Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T01:03:12.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immigration Crackdown in the American Workplace: Explaining Variation in E-Verify Policy Adoption Across the U.S. States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Benjamin J. Newman ,
Christopher D. Johnston ,
April A. Strickland  and
Jack Citrin
Benjamin J. Newman*
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA
Christopher D. Johnston
Affiliation:
Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
April A. Strickland
Affiliation:
Stony Brook University, NY, USA
Jack Citrin
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, USA
*
Benjamin J. Newman, Department of Political Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Immigration remains a powerful and recurrent feature of American politics. Of the issues related to immigration, controversy over government policy for controlling illegal immigration occupies a central position in the debate. One increasingly important and prevalent type of control policy that has received little scholarly attention is worksite employment eligibility enforcement, otherwise known as E-Verify Laws. In the present article, we analyze variation in E-Verify policy adoption across the U.S. states, approaching the topic from multiple theoretical perspectives and testing several hypotheses pertaining to policy enactment. Our analysis points to the critical role of proportionate change in a state's immigrant population, as well as the political activity of immigrant-employing industries, in leading to policy adoption. Despite the use of multiple objective indicators, we fail to find strong evidence supporting the hypothesis that economic distress within a state increases its likelihood of enacting E-Verify legislation. Overall, our analysis contributes to an underdeveloped area of immigration policy research and sheds light on an important contemporary immigration issue, while drawing broader conclusions concerning the factors influencing the emergence of anti-immigration policies more generally.

Keywords

immigration policyE-Verifystate politics
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 160 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 2007. Change and Continuity in the 2004 and 2006 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Al, Alexseev Mikhail. 2006. “Ballot-Box Vigilantism? Ethnic Population Shifts and Xenophobic Voting in Post-Soviet Russia.” Political Behavior 28 (3): 211–40..Google Scholar
Berry, John W. 1970. “Marginality, Stress, and Ethnic Identification in an Acculturated Aboriginal Community.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1 (3): 239–52..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, John W. 1997. “Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation.” Applied Psychology: An International Review 46 (1): 5–68..Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russel L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-1993.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 327–48..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. 1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: JohnWiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1958. “Race Prejudice As A Sense of Group Position.” Pacific Sociological Review 1:3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence D. 1988. “Prejudice as Group Position: Microfoundations of a Sociological Approach to Racism and Race Relations.” Journal of Social Issues 55 (3): 445–72..Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S.. 1997. “Time is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1414–61..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Peter, and Gimpel, James G.. 2000. “Economic Insecurity, Prejudicial Stereotypes, and Public Opinion on Immigration Policy.” Political Science Quarterly 115 (2): 201–25..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce E., Roderick Kiewiet, D., and Uhlaner, Carole J.. 1991. “The Acquisition of Partisanship by Latino and Asian Americans.” American Journal of Political Science 35 (2): 390–422..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calavita, Kitty. 1992. Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration, and the I.N.S. New Orleans, LA: Quid Pro Books.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea L., Wong, Cara, and Citrin, Jack. 2006. “‘Racial Threat’, Partisan Climate, and Direct Democracy: Contextual Effects in Three California Initiatives.” Political Behavior 28 (2): 129–50..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1965. “Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives” (Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 13:283–311). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Carter, David B., and Signorino, Curtis S.. 2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.” Political Analysis 18 (3): 271–92..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, Vanessa S. 2003. Acculturation and Psychological Adaptation. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, Reingold, Beth, and Green, Donald P.. 1990. “American Identity and the Politics of Ethnic Change.” Journal of Politics 52 (4): 1124–54..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack, Reingold, Beth, Walters, Evelyn, and Green, Donald P.. 1990. “The ‘Official English’ Movement and the Symbolic Politics of Language in the United States.” The Western Political Quarterly 43 (3): 535–59..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack, Green, Donald P., Muste, Christopher, and Wong, Cara. 1997. “Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.” Journal of Politics 59 (3): 858–81..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Feldman, Stanley. 1981. “The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (4): 617–45..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A., and Rosenblum, Marc R.. 2005. “Immigration and Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 8:99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frendreis, John, and Tatalovich, Raymond. 1997. “Who Supports English-Only Language Laws? Evidence From the 1992 National Election Study.” Social Science Quarterly 78:354–68.Google Scholar
Furnham, Adrian, and Bochner, Stephan. 1986. Culture Shock: Psychological Reactions to Unfamiliar Environments. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Gimpel, James G., and Edwards, James R.. 1998. The Congressional Politics of Immigration Reform. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Strolovitch, Dara Z., and Wong, Janelle S.. 1998. “Defended Neighborhoods, Integration, and Racially Motivated Crime.” American Journal of Sociology 104(2): 372–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hero, Rodney E., and Preuhs, Robert R.. 2007. “Immigration and the Evolving American Welfare State: Examining Policies in the U.S. States.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 498–517..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, M. V., and Morris, Irwin L.. 1997. “Amigo o enemigo? Context, Attitudes, and Anglo Public Opinion toward Immigration.” Social Science Quarterly 78 (2): 7813–9..Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J. 2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review 104 (1): 40–60..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, John. 1995. The Politics of Diversity: Immigration, Resistance, and Change in Monterey Park, California. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: A.A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Jacoby, William G., Norpoth, Helmut, and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Immigration Law Center (NILC). 2008. The History of Basic Pilot/E-Verify. Accessed from http://www.immigrationworksusa.org/uploaded/file/NILC%20e-verify-history-2008-10-17.pdfGoogle Scholar
Novack, Janet. 2007. “Who's Gonna Do the Work.” Forbes 1 (October): 36–8.Google Scholar
Oberg, Kalervo. 1960. “Culture Shock: Adjustment to New Cultural Environments.” Practical Anthropology 7:177–82.Google Scholar
Park, Elena, and Friedman, Debra S.. 2008. “E-Verify for Federal Contractors and Subcontractors Required Starting January 15, 2009.” Labor and Employment Alert: News Concerning Recent Labor and Employment Issues (Cozen O'Connor). http://www.cozen.com/admin/files/publications/Labor111708.pdf (accessed September 28, 2010).Google Scholar
Passel, Jeffrey S. 2006. The Size and Characteristics of the Unauthorized Migrant Population in the U.S. Research Report of the Pew Hispanic Center.Google Scholar
Redfield, Robert, Linton, Ralph, and Herskovits, Melville J.. 1936. “Memorandum on the Study of Acculturation.” American Anthropologist 38 (1): 149–52..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schildkraut, Deborah J. 2001. “Official English and the States: Influences on Declaring English the Official Language in the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (2): 445–57..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O. 1993. “Symbolic Politics: A Socio-Psychological Theory.” In Explorations in Political Psychology (Duke Studies in Political Psychology), eds. Iyengar, Shanto and McGuire, William J.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Huddy, Leonie. 1987. “The Symbolic Politics of Opposition to Bilingual Education.” Conflict Between People and Peoples, ed. Worchel, Stephan and Simpson, Jeffrey A.. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Sherif, Muzafer. 1966. Group Conflict and Cooperation: Their Social Psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
SiskindSusser Immigration Lawyers. “The ABC's of Immigration: E-Verify.” Siskind's Immigration Bulletin, June 27, 2008. Accessed September 28, 2010 from http://www.visalaw.com/08jun3/2jun308.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Carmines, Edward G.. 1997. Reaching Beyond Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, L. 2001. “Globalization, the State, and the Creation of Flexible Indigenous Workers: Mixtec Farmworkers in Oregon.” Working paper, The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies at UC San Diego.Google Scholar
Suttles, Gerald D. 1972. The Social Construction of Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tatalovich, Raymond. 1995. Nativism Reborn? The Official English Language Movement and the American States. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Ward, Michael D., Greenhill, Brian D., and Bakke, Kristin M.. 2008. “The perils of policy by p-value: Predicting civil conflicts.” Journal of Peace Research 47(4): 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zolberg, Artistide R. 1990. “Reforming the Back Door: The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 in Historical Perspective.” Immigration Reconsidered: History, Sociology, and Politics, ed. McLaughlin, Virginia-Yans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar