Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:41:10.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Redistricting Principles and Practices Affect U.S. State Legislative Electoral Competition?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Richard Forgette ,
Andrew Garner  and
John Winkle
Richard Forgette
Affiliation:
University of Mississippi
Andrew Garner
Affiliation:
University of Wyoming
John Winkle
Affiliation:
University of Mississippi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Critics of U.S. congressional and state legislative redistricting have argued that gerrymandering severely undermines electoral competitiveness to the point of violating constitutional equal protection standards. In this article, we evaluate whether redistricting principles and processes have any measurable consequence on state legislative electoral competition. In addition to their substantive importance, state legislative general election contests provide greater variance than congressional data for empirically assessing theoretical propositions regarding redistricting principles and processes. We find that electoral competitiveness in state legislative races declined throughout the 1990s, even after term limit reforms were implemented. The proportion of uncontested state legislative seats has doubled since the 1970s, and there has also been a slight increase in average margin of election district victory. Our results show that political principles and some traditional, “politically-neutral” redistricting principles significantly decrease the probability of uncontested state legislative elections. In contrast, independent redistricting commissions did not appear to affect state legislative competition. We conclude with a discussion of how our findings relate to the redistricting reform debate.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , Summer 2009 , pp. 151 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan. 1983. “Partisan Redistricting and the 1982 Congressional Elections.” The Journal of Politics 45:767–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan, Alexander, Brad, and Gunning, Matthew. 2006. Party Lines: Competition, Partisanship, and Congressional Redistricting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Altman, Micah. 1999. “Modeling the Effect of Mandatory District Compactness on Partisan Gerrymanders.” Political Geography 17:989–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabas, Jason, and Jerit, Jennifer. 2004. “Redistricting Principles and Racial Representation.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4:415–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Berkman, Michael B., and Schneiderman, Stuart. 2000. “Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries.” American Political Science Review 94:859–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, Richard. 1985. “Partisan Intentions and Election Day Realities in the Congressional Districting Process.” American Political Science Review 79:305–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunell, Thomas L. 2006. “Rethinking Redistricting: How Drawing Districts Packed with Partisans Improves Representation and Attitudes Towards Congress.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39:77–85.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Cain, Bruce. 1991. Congressional Redistricting: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives. New York, NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, MacDonald, Karin, and McDonald, Michael. 2005. “From Equality to Fairness: The Path of Political Reform since Baker v. Carr.” In Party Lines: Competition, Partisanship, and Congressional Redistricting, eds., Mann, Thomas and Cain, Bruce E.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 2000. “Incumbency and the Probability of Reelection in State Legislative Elections.” The Journal of Politics 62:671–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., Berry, William D., Niemi, Richard G., Powell, Lynda W., and Snyder, James M.. 2008. “State Legislative Election Returns, 1967–2003 [Computer file].” ICPSR21480-v1. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina [producer], 2007. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributer], 2008–04–22. doi: 10.3886/ICPSR21480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Adam B. 2006. “Designing Redistricting Institutions.” Election Law Journal 5:412–24.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Katz, Jonathan. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox v. Larios, 542 U.S. 947 (2004).Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1972. “Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes.” American Political Science Review 66:1234–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1977. “On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 71:166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1989. Congress, Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Forgette, Richard, and Platt, Glenn. 2005. “Redistricting Principles and Incumbency Protection,” Political Geography 24:924–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, David. 2002. “Ruining the House.” The New York Times. November 13, A29.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Sam. 2003. “The United States House of Unrepresentatives: What Went Wrong in the Latest Round of Redistricting.” Election Law Journal 2:179–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Sam, and Mann, Thomas E.. 2005. “For Election Reform, a Heartening Defeat.” The New York Times, November 11.Google Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel. 2002. “Gerrymandering and Political Cartels.” Harvard Law Review 116:620–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel, and Pildes, Richard H.. 1998. “Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process.” Stanford Law Review 50:643–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Breaux, David. 1991. “Southern Primary and Electoral Competition and Incumbent Success.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 14:129–43.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U.S. 526 (1969).Google Scholar
League of United Latin American Citizens, et al. v. Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, et al., 549 U.S. 399 (2006).Google Scholar
Mahan v. Howell, 410 U.S. 315 (1973).Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas, and Cain, Bruce. 2005. “Don't Blame Redistricting for Uncompetitive Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39:87–90.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael. 2007. “Regulating Redistricting.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 40:675–9.Google Scholar
Monmonier, Mark. 2001. Bushmanders and Bullwinkles. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrill, Richard. 1981. Political Redistricting and Geographic Theory. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.Google Scholar
Murphy, Dean. E. 2005. “Who Should Redistrict?” The New York Times, October 23.Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures Reapportionment Task Force. 1999. Redistricting Law 2000. Denver, CO: NCSL.Google Scholar
National Institute on Money in State Politics. 2006. “State Ballot Measures, 2005.” www.policyarchive.org/bitstream/handle/10207/5834/200609281.pdf (September 28, 2006).Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard, Grofman, Bernard, Carlucci, Carl, and Hofeller, Thomas. 1990. “Measuring Compactness and the Role a Compactness Standard in a Test for Partisan and Racial Redistricting.” The Journal of Politics 52:1155–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard, Jackman, Simon, and Winsky, Laura. 1991. “Candidacies and Competitiveness in Multimember Districts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orfield, Myron. 2002. American Metropolitics: The New Suburban Reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Primo, David M., Jacobsmeier, Matthew L., and Milyo, Jeffrey. 2007. “Estimating the Impact of State Policies and Institutions with Mixed-Level Data.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7:446–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg Political Report. 2005. “2005 Statewide Ballot Initiative Results.” http://rothenbergpoliticalreport.blogspot.com (November 11, 2005).Google Scholar
Rush, Mark E. 2000. Does Redistricting Make A Difference? Partisan Representation and Electoral Behavior. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1997. “Another Look at Legislative Professionalization in the California Assembly.” The Journal of Politics 5:1026–54.Google Scholar
Toobin, Jeffrey. 2003. “The Great Election Grab: When Does Gerrymandering Become a Threat to Democracy?” The New Yorker, December 8.Google Scholar
Vieth, Richard, et. al v. Robert C. Jubelirer, President of the Pennsylvania et al., 541 U.S. 267; 124 (2004).Google Scholar
Weber, Ronald E. 1995. “Redistricting and the Courts: Judicial Activism in the 1990's,” American Politics Quarterly 23:204–28.Google Scholar
Weber, Ronald E. 2005. “State Legislative Redistricting in 2003–2004: Emerging Trends and Issues in Reapportionment,” The Book of the States 37:116–24.Google Scholar
Webster, Gerald R. 2004a. “Representation, Geographic Districting, and Social Justice.” Journal of Geography 103:111–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, Gerald R. 2004b. “Evaluating the Geographic Compactness of Representational Districts.” In WorldMinds: Geographic Perspectives on 100 Problems, eds., Janelle, Donald G., Warf, Barney, and Hansen, Kathy. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. White v. Regester, 412 U.S. 755 (1973).Google Scholar