Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:36:32.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Psychophysiological Study of Auditory Illusions of Approach and Withdrawal in the Context of the Perceptual Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Inna A. Vartanyan  and
Irina G. Andreeva
Inna A. Vartanyan*
Affiliation:
I.M. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia
Irina G. Andreeva
Affiliation:
I.M. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Inna A. Vartanyan, I.M. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Torez av., 44, 194223 Saint Petersburg, Russia. FAX: +7(812)5523012. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Auditory perception of the depth of space is based mainly on spectral and amplitude changes of sound waves originating from the sound source and reaching the listener. The perceptive illusion of movement of an auditory image caused by changes in amplitude and/or frequency of the signal tone emanating from an immobile loudspeaker was studied. Analysis of data obtained from the participants revealed the diapason of combinations of amplitude and frequency changes for which the movement direction was perceived similarly by all participants, despite significantly different movement assessment criteria. Additional auditory and visual information of the conditions of radial movement (near or far fields) determined listeners' interpretation of changes in the signal parameters. The data obtained about the perception of approach and withdrawal models are evidence of the fact that the principal cues of the perception of the distance of immobile sound sources manifests similarly to that of an auditory image moving along a radial axis.

La percepción auditiva de la profundidad del espacio se basa principalmente en los cambios de espectro y amplitud de las ondas de sonido que originan desde la fuente del sonido y alcanzan al escuchador. Se estudió la ilusión perceptiva del movimiento de una imagen auditiva causada por los cambios en la amplitud y/o la frecuencia del tono de señal que emana desde un altavoz inmóvil. Análisis de los datos obtenidos de los participantes reveló el diapasón de combinaciones de las modulaciones de amplitud y frecuencia para las cuales el vector de movimiento se percibió de la misma forma por todos los participantes, a pesar de criterios de evaluación del movimiento significativamente diferentes. Información adicional auditiva y visual de las condiciones de movimiento radial (campos cercanos o lejanos) determinó la interpretación de los cambios en los parámetros de la señal por parte de los escuchadores. Los datos obtenidos acerca de la percepción de los modelos de acercamiento y retirada son evidencia del hecho de que los rasgos principales de la percepción de la distancia de fuentes de sonido inmóviles se manifiesta de forma similar a la de una imagen auditiva que se mueve a lo largo de un eje radia.

Keywords

auditory perceptionillusion of movementvirtual realitypercepción auditivailusión de movimientorealidad virtual
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , November 2007 , pp. 266 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, J.A., & Andreeva, I.G. (2004). Monaural perception and binaural perception of approaching and withdrawing auditory images in humans. International Journal of Audiology, 43, 227–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashmead, D.N., Davis, D., & Northington, A. (1995). The contribution of listeners' approaching motion to auditory distance perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 239–256.Google ScholarPubMed
Begault, D.R. (1991). Preferred sound intensity increase for sensation of half distance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 1019–1029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bekesy, G. (1960). Experiments in hearing (p. 745). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Blauert, J. (1983). Spatial hearing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brungart, D.S., & Rabinowitz, W.M. (1999). Auditory localization of nearby sources. Head-related transfer functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1465–1479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burtt, H.E. (1917). Auditory illusions of movement: A preliminary study, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, R.A., Levy, E.T., & Neff, W.D. (1980). Apparent distance of sounds recorded in echoic and anechoic chambers, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 745–750.Google ScholarPubMed
Coleman, P.D. (1962). Failure to localize the source distance of unfamiliar sound. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 345–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, P.D. (1963). An analysis of cues to auditory depth perception in free space. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 302–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, P.D. (1968). Dual role of frequency spectrum in determination of auditory distance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 631–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, M.B. (1969). Distance estimation of 0° or apparent 0°-oriented speech signals in anechoic space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haustein, B.G. (1969). Hypothesen uber die einhorige Entferungswahrnehmung des menschlichen Gehors. Hochfrequensthechnick und Electroakustic, 78, 45–57.Google Scholar
Hornbostel, E.M.v. (1923). Beobachtungen _ber ein- und zweiohrigs Horen. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 64–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, E.T., & Butler, R.A. (1978). Stimulus factors which influence the perceived externalization of sound presented through headphones. The Journal of Auditory Research, 18, 41–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Philbeck, J.W., & Golledge, R.G. (1998). Assessing auditory distance perception using perceptually directed action. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 966–980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mershon, D.H., & King, L.E. (1975). Intensity and reverberation as factors in the auditory perception of egocentric distance. Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middlebrooks, J.C., & Green, D.M. (1991). Sound localization by human listeners. Annual Revue of Psychology, 42, 135–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, J. (1990). Estimation of loudness and apparent distance of pure tones in a free field. Acustica, 70, 61–65.Google Scholar
Piercy, J.E., Embleton, T.F.W., & Sutherland, L.C. (1977). Review of noise propagation in the atmosphere. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1403–1418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, S.S., & Guirao, M. (1962). Loudness, reciprocality and partition scales. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 1466–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strybel, T.Z., Manligas, C.L., & Perrott, D.R. (1992). Minimum audible movement angle as a function of the azimuth and elevation of the source. Human Factors, 34, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strybel, T.Z., & Neale, W. (1994). The effect of burst duration, interstimulus onset interval, and loudspeaker arrangement on auditory apparent motion in free field. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 6, 3463–3475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vartanian, I.A., Andreeva, I.G., Mazing, A.Yu., & Markovich, A.M. (1999). Optimalnie parametri modeli amplitudno-impulsno-modulirovannogo akusticheskogo signala, imitiruyucshego frontalnoye priblijenie i udaleniye istochnika zvuka (Modeling the frontal closing and departure of the sound source). Aviakosmicheskaya i Ekologicheskaya Meditsina, 33, 36–40.Google Scholar
Vartanian, I.A., & Chernigovskaia, T.V. (1980). Vliyanie parametrov akusticheskoi stimulyatsii na otsenku chelovekom izmeneniye rasstoyaniya ot istochnika zvuka (Effect of acoustic stimulation parameters on human appreciation of changes in distance from a sound source). Fisiologicheskii Zhurnal SSSR imeni I.M. Sechenova, 66, 101–108.Google Scholar
Warren, R.M. (1977). Subjective loudness and its physical correlate Acustica, 37, 334–346.Google Scholar