Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:38:16.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary Validation in Spanish of a Scale Designed to Measure Motivation in Physical Education Classes: The Perceived Locus of Causality (PLOC) Scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Juan Antonio Moreno Murcia ,
David González-Cutre Coll  and
Mariana Chillón Garzón
Juan Antonio Moreno Murcia*
Affiliation:
Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche(Spain)
David González-Cutre Coll
Affiliation:
Universidad de Almería (Spain)
Mariana Chillón Garzón
Affiliation:
Unidad de Investigación en Educación Física y Deportes (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Juan Antonio Moreno Murcia, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Edificio Torrevaillo, Avda. de la Universidad s/n, 03202 Elche, ALICANTE (Spain). Phone: +34-965-222046. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to validate the Spanish version of the Perceived Locus of Causality Scale (PLOC; Goudas, Biddle, & Fox, 1994). To achieve this, two studies with samples of 1535 and 400 physical education students, of ages 12 to 17 years, were carried out. The psychometric properties of the PLOC were examined through the following analyses: confirmatory factor analysis, factor invariance, correlation among factors, reliability (Cronbach's alpha), temporal stability (test-retest), and criterion validity. The results partially supported the five-factor structure. This structure was invariant across the two study samples. Correlations among the subscales indicated a simplex pattern, supporting construct validity of the scale. Alpha values over .70 (except for introjected regulation) and high temporal stability (intra-class correlation coefficient = .83 to .90) over a four-week period were obtained. The mastery-approach goal positively predicted self-determined motivation, whereas the performance-avoidance goal predicted it negatively. Future studies should continue to analyze the psychometric properties of the PLOC, as the validation of an instrument should be an ongoing process.

El objetivo de este trabajo fue validar la versión española de la Escala del Locus Percibido de Causalidad (PLOC) de Goudas, Biddle y Fox (1994). Para ello, se llevaron a cabo dos estudios con muestras de 1535 y 400 alumnos en clases de educación física, edades entre 12 y 17 años. Se analizaron las propiedades psicométricas de la PLOC por medio de análisis factoriales confirmatorios, análisis de la invarianza factorial, análisis de correlaciones entre factores, fiabilidad a través del alfa de Cronbach, estabilidad temporal test-retest y validez de criterio. Los resultados ofrecieron un apoyo parcial a la estructura de cinco factores. Esta estructura se mostró invariante entre las dos muestras de estudio. Las correlaciones entre las subescalas indicaron un modelo simplex que apoya la validez de constructo de la escala. Se obtuvieron valores alfa de Cronbach superiores a .70, salvo para la regulación introyectada, y altos niveles de estabilidad temporal (coeficiente de correlación intra-clase = .83 a .90) en un periodo de cuatros semanas. La meta de aproximación-maestría predijo positivamente la motivación autodeterminada, mientras que la meta de evitación-rendimiento lo hizo de forma negativa. Futuros trabajos deberán continuar analizando las propiedades psicométricas de la PLOC, puesto que la validación de un instrumento debe ser un proceso continuado.

Keywords

motivationself-determinationphysical educationvalidationachievement goalsmotivaciónautodeterminacióneducación físicavalidaciónmetas de logro
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , May 2009 , pp. 327 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and means structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.Google Scholar
Cea, M. A. (2002). Análisis multivariable. Teoría y práctica en la investigación social. Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
Chantal, Y., Robin, P., Vernat, J. P., & Bernache-Asollant, I. (2005). Motivation, sportspersonship and athletic aggression: A mediational analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In Dienstbier, R. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, A. J., & Conroy, D. E. (2005). Beyond the dichotomous model of achievement goals in sport and exercise psychology. Sport and Exercise Psychology Review, 1, 17–25.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudas, M., Biddle, S. J. H., & Fox, K. (1994). Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations and perceived competence in school physical education classes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 453–463.Google Scholar
Guan, J., Xiang, P., McBride, R., & Bruene, A. (2006). Achievement goals, social goals and students' reported persistence and effort in high school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Adaptación de tests para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas: fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas. In Muñiz, J. (Ed.), Psicometría (pp. 207–238). Madrid: Universitas.Google Scholar
Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
Kowal, J., & Fortier, M. S. (2000). Testing relationships from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation using flow as a motivational consequence. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 171–181.Google Scholar
Lynn, M. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, H. W. (1993). The multidimensional structure of physical fitness: Invariance over gender and age. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64, 256–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling 11, 320–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller, A. C., & Elliot, A. J. (2006). The 2 × 2 achievement goal framework: An overview of empirical research. In Mittel, A. (Ed.), Focus on educational psychology (pp. 307–326). New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. A., Cervelló, E., & Martínez Camacho, A. (2007). Measuring self-determination motivation in a physical fitness setting: Validation of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2) in a Spanish sample. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 47, 366–378.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. A., González-Cutre, D., & Sicilia, A. (2008). Metas de logro 2 × 2 en estudiantes españoles de educación física. Revista de Educación.Google Scholar
Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 225–242.Google Scholar
Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 444–453.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Núñez, J. L., Martín-Albo, J., Navarro, J. G., & González, V. M. (2006). Preliminary validation of a Spanish version of the Sport Motivation Scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 102, 919–930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Brière, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 35–53.Google Scholar
Prusak, K. A., Treasure, D. C., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2004). The effects of choice on the motivation of adolescent girls in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Conell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for action in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 411–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2006). Students' motivational processes and their relationship to teacher ratings in school physical education: A self-determination theory approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77, 100–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 271–360). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vallerand, R. J. (2001). A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise. In Roberts, G. C. (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 263–319). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Vallerand, R. J. (2007). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and physical activity. A review an a look at the future. In Tenenbaum, G., & Eklund, R. C. (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 59–83). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017.Google Scholar
Vallerand, R. J., & Rousseau, F. L. (2001). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise: A review using the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In Singer, R. N., Hausenblas, H. A., & Janelle, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (2nd ed., pp. 389–416). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wang, C. K. J., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2001). Young people's motivational profiles in physical activity: A cluster analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 23, 1–22.Google Scholar
Wang, C. K. J., Biddle, S. J. H., & Elliot, A. J. (2007). The 2 × 2 achievement goal framework in a physical education context. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 147–168.Google Scholar