Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:50:42.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spanish Version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Validation and Factorial Invariance Analysis in Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2018

Mehdi Bagherzadeh ,
Nicolas Loewe ,
Roy G. Mouawad ,
Joan Manuel Batista-Foguet ,
Luis Araya-Castillo  and
Claudio Thieme
Mehdi Bagherzadeh
Affiliation:
NEOMA Business School (France)
Nicolas Loewe
Affiliation:
Universitat Ramon Llull (Spain)
Roy G. Mouawad*
Affiliation:
Universitat Ramon Llull (Spain)
Joan Manuel Batista-Foguet
Affiliation:
Universitat Ramon Llull (Spain)
Luis Araya-Castillo
Affiliation:
Universidad Miguel de Cervantes (Chile)
Claudio Thieme
Affiliation:
Universidad Diego Portales (Chile)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Roy G. Mouawad. People Management and Organisation, ESADE Business School. Universitat Ramon Llull. 08034. Barcelona (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study is to: (1) examine the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Satisfaction with Life scale (SWLS) on a representative sample of the Chilean population (N = 1,500); (2) test the factorial invariance of the SWLS across gender and employment status (henceforth status); and (3) provide normative data of the SWLS for Chile. Results suggest that the Spanish version of the SWLS is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring global life satisfaction in Chile and for comparison across gender and status. Confirmatory factor analysis shows support, across all groups, for a modified single-factor structure of the SWLS that allows error terms of items 1 and 2 to correlate (GFI > .98; RMSEA < .08). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ranges between .68 and .84 for different groups, with an average value of .80 for the total sample. The SWLS scores converge with an alternative single-item measure of life satisfaction (r = .63, p < .001) and with measures of conceptually related constructs. The factorial structure of the scale is invariant with respect to gender and status (CFI > .99; RMSEA < .06). Metric invariance holds for gender (ΔCFI = 0; RMSEA = .051) and status (Δχ2 = 23.93, nonsignificant; ∆CFI = 0; RMSEA = .045). Scalar invariance holds for gender and some status combinations; partial scalar invariance holds for the rest. Mean levels of life satisfaction can be compared across gender and status, albeit cautiously for status combinations for which scalar invariance does not hold.

Keywords

Chileconfirmatory factor analysisfactorial invarianceSatisfaction with Life ScaleSpanish
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 21 , 2018 , E2
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

How to cite this article:

Bagherzadeh, M., Loewe, N., Mouawad, R. G., Batista-Foguet, J. M., Araya-Castillo, L., & Thieme, C. (2018). Spanish version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Validation and factorial invariance analysis in Chile. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 21. e2. Doi:10.1017/sjp.2018.2

References

Anaby, D., Jarus, T., Backman, C. L., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). The role of occupational characteristics and occupational imbalance in explaining well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 5(2), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-010-9094-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, F. M., & McKennell, A. C. (1980). Measures of self-reported well-being: Their affective, cognitive, and other components. Social Indicators Research, 8(2), 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286474 Google Scholar
Arrindell, W. A., van Nieuwenhuizen, C., & Luteijn, F. (2001). Chronic psychiatric status and satisfaction with life. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00125-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I. & García-Merita, M. L. (2003). Satisfaction with Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1255–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00332-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. (2000). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en adolescentes [Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents]. Psicothema, 12(2), 314–319.Google Scholar
Batista-Foguet, J. M., Saris, W., Boyatzis, R., Guillén, L., & Serlavós, R. (2009). Effect of response scale on assessment of emotional intelligence competencies. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(5–6), 575–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendayan, R., Blanca, M. J., Fernández-Baena, J. F., Escobar, M., & Trianes, M. V. (2013). New empirical evidence on the validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in early adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (2 nd ed.). Nueva York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowling, N. A, Eschleman, K. J., & Wang, Q. (2010). A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between job satisfaction and subjective well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 915–934. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X478557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. M, Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5 Google Scholar
Clench-Aas, J., Nes, R. B., Dalgard, O. S., & Aarø, L. E. (2011). Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Norway. Quality of Life Research, 20(8), 1307–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9859-x Google Scholar
Coenders, G., Satorra, A., & Saris, W. E. (1997). Alternative approaches to structural modeling of ordinal data: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(4), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519709540077 Google Scholar
Diener, E. (2014). Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida [Satisfaction with Life Scale]. Retrieved from Member Resources of the Psychology Department, University of Illinois at Urbana –Champaign website: http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/∼ediener/Documents/SWLS_Spanish2.pdf Google Scholar
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 Google Scholar
Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of Life Satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 25–41.Google Scholar
Gouveia, V. V., Milfont, T. L., da Fonseca, P. N., & de Miranda Coelho, J. A. P. (2009). Life satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in five Brazilian samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9257-0 Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (1995). Multivariate data analysis: Text and readings. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Google Scholar
Loewe, N., Bagherzadeh, M., Araya-Castillo, L., Thieme, C., & Batista-Foguet, J. M. (2014). Life domain satisfactions as predictors of overall life satisfaction among workers: Evidence from Chile. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0408-6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mardia, K. V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B, 36(2), 115–128.Google Scholar
Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3(1), 248–292.Google Scholar
Núñez, J. L., Martín-Albo, J., & Domínguez, E. (2010). Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en sujetos practicantes de actividad física [Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in physical activity practitioners]. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 19(2), 291–304.Google Scholar
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164 Google Scholar
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152. http://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701756946 Google Scholar
Pavot, W., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1998). The temporal Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(2), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa7002_11 Google Scholar
Pons, D., Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2000). Satisfaction with Life Scale: analysis of factorial invariance for adolescents and elderly persons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.62 Google Scholar
Revilla, M. A., Saris, W. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (2014). Choosing the number of categories in agree–disagree scales. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113509605 Google Scholar
Sachs, J. (2003). Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a sample of Hong Kong University students. Psychologia, 46(4), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2003.225 Google Scholar
Saris, W. E., & Satorra, A. (1987). Characteristics of structural equation models which affect the power of the likelihood ratio test. In Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (Eds.), Sociometric research (pp. 220–236). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In von Eye, A. & Clogg, C. C. (Eds.); Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research, (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Hippler, H. J., & Bishop, G. (1991). The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Vassar, M. (2008). A note on the score reliability for the Satisfaction with Life Scale: An RG study. Social Indicators Research, 86(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9113-7 Google Scholar
Vautier, S., Mullet, E., & Jmel, S. (2004). Assessing the structural robustness of self-rated satisfaction with life: A SEM analysis. Social Indicators Research, 68(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000025595.92546.eb Google Scholar
Vázquez, C., Duque, A., & Hervás, G. (2013). Satisfaction with Life Scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: Validation and normative data. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16(e82), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.82 Google Scholar
Vera-Villarroel, P., Urzúa, A., Pavez, P., Celis-Atenas, K., & Silva, J. (2012). Evaluation of subjective well-being: Analysis of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Chilean population. Universitas Psychologica, 11(3), 719–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.012 Google Scholar