Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:32:00.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reliability and Validity of the Oxford Happiness Inventory among University Students in Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Mohammad Javad Liaghatdar ,
Ebrahim Jafari ,
Mohammad Reza Abedi  and
Fatemeh Samiee
Mohammad Javad Liaghatdar*
Affiliation:
University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran
Ebrahim Jafari
Affiliation:
University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran
Mohammad Reza Abedi
Affiliation:
University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran
Fatemeh Samiee
Affiliation:
University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Mohammad Javad Liaghatdar, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the internal reliability, content validity, construct validity, and concurrent validity of the Persian translation/Farsi version of the Oxford Happiness Inventory. The Oxford Happiness Inventory and Fordyce Happiness Inventory were completed by a sample of 727 Iranian university students. Findings confirmed the internal reliability, construct, and concurrent validity of the Oxford Happiness Inventory. Thus, it can be recommended for use as a trait-measure of happiness among Iranian samples.

El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar la fiabilidad internal, la validez de contenido, la validez de constructo y la validez concurrente de la traducción persa/varsión farsi del Inventario de Felicidad de Oxford (Oxford Happiness Inventory). Una muestra de 727 estudiantes universitarios iraníes completaron el Inventario de Felicidad de Oxford y al Inventario de Felicidad de Fordyce. Los resultados confirmaron la fiabilidad interna, la validez de constructo y la validez concurrente del Inventario de Felicidad de Oxford. Así, puede ser recomendarse para su uso como medida de rasgo de felicidad en muestras iraníes.

Keywords

Oxford Happiness Inventoryreliabilityvaliditydeveloping societiesIranian universitiesInventario de Felicidad de Oxfordfiabilidadvalidezsociedades en desarrollouniversidades iraníes
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , May 2008 , pp. 310 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abedi, M.R. (2002). Effectiveness of Fordyce cognitive-behavioral training on happiness, anxiety, depression, and social relationship among Isfahan university students. Proceedings of the fourth research week of the University of Isfahan (pp. 15–17). Isfahan: The University of Isfahan.Google Scholar
Alipour, A., & Nor-bala, A. (1999). Introductory survey on validity and reliability of Oxford Happiness Inventory in Tehran universities. Journal of Thought and Behavior, 5, 55–63.Google Scholar
Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Argyle, M., & Crossland, J. (1987). Dimensions of positive emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Argyle, M., & Lu, L. (1990). The happiness of extraverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1011–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyle, M., Martin, M., & Crossland, J. (1989). Happiness as a function of personality and social encounters. In Forgas, J.P. & Innes, J.M. (Eds.), Recent advances in social psychology: An international perspective (pp. 189–203). Amsterdam: North Holland, Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Beck, A. (1978). Beck Depression Inventory. Philadelphia: Center for Cognitive Therapy.Google Scholar
Bradburn, N.M. (1963). In pursuit of happiness. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Cruise, S.M., Lewis, C.A., & McGuckin, C. (2006). Internal reliability and temporal stability of the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire short-form: Test-retest data over two weeks. Social Behavior and Personality, 34, 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, M.W. (1990). Happiness: Fact and myths. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fordyce, M.W. (1983). A program to increase happiness: Further studies. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 30, 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, L.J., Brown, L.B., Lester, D., & Philipchalk, R. (1998). Happiness as stable extraversion: a cross-cultural of the reliability and validity of the Oxford Happiness Inventory among students in the UK, USA, Australia and Canada. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Berwin, C.R. (1990). Personality and happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1093–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1071–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jafari, E., Abedi, M.R., & Liaghatdar, M.J. (2004). Investigating the degree of happiness and its related factors in students of the universities in Isfahan. Isfahan, Iran: The University of Isfahan.Google Scholar
Lewis, C.A., Francis, L.J., & Ziebertz, H.G. (2002). The internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity of the German translation of the Oxford Happiness Inventory. North American Journal of Psychology, 4, 211–220.Google Scholar
Lu, L., & Argyle, M. (1991). Happiness and cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1019–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, L., & Argyle, M. (1992). Receiving and giving support: Effects on relationships and well-being. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 5, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, L., & Argyle, M. (1993). TV watching, soap opera and happiness. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 9, 501–507.Google ScholarPubMed