “Governors and Economic Development Policy: The Perception of Their Role and the Reality of Their Influence.” Policy Studies Journal 17:879894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Susan B. 1999. “‘Life is Not Fair’: Governors' Job Performance Ratings and State Economies.” Political Research Quarterly 52:167188.Google Scholar
Hedge, David M. 1998. Governance and the Changing American States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hembroff, Larry A., and Silver, Brian D.. 1995-98. Methodological Report: Michigan State University's State of the State Survey. Vol. II-XV. East Lansing, MI: Institute for Public Policy and Social Research, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Howell, Susan E., and Vanderleeuw, James M.. 1990. “Economic Effects on State Governors.” American Politics Quarterly 18:158168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1993. “Citizens, Contexts, and Politics.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. Finifter, Ada. Washington DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
James, Patrick, and Rioux, Lean Sebastien. 1998. “International Crises and Linkage Politics: The Experiences of the United States, 1953-1994.” Political Research Quarterly 51:781812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, Patrick J. 1983. “The Effect of State Economic Conditions on the Vote for Governor.” Social Science Quarterly 64:154162.Google Scholar
Kenney, Patrick J., and Rice, Tom W.. 1983. “Popularity and the Vote: The Gubernatorial Case.” American Politics Quarterly 11:237241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1961. Public Opinion and Democracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. 5th ed. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Roderick Kiewiet, D.. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23:498527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Roderick Kiewiet, D.. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11:129161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., Adams, Gordon S., and Gronke, Paul W.. 1989. “Economics and Politics in the 1984 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 33:491515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kone, Susan L., and Winters, Richard F.. 1993. “Taxes and Voting: Electoral Retribution in the American States.” Journal of Politics 55:2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levernier, William. 1991. “The Effect of Relative Economic Performance on the Outcome of Gubernatorial Elections.” Public Choice 74:181190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Rice, Tom W.. 1985. “Are Senate Election Outcomes Predictable?PS 18:745754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyden, Kevin M., and Borrelli, Stephen A.. 1995. “The Effect of State Economic Conditions on Gubernatorial Elections: Does Unified Government Make a Difference?Political Research Quarterly 48:275290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Jason, and Sigelman, Lee. 1999. “Public Assessments of Gubernatorial Performance.” American Politics Quarterly 27:201215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U. S. Economy.” American Political Science Review 86:597611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, James. 1961. “The Federalist 51.” In The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, Clinton. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
Markus, Gregory B. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 32:137154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Niemi, Richard G., Fan, David P., and Amato, Timothy. 1999. “Elite Economic Forecasts, Economic News, Mass Economic Judgments, and Presidential Approval.” Journal of Politics 61:109135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 1993a. Classics in Voting Behavior. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 1993b. Controversies in Voting Behavior. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Stanley, Harold W., and Vogel, Ronald J.. 1995. “State Economies and State Taxes: Do Voters Hold Governors Accountable?American Journal of Political Science 39:936957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partin, Randall W. 1995. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 23:8195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 1990. “Standing Up for Congress: Variations in Public Esteem Since the 1960s.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15:2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1987. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections.” American Economic Review 7:293297.Google Scholar
Romero, David W., and Stambough, Stephen J.. 1996. “Personal and Economic Well-Being and the Individual Vote for Congress: A Pooled Analysis, 1980-1990.” Political Research Quarterly 49:607616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Dennis M. 1989. “Presidents, Governors, and Electoral Accountability.” Journal of Politics 51:286304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Eric R. A. N. 1989. The Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill, and Fastnow, Christina. 1992. “Comparing Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 47:705721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Robert M. 1990. “Economic Voting for Governor and U. S. Senator: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism.” Journal of Politics 52:2952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svoboda, Craig J. 1995. “Retrospective Voting in Gubernatorial Elections: 1982 and 1986.” Political Research Quarterly 48:135150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Clive S., and Hrebenar, Ronald J.. 1999. “Interest Groups in the States.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, 7th ed., eds. Gray, Virginia, Hanson, Russell L., and Jacob, Herbert. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Tidmarch, Charles M., Hyman, Lisa J., and Sorkin, Jill E.. 1984. “Press Issue Agendas in the 1982 Congressional and Gubernatorial Election Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 46:12261242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections in the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Gerald. 1997. “Contextual Models of Electoral Behavior: The Southern Wallace Vote.” American Political Science Review 71:497508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar