Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:10:18.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Status-Relevant Experiences and Conspicuous Consumption – the Moderating Role of Prenatal Androgen Exposure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2016

Gert Cornelissen  and
Javier Palacios-Fenech
Gert Cornelissen*
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Spain)
Javier Palacios-Fenech
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Gert Cornelissen. Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Economics and Business. Barcelona (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we study consumers’ interest in acquiring and displaying expensive luxury products. Based on recent insights in consumer psychology, which build on developments in evolutionary biology, we consider luxury products as “costly signals”: wasteful and costly goods, whose purpose is to communicate one’s biological fitness, and social status, to others. In line with previous research, we show that experiences that trigger mate attraction goals (Study 1: Exposure to others in bathing outfit) or status display goals (Study 2: Experiencing a vicarious victory of one’s favorite sports team) can increase people’s interest in luxury products. However, we demonstrate that some individuals are predictably more responsive to those experiences than others. We used a physiological measure (the proportion of the length of the index finger and ring finger of the right hand, 2D:4D) as a proxy for individual differences in exposure to prenatal androgens (i.e., testosterone). This measure has been related to dominant and competitive behavior later in life. We predict and find that individuals with a low 2D:4D (i.e., high exposure to prenatal androgens) were more responsive to the status-relevant experiences: they became more interested in luxury goods after these experiences. This was not the case for high 2D:4D individuals.

Keywords

androgen exposureconsumerluxurysocial status
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 19 , 2016 , E54
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.007 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellezza, S., Gino, F., & Keinan, A. (2014). The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 35–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/674870 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, P. C., Dabbs, J. M. Jr, Fielden, J. A., & Lutter, C. D. (1998). Testosterone changes during vicarious experiences of winning and losing among fans at sporting events. Physiology & Behavior, 65(1), 59–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(98)00147-4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boone, J. L. (1998). The evolution of magnanimity. Human Nature, 9(1), 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12110-998-1009-y CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, A., Shelley, G., Mazur, A., Tharp, G., & Kittok, R. (1989). Testosterone, and winning and losing in human competition. Hormones and Behavior, 23, 556–571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0018-506X(89)90042-1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, W. M., Hines, M., Fane, B. A., & Breedlove, S. M. (2002). Masculinized finger length patterns in human males and females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormones and Behavior, 42, 380–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.2002.1830 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, D. (2005). Dominance, status, and social hierarchies. The handbook of evolutionary psychology. (pp. 676–697). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Drèze, X., & Nunes, J. C. (2009). Feeling superior: The impact of loyalty program structure on consumers’ perceptions of status. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 890–905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/593946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenegger, C., Haushofer, J., & Fehr, E. (2011). The role of testosterone in social interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 263–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 85–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.85 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., Bleske-Rechek, A., & Frederick, D. A. (2007). Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51(1), 40–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.007 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hönekopp, J., & Schuster, M. (2010). A meta-analysis on 2D:4D and athletic prowess: Substantial relationships but neither hand out-predicts the other. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(1), 4–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssens, K., Pandelaere, M., van den Bergh, B., Millet, K., Lens, I., & Roe, K. (2011). Can buy me love: Mate attraction goals lead to perceptual readiness for status products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 254–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josephs, R. A., Newman, M. L., Brown, R. P., & Beer, J. M. (2003). Status, testosterone, and human intellectual performance: Stereotype threat as status concern. Psychological Science, 14, 158–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01435 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Josephs, R. A., Sellers, J. G., Newman, M. L., & Mehta, P. H. (2006). The mismatch effect: When testosterone and status are at odds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 999–1013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.999 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lens, I., Driesmans, K., Pandelaere, M., & Janssens, K. (2012). Would male conspicuous consumption capture the female eye? Menstrual cycle effects on women’s attention to status products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 346–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madrigal, R., & Dalakas, V. (2008). Consumer psychology of sport: More than just a game. In Haugtvedt, C. P., Herr, P. M., & Kardes, F. R. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology. (pp. 857–876). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mandel, N., Petrova, P. K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Images of success and the preference for luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 57–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, J. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior, and health. New Jersey, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Manning, J. T., Barley, L., Walton, J., Lewis-Jones, D. I., Trivers, R. L., Singh, D., … Szwed, A. (2000). The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences and reproductive success: Evidence for sexually antagonistic genes? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 163–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00029-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction, 13, 3000–3004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.11.3000 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard Smith, J., & Price, G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/246015a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98001228 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazur, A., & Lamb, T. A. (1980). Testosterone, status, and mood in human males. Hormones and Behavior, 14, 236–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0018-506X(80)90032-X CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Miller, G. F., & Todd, P. M. (1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 190–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01169-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G., Tybur, J. M., & Jordan, B. D. (2007). Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: Economic evidence for human estrus? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 375–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millet, K., & Dewitte, S. (2008). A subordinate status position increases the present value of financial resources for low 2D:4D men. American Journal of Human Biology, 20(1), 110–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelissen, R. M. A., & Meijers, M. H. C. (2011). Social benefits of luxury brands as costly signals of wealth and status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 343–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, T., Gouveia, M. J., & Oliveira, R. F. (2009). Testosterone responsiveness to winning and losing experiences in female soccer players. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 1056–1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.02.006 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ronay, R., & von Hippel, W. (2010). Power, testosterone, and risk-taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 473–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roney, J. R. (2003). Effects of visual exposure to the opposite sex: Cognitive aspects of mate attraction in human males. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 393–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 257–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/588569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryckmans, J., Millet, K., & Warlop, L. (2015). The influence of facial characteristics on the relation between male 2D:4D and dominance. PLoS ONE, 10, e0143307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 119–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691612474317 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stenstrom, E., Saad, G., Nepomuceno, M. V., & Mendenhall, Z. (2011). Testosterone and domain-specific risk: Digit ratios (2D:4D and rel2) as predictors of recreational, financial, and social risk-taking behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 412–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockley, P., & Campbell, A. (2013). Female competition and aggression: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368, 20130073. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0073 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Bergh, B., & Dewitte, S. (2006). Digit ratio (2D: 4D) Moderates the impact of sexual cues on men’s decisions in ultimatum games. Biological Sciences, 273, 2091–2095. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.944403 Google ScholarPubMed
van der Meij, L., Almela, M., Buunk, A. P., Dubbs, S., & Salvador, A. (2012). 2D:4D in men is related to aggressive dominance but not to sociable dominance. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 208–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.21422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Meij, L., Almela, M., Hidalgo, V., Villada, C., Ijzerman, H., van Lange, P. A. M., & Salvador, A. (2012). Testosterone and cortisol release among spanish soccer fans watching the 2010 World Cup final. PLoS ONE, 7, e34814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034814 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York, NY: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2011). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Biological Sciences, 278, 2223–2232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2145 Google ScholarPubMed
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53(1), 205–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar