Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:06:42.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Power of Brand: Beyond Interest Group Influence in U.S. State Abortion Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Brian Robert Calfano
Brian Robert Calfano*
Affiliation:
Missouri State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I examine whether a constituency's political brand—defined here as the reputation that white evangelicals and Catholics have for “pro-life” abortion policy—influences the public abortion position taken by members in six U.S. state Houses of Representatives. At issue is whether constituent political brand functions as a non-interest group influence on state legislators. A fitting of the brand literature to the state politics domain suggests that the effect of political brand might be dependent on constituent presence in a state House district—be it the relative size of the constituency or its organizational (church-based) cohesion. Results confirm the influence of constituent political brand and point to white evangelicals as having an influence on a member's abortion position based on the size and homogeneity of their constituency. Catholics possess brand influence as well, but theirs is powered by the church's organizational—parish—presence and cohesion in U.S. state House districts. These findings suggest that the two major “pro-life” constituencies in American politics are able to leverage brand in the political realm in ways that the literature has not previously considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , Fall 2010 , pp. 227 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaker, David A. 1991. Managing Brand Equity. New York, NY: The Free Press, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41:718–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M., and Stewart, Charles III. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45:136–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2002. “Direct Democracy and the Link Between Public Opinion and State Abortion Policy.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4:372–87.Google Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bentley, Arthur F. 1908. The Process of Government. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burns, Gene. 1992. “Commitments and Non-Commitments: The Social Radicalism of U.S. Catholic Bishops.” Theory and Society 21:703–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, Timothy. 1991. Catholic Bishops in American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, Timothy. 1993. “The Politics of the American Catholic Hierarchy.” Political Science Quarterly 108:497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camobreco, John F., and Barnello, Michelle A.. 2008. “Democratic Responsiveness and Policy Shock: The Case of State Abortion Policy.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 8:48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren D., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 74:78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelli, Jim. 1987. “A Tale of Two Cultures.” Notre Dame Magazine 15:33–4.Google Scholar
Charles, Rodger. 1999. An Introduction to Catholic Social Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Peter B., and Wilson, James Q.. 1961. “Incentive Systems: A Theory of Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 6:129–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collie, Melissa, and Brady, David. 1985. “The Decline of Party Voting Coalitions in the House of Representatives.” In Congress Reconsidered 3rd ed. Eds., Dodd, Lawrence and Oppenheimer, Bruce. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Matthew D.. 2004. Setting the Agenda. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A. 2000. “Religious Brand Loyalty and Political Loyalties.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 39:78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dye, Thomas R. 1971. “State Legislative Politics.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, 2nd ed. Eds., Jacob, Herbert and Vines, Kenneth N.. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fabrizio, Paul. 2001. “Evolving into Morality Politics: U.S. Catholic Bishops' Statements on U.S. Politics from 1792 to the Present. In The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed., Mooney, Christopher Z.. New York, NY: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Farquhar, Peter H. 1989. “Managing Brand Equity.” Marketing Research 1:24–33.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Finke, Roger, and Scheitle, Christopher P.. 2005. “Accounting for the Unaccounted: Computing Correctives for the 2000 RCMS Data.” Review of Religious Research 47:5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Robert Booth, Hertzke, Allen D., and Olson, Laura R.. 1999. Religion and Politics in American: Faith, Culture, and Strategic Choices, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Frolich, Norman, Oppenheimer, Joe A., and Young, Oran R.. 1971. Political Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1966. “Reputation and Resources in Community Politics.” American Journal of Sociology 72:121–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamson, William A. 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, Ill: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Gay, David, and Lynxwiler, John. 1999. “The Impact of Religiosity on Race Variations in Abortion Attitudes.” Sociological Spectrum 19:359–378.Google ScholarPubMed
Green, John C., and Guth, James L.. 1991. “Religion, Representatives, and Roll Calls.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:571–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grugel, Jean. 2002. Democratization: A Critical Introduction. New York, NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hall, Elaine J., and Ferree, Myra Marx. 1986. “Race Differences in Abortion Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50:193–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 1999. The Federalist Papers, ed., Rossiter, Clinton. New York, NY: New American Library.Google Scholar
Hansen, Susan B. 1993. “Differences in Public Policies Toward Abortion: Electoral and Policy Context.” In Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, ed. Goggin, Malcolm L.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S. 1998. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Hojnacki, Marie. 1998. “Organized Interests' Advocacy Behavior in Alliances.” Political Research Quarterly 51:437–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John E., and Kingdon, John W.. 1992. “Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 36:805–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelen, Ted G. 2003. “Catholic Priests and the Political Order: The Political Behavior of Catholic Pastors.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42:591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelen, Ted G. 2004. “Roman Catholic Priests.” In Corwin E. Smidt, ed. Pulpit and Politics: Clergy in American Politics at the Advent of the Millennium. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O. 2001. “Professional Reputation and the Neustadt Formulation.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 31:281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Dale E., Doty, Sherri, Grammich, Clifford, Horsch, James E., Houseal, Richard, Lynn, Mac, Marcum, John P., Sanchagrin, Kenneth M., and Taylor, Richard H.. 2002. Religious Congregations and Membership in the United States 2000: An Enumeration by Region, State, and County Based on Data Reported for 149 Religious Bodies. Nashville, Tennessee: Glenmary Research Center.Google Scholar
Karnes, Kimberly, McIntosh, Wayne, Morris, Irwin L., and Pearson-Merkowitz, Shanna. 2007. “Mighty Fortresses: Explaining the Spatial Distribution of American Megachurches.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46:261–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Kevin Lane. 1993. “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Marketing Customer-Based Brand Loyalty.” Journal of Marketing 57:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Jonathan, Evans, M.D.R., and Headey, Bruce. 1993. “Moral Reasoning and Political Conflict: The Abortion Controversy.” British Journal of Sociology 44:589–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmen's Voting Decisions, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
Kirmani, Amna. 1990. “The Effect of Perceived Advertising Cost on Brand Perceptions.” The Journal of Consumer Research 17:160–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1993. “Social Movements, Political Parties, and Democratic Theory.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528:13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroszner, Randall S., and Stratmann, Thomas. 1998. “Interest-Group Competition and the Organization of Congress: Theory and Evidence from Financial Services' Political Action Committees.” American Economic Review 88:1163–87.Google Scholar
Leege, David C., and Kellstedt, Lyman A., eds. 1993. Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Lugo, Luis, Smith, Gregory, Cox, Dan, and Pond, Allyson. 2008. A Portrait of American Catholics on the Eve of Pope Benedict's Visit. Washington, DC: Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974a. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974b. “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals.” Polity 6:295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullen, Mike. 1994. “Religious Polities as Institutions.” Social Forces 73:709–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medoff, Marshall H. 2002. “The Determinants and Impact of State Abortion Restrictions.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 61:481–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NARAL: National Abortion Rights Action League. 2001. Who Decides? A State-by-State Review of Abortion Rights. Washington, DC: National Abortion Rights Action League.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Norrander, Barbara, and Wilcox, Clyde. 2001. “Public Opinion and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy.” In The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed., Mooney, Christopher Z.. New York, NY: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Norrander, Barbara. 2001. “Measuring State Public Opinion with the Senate National Election Study.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1:111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nownes, Anthony J., and Freeman, Patricia. 1998. “Interest Group Activity in the States.” The Journal of Politics 60:86–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, Karen. 1996. No Neutral Ground? Abortion Politics in an Age of Absolutes. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Robert, and Berkman, Michael. 1995. “Religious Determinants of State Abortion Policy.” Social Science Quarterly 76:447–59.Google Scholar
Oldmixon, Elizabeth Anne. 2005. Uncompromising Positions: God, Sex, and the U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rozell, Mark J., and Wilcox, Clyde, eds. 1995. God at the Grass Roots: The Christian Right in the 1994 Elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1969. “An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 8:1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherrod, Patricia. 2002. “We are a People of Life: Opportunities and Challenges for a Prolife Parish.” Life and Learning XII. Washington, DC: University Faculty for Life.Google Scholar
Smidt, Corwin. 1988. “Evangelicals within Contemporary American Politics: Differentiating between Fundamentalist and Non-Fundamentalist Evangelicals.” Western Political Quarterly 41:601–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17:69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, and Sniderman, Paul. 2004. “Constraint in Mass Belief Systems: Political Brand Names as Signals.” Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Truman, David B. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., Owen, Dennis E., and Hill, Samuel S. Jr. 1988. “Churches as Political Communities.” American Political Science Review 82:531–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D. 2003. Religion and Politics in the United States, 4th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., and Calhoun-Brown, Allison. 2007. Religion and Politics in the United States, 5th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wetstein, Matthew E., and Albritton, Robert B.. 1995. “Effects of Public Opinion on Abortion Policies and Use in the American States.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 25:91–105.Google ScholarPubMed
Wetstein, Matthew W. 1996. Abortion Rates in the United States: The Influence of Opinion and Policy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, and Larson, Karin. 2006. Onward Christian Soldiers? The Religious Right in American Politics, 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Yamane, David. 2005. The Catholic Church in State Politics: Negotiating Prophetic Demands and Political Realities. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Yamane, David, and Oldmixon, Elizabeth. 2006. “Religion in the Legislative Arena: Affiliation, Salience, Advocacy, and Public Policymaking.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31:433–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar