Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T00:29:40.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Affected Decision-Making Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2021

Carlos Romero-Rivas Open the ORCID record for Carlos Romero-Rivas [Opens in a new window]  and
Sara Rodriguez-Cuadrado Open the ORCID record for Sara Rodriguez-Cuadrado [Opens in a new window]
Carlos Romero-Rivas*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
Sara Rodriguez-Cuadrado
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Carlos Romero-Rivas. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. 28049Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A sample of 641 participants were presented with four decision-making tasks during the first stages of the COVID–19 lockdown in Spain: The dictator game, framing problems, utilitarian/deontological and altruistic/egoistic moral dilemmas. Participants also completed questionnaires on mental health status and experiences related to the COVID–19 pandemic. We used boosted regression trees (an advanced form of regression analysis based on machine learning) to model relationships between responses to the questionnaires and decision-making tasks. Results showed that the psychological impact of the COVID–19 pandemic predicted participants’ responses to the framing problems and utilitarian/deontological and altruistic/egoistic moral dilemmas (but not to the dictator game). More concretely, the more psychological impact participants suffered, the more they were willing to choose the safest response in the framing problems, and the more deontological/altruistic were their responses to moral dilemmas. These results suggest that the psychological impact of the COVID–19 pandemic might prompt automatic processes.

Keywords

COVID–19decision-makingdictator gameframing problemsmoral dilemmas
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 24 , 2021 , e16
Copyright
© Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank Professor Jane Elith and Dr. Manuel Herrera-Usagre for their guidance in data analysis. A preprint of this research was published in PsyArXiv (Romero-Rivas, C., & Rodríguez-Cuadrado, S. (2020, April 28). Moral decision-making and mental health during the COVID–19 pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8whkg

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Funding Statement: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Bados, A., Solanas, A., & Andrés, R. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS). Psicothema, 17(4), 679–683.Google Scholar
Báguena Puigcerver, M. J., Soler, E. V., Mateo, M. A. B., Badia, M. C. R., & Reig, R. (2001). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la Escala Revisada de Impacto del Estresor (EIE-R) (Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Revised Stressor Impact Scale (EIE-R)). Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 27(114), 581–604.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Slingsby, J. K., Harrell, K. L., Peekna, H. M., & Todd, R. M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 413–426. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.413CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. http://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395, 912–920. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. A., Sautter, J. A., Littvay, L., Sautter, A. C., & Bearnes, B. (2010). Ethics and personality: Empathy and narcissism as moderators of ethical decision making in business students. Journal of Education for Business, 85(4), 203–208. http://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903449501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capraro, V. (2019). The dual-process approach to human sociality: A review. SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3409146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cella, M., Dymond, S., & Cooper, A. (2010). Impaired flexible decision-making in major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 124(1–2), 207–210. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cellini, N., Canale, N., Mioni, G., & Costa, S. (2020). Changes in sleep pattern, sense of time, and digital media use during COVID–19 lockdown in Italy. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/284mrCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Foucart, A., Arnon, I., Aparici, M., & Apesteguia, J. (2014). “Piensa” twice: On the foreign language effect in decision making. Cognition, 130(2), 236–254. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., Foucart, A., Hayakawa, S., Aparici, M., Apesteguia, J., Heafner, J., & Keysar, B. (2014). Your morals depend on language. PLOS ONE, 9(4), Article e94842. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094842Google ScholarPubMed
Creamer, M., Bell, R., & Failla, S. (2003). Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale-revised. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(12), 1489–1496. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. Times Brooks.Google Scholar
Elith, J., & Leathwick, J. (n.d.). Appendix: Boosted Regression Trees for ecological modeling. R Documentation. https://rspatial.org/raster/sdm/9_sdm_brt.htmlGoogle Scholar
Elith, J., Leathwick, J. R., & Hastie, T. (2008). A working guide to boosted regression trees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77(4), 802–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. St. B. T. , & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science , 8, 223–241. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foot, P. (1978). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect in virtues and vices. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6(3), 347–369. http://doi.org/10.1006/game.1994.1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromell, H., Nosenzo, D., & Owens, T. (2020). Altruism, fast and slow? Evidence from a meta-analysis and a new experiment. Experimental Economics, 23, 979–1001. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09645-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. D. (2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 322–323. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasegawa, T., Ikeda, K., & Takahashi, T. (2007). Social evaluation-induced amylase elevation and economic decision-making in the dictator game in humans. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 28(5), 662–665.Google Scholar
Kahane, G., Everett, J. A. C., Earp, B. D., Farias, M., & Savulescu, J. (2015). ‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition, 134, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica , 47, 263–292. http://doi.org/10.2307/1914185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Gómez, I., Hervás, G., & Vázquez, C. (2015). Adaptación de la “Escala de afecto positivo y negativo” (PANAS) en una muestra general española (Adaptation of the ”Positive and Negative Affect Scale” (PANAS) in a general Spanish sample). Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 23, 529–548.Google Scholar
Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Psychology Foundation of Australia.Google Scholar
May, C. L., & Wisco, B. E. (2020). Reward processing and decision-making in Posttraumatic stress disorder. Behavior Therapy, 51(5), 814–828. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2019.11.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, P. A., & Roberts, J. (2017). Situational determinants of cognitive, affective, and compassionate empathy in naturalistic digital interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 137–148. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odriozola-González, P., Planchuelo-Gómez, Á., Irurtia-Muñiz, M. J., & de Luis-García, R. (2020). Psychological symptoms of the outbreak of the COVID–19 crisis and confinement in the population of Spain. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mq4fgCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porcelli, A. J., & Delgado, M. R. (2009). Acute stress modulates risk taking in financial decision making. Psychological Science, 20(3), 278–283. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02288.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rand, D. G., Brescoll, V. L., Everett, J. A. C., Capraro, V., & Barcelo, H. (2016). Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 145, 389–396. http://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruderman, L., Ehrlich, D. B., Roy, A., Pietrzak, R. H., Harpaz-Rotem, I., & Levy, I. (2016). Posttraumatic stress symptoms and aversion to ambiguous losses in combat veterans. Depression and Anxiety, 33(7), 606–613. http://doi.org/10.1002/da.22494CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sailer, U., Robinson, S., Fischmeister, F. P. S., König, D., Oppenauer, C., Lueger-Schuster, B., Moser, E., Kryspin-Exner, I., & Bauer, H. (2008). Altered reward processing in the nucleus accumbens and mesial prefrontal cortex of patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychologia, 46(11), 2836–2844. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stagnaro, M., Littman, R., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Individual difference in acts of self-sacrifice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, Article E217. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18001759CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starcke, K., & Brand, M. (2012). Decision making under stress: A selective review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1228–1248. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starcke, K., Polzer, C., Wolf, O. T., & Brand, M. (2011). Does stress alter everyday moral decision-making? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36(2), 210–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94(6), 1395–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17(6), 476–477. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01731.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Gelder, J.-L., de Vries, R. E., & van Der Pligt, J. (2009). Evaluating a dual-process model of risk: Affect and cognition as determinants of risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(1), 45–61. http://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Horby, P. W., Hayden, F. G., & Gao, G. F. (2020). A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. The Lancet, 395(10223), 470–473. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020). Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID–19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), Article 1729. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729Google ScholarPubMed
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. (2018). Dying for the group: Towards a general theory of extreme self-sacrifice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, Article E192. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18000249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youssef, F. F., Dookeeram, K., Basdeo, V., Francis, E., Doman, M., Mamed, D., Maloo, S., Degannes, J., Dobo, L., Disthotlo, P., & Legall, G. (2012). Stress alters personal moral decision making. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(4), 491–498. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, R. (2016). Stress potentiates decision biases: A stress induced deliberation-to-intuition (SIDI) model. Neurobiology of Stress, 3, 83–95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2015.12.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed