Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T07:04:53.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Romantic Relationship Quality in the Digital Age: A Study with Young Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2017

Virginia Sánchez*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Sevilla (Spain)
Noelia Muñoz-Fernández
Affiliation:
Universidad de Sevilla (Spain)
Rosario Ortega-Ruiz
Affiliation:
Universidad de Córdoba (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Virginia Sánchez Jiménez. Departmento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación. Universidad de Sevilla. C/ Camilo José Cela, s/n. 41018. Seville (Spain). Phone: +34–954557650. Fax: +34–954557650. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that the online and offline behaviors young people display in romantic relationships are closely related. However, the differential effects of the dimensions of couple quality in the online context have not yet been explored in depth. The aim of this study was to explore online couple quality in young-adult relationships, and its association with romantic relationship satisfaction, also looking at effects of gender, age, and length of the relationship. 431 university students currently in a romantic relationship (68.2% females; mean age = 21.57) participated in this study. They completed different self-report measures to tap the online quality of their romantic relationships (online intimacy, control, jealousy, intrusiveness, cyberdating practices, and communication strategies) and level of satisfaction with those relationships. Results showed that participants more often reported online intimacy (Mmen = 2.49; Mwomen = 2.38) than the negative scales of online quality (mean ranged from .43 to 1.50), and all the online quality scales decreased with age (correlations ranged from –.12 to –.30) and relationship length (correlations ranged from –.02 to –.20). Linear regression analyses indicated that online intimacy (b = .32, p = .001) and intrusiveness (b = .11, p = .035) were positively related to relationship satisfaction, while cyberdating practices (b = –.20, p = .001) and communication strategies (b = –.34, p = .001) were negatively correlated with relationship satisfaction. Moreover, gender and relationship length moderated some of these associations. Results indicate that while online quality and relationship satisfaction are related, the impact of different online quality dimensions on relationship satisfaction differs depending on a participant’s sex, age, and relationship length.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmetoglu, G., Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The relationship between dimensions of love, personality, and relationship length. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 11811190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9515-5 Google Scholar
Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K. (2005). Infidelity in committed relationships II: A substantive review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 217233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01556.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. D., & Bobkowski, P. S. (2011). Older and newer media: Patterns of use and effects on adolescents’ health and well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 95113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00717.x Google Scholar
Carpenter, C. J., & Spottswood, E. L. (2013). Exploring romantic relationships on social networking sites using the self-expansion model. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 15311537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.021 Google Scholar
Caughlin, J. P., & Sharabi, L. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63, 873893. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12046 Google Scholar
Clayton, R. B. (2014). The third wheel: The impact of Twitter use on relationship infidelity and divorce. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 425430. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0570 Google Scholar
Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. R. (2013). Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 717720. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0424 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connolly, J., Craig, W., Goldberg, A., & Pepler, D. (2004). Mixedgender groups, dating, and romantic relationships in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14, 185207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & Zuniga, De, , H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cravens, J. D., Leckie, K. R., & Whiting, J. B. (2013). Facebook infidelity: When poking becomes problematic. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35(1), 7490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9231-5 Google Scholar
Dhariwal, A., Connolly, J., Paciello, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Adolescent peer relationships and emerging adult romantic styles: A longitudinal study of youth in an Italian community. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 579600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558409341080 Google Scholar
Durán-Segura, M., & Martínez-Pecino, R. (2015). Ciberacoso mediante teléfono móvil e Internet en las relaciones de noviazgo entre jóvenes [Cyberharassment via cell phone and Internet in youth dating relationships]. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 22, 159167. https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-17 Google Scholar
Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 631635. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0318 Google Scholar
Espinoza, A. V., Correa, F. E., & García, L. F. (2014). Percepción social de la infidelidad y estilos de amor en la pareja [Social perception of infidelity and love styles in relationships]. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 19(1), 135147.Google Scholar
Ferrer, V., Bosch, E., Ramis, M. C., & Navarro, C. (2006). Las creencias y actitudes sobre la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja: Determinantes sociodemográficos, familiares y formativos [Beliefs and attitudes about intimate partner violence against women: Sociodemographic, family, and educational determinants]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 251259.Google Scholar
Fox, J., & Warber, K. M. (2013). Romantic relationship development in the age of Facebook: An exploratory study of emerging adults’ perceptions, motives, and behaviors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0288 Google Scholar
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63(1), 103115. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130905 Google Scholar
Hertlein, K. M., & Stevenson, A. (2010). The seven “As” contributing to Internet-related intimacy problems. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 207230.Google Scholar
Hurley, L., & Reese-Weber, M. (2012). Conflict strategies and intimacy: Variations by romantic relationship development and gender. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 6, 200210. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v6i2.101 Google Scholar
Lavy, S., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2013). Intrusiveness from an attachment theory perspective: A dyadic diary study. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 972977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavy, S., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Gillath, O. (2009). Intrusiveness in romantic relationships: A cross-cultural perspective on imbalances between proximity and autonomy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 9891008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509347934 Google Scholar
Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples, the Internet, and social media: How American couples use digital technology to manage life, logistics, and emotional intimacy within their relationships. New York, NY: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/QYkcJv Google Scholar
Madsen, S. D., & Collins, W. A. (2011). The salience of adolescent romantic experiences for romantic relationship qualities in young adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 789801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00737.x Google Scholar
Morey, J. N., Gentzler, A. L., Creasy, B., Oberhauser, A. M., & Westerman, D. (2013). Young adults’ use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 17711778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.019 Google Scholar
Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2014). “Creeping” or just information seeking? Gender differences in partner monitoring in response to jealousy on Facebook. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 3550. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12014 Google Scholar
Rahaman, H. M. S. (2015). Romantic relationship length and its perceived quality: Mediating role of Facebook-related conflict. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11, 395405. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i3.932 Google Scholar
Rauer, A. J., Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2013). Romantic relationship patterns in young adulthood and their developmental antecedents. Developmental Psychology, 49, 21592171. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031845 Google Scholar
Rohman, E., Führer, A., & Bierhoff, H.-W. (2016). Relationship satisfaction across European cultures: The role of love styles. Cross-Cultural Research, 50, 178211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397116630950 Google Scholar
Sánchez, V., Muñoz, N., Nocentini, A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Menesini, E. (2014). Online intrusiveness, online jealousy and dating aggression in young adults: A cross-national study (Spain-Italy). Maltrattamento e Abuso all’Infanzia, 3, 4765. https://doi.org/10.3280/MAL2014-003004 Google Scholar
Sánchez, V., Muñoz-Fernández, N., & Ortega-Ruíz, R. (2015). “Cyberdating Q_A”: An instrument to assess the quality of adolescent dating relationships in social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 7886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, S., & Connolly, J. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1(1), 2739. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696812467330 Google Scholar
Spitzberg, B. H., & Hoobler, G. (2002). Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism. New Media & Society, 4(1), 7192. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226271 Google Scholar
Stewart, M. C., Dainton, M., & Goodboy, A. K. (2014). Maintaining relationships on Facebook: Associations with uncertainty, jealousy, and satisfaction. Communication Reports, 27(1), 1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2013.845675 Google Scholar
Strawhun, J., Adams, N., & Huss, M. T. (2013). The assessment of cyberstalking: An expanded examination including social networking, attachment, jealousy, and anger in relation to violence and abuse. Violence and Victims, 28, 715730. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.11-00145 Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, K., & Šmahel, D. (2011). Digital youth. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 705713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.014 Google Scholar
Utz, S., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2011). The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: Effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 511527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01552.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar