Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T08:25:31.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predictors of Beliefs in Intergroup Forgiveness in a Chilean General Population Sample

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2015

Manuel Cárdenas ,
Maitane Arnoso  and
Darío Páez
Manuel Cárdenas*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valparaíso (Chile)
Maitane Arnoso
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco (Spain)
Darío Páez
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Manuel Cárdenas. Universidad de Valparaíso. (Chile). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Original survey data from a Chilean sample (N = 1267) are used to study the socio-demographic and psychosocial determinants of belief in forgiveness attitudes in the context of measuring the impact of truth and reconciliation reports (NTRC, 1991) and Political Imprisonment and Torture (NPIC, 2004) commissions. A linear multiple regression analysis (R 2 = .15; F(8, 1269) = 14.65; p < .001; effect size f 2 = .18) revealed the positive effect of perceived apology sincerity (β = 0.22; p < .001), emotions of anger (β = –0.08; p < .05), and positive social climate (β = 0.08; p < .05). People who believe in the victims’ forgiveness feel less anger, have more positive perceptions of the sincerity and efficacy of the apologies, agree to a greater extent that the commission helped to find out the truth about what happened to the victims, and have a greater perception of the social climate as positive. The results show the importance of psychosocial and institutional variables in beliefs about forgiveness, and they suggest differences between interpersonal and intergroup forgiveness processes.

Keywords

Chilepolitical violencereparation measuresofficial apologiesand forgiveness
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 18 , 2015 , E37
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguilar, P., Balcells, L., & Cebolla, H. (2011). Las actitudes de los españoles ante las medidas de justicia transicional relativas a la guerra civil y al franquismo [Spaniard’s attitudes towards civil war and francoism’s transitional justice measures]. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 69, 59–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ris.2009.06.30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avruch, K. (2010). Truth and reconciliation commissions: Problems in transitional justice and the reconstruction of identity. Transcultural Psychiatry, 47, 33–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1363461510362043 Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, D. (Ed.) (2011). Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: Social psychological perspective. Hove, UK and New York, NY: Psychology Press: Frontiers of Social Psychology Series.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Exline, J. J., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In Worthington, E. L. Jr. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological principles (pp. 79–106). Philadelphia, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Bellelli, G., Leone, G., & Cursi, A. (1999). Emoción y memoria colectiva. El recuerdo de los acontecimientos públicos [Emotion and collective memory. The memory of public events]. Psicología política, 18, 101–124.Google Scholar
Beristain, C. M., Páez, D., Rimé, B., & Kanyangara, P. (2010). Psychosocial effects of participation in rituals of transitional justice. Revista de Psicología Social, 25, 47–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021347410790193450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brahms, E. (2009). What is a truth commission and why does it matter? Peace and Conflict Review, 3, 1–14.Google Scholar
Brounéus, K. (2008). Truth-telling as talking cure? Insecurity and Retraumatization in the Rwandan Gacaca Courts. Security Dialogue, 39, 55–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010607086823 Google Scholar
Brown, R., González, R., Zagefka, H. Manzi, J., & Cehajic, S. (2008). Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75 Google Scholar
Brown, R., & Cehajic, S. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669–684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.466 Google Scholar
Cárdenas, M., Páez, D., & Rimé, B. (2013a). El impacto psicosocial de los procesos transicionales en Chile: Evaluación de los efectos de las Comisiones Nacional de “Verdad y Reconciliación” y “prisión política y tortura” [The psychosocial impact of transitional processes in Chile: Assessing the impact of the National Commissions on “Truth and Reconciliation” and “Political Imprisonment and Torture”]. Revista de Psicología Social, 28, 145–156.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, M., Páez, D., & Rimé, B. (2013b). Transitional justice processes, shared narrative memory about past collective violence and reconciliation. In Cabecinhas, R. & Abadia, L. (Eds.). Narratives and social memory: Theoretical and methodological approaches (pp. 61–75). Braga, Portugal: University of Minho.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, M., Páez, D., Rimé, B., Bilbao, A., & Asún, D. (2014). Personal emotions, emotional climate, social sharing, beliefs, and values among people affected and unaffected by past political violence. Peace & Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20, 452–464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pac0000038 Google Scholar
Cárdenas, M., Páez, D., Arnoso, M., & Rimé, B. (2013). Percepción del clima socioemocional y la confianza institucional en víctimas de violencia política: Valoración del impacto de la comisión nacional de verdad y reconciliación [The perception of the socio-emotional climate and institutional trust in victims of political violence: Impact assessment of the national commission of truth and reconciliation]. Psykhe, 22, 111–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.22.2.572 Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación (1991). Informe de la Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación [Report of the National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation]. Santiago, Chile: Andros Impresores.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de Prisión Política y Tortura (2014). Informe de la Comisión Nacional de Prisión Política y Tortura [Report of the National Commission on Political Imprisonment and Torture]. Santiago, Chile: Author. Retrieved from http://www.comisionvalech.gov.cl/InformeValech.html Google Scholar
De Rivera, J., & Páez, D. (2007). Emotional climates, human security, and cultures of peace. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 233–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00506.x Google Scholar
Devos, T., Silver, L. A., Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2002). Experiencing intergroup emotions. In Mackie, D. M. & Smith, E. R. (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 113–134). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Dresler-Hawke, E., & Liu, J. H. (1996). Collective shame and the positioning of German national identity. Psicología Política, 32, 131–153.Google Scholar
Etxeberría, I., Conejero, S., & Pascual, A. (2011). La culpa en contextos de violencia política [Guilt in contexts of political violence]. In Páez, D., Beristain, M., González, J. L., Basabe, N., & de Rivera, J. (Eds.), Superando la violencia colectiva y construyendo cultura de paz [Overcoming collective violence and building a culture of peace] (pp. 39–68). Madrid, Spain: Fundamentos.Google Scholar
Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894–914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019993 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredrickson, B. (2009). Positivity. New York, NY: Crown.Google Scholar
Hayner, P. B. (2001). Unspeakable truths: Confronting state terror and atrocity. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (2003). Censo 2002. Síntesis de Resultados. [Census 2002. Summary of Results] Santiago, Chile: La Nación SA. Retrieved from http://www.ine.cl/cd2002/sintesiscensal.pdf Google Scholar
Jelin, E., & Langland, I. (2003). Monumentos, memoriales y marcas territoriales [Monuments, memorials and territorial markings] . Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Kaminer, D., Stein, D. J., Mbanga, I., & Zungu-Dirwayi, N. (2001). The truth and reconciliation commission in South Africa: Relation to psychiatric status and forgiveness among survivors of human rights violations. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 373–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.178.4.373 Google Scholar
Kanyangara, P. (2008). Justice et verite après un genocide: Impact psychosocial sur le pardon et la reconciliation [Justice and truth after genocide: Psychosocial impact on forgiveness and reconciliation] . (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Faculte de Psychologie. Louvain, Belgique.Google Scholar
Kanyangara, P., Rimé, B., Philippot, P., & Yzerbit, V. (2007). Collective rituals, emotional climate and intergroup perception: Participation in Gacaca tribunals and the assimilation of the Rwandan genocide. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 387–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00515.x Google Scholar
Lira, E. (2010). La reparación a las víctimas: Una responsabilidad del Estado [The reparation to victims: A state responsibility]. Mensaje, 59, 6–11.Google Scholar
Lira, E. (2011). Verdad, reparación y justicia: El pasado que sigue vivo en el presente [Truth, justice and reparation: The past is still alive in the present]. In Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos. Contribución de las políticas de verdad, justicia y reparación a las democracias en América Latina [Contribution of policies of truth, justice and reparation for democracies in Latin America] (pp.85–127). San José, Costa Rica: IIDH.Google Scholar
Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (Eds.) (2002). From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Manzi, J. (2006). Memoria colectiva del golpe de estado en Chile [Collective memory of the coup d’etat in Chile]. In Carretero, M., Rosa, A., & González, M. F. (Eds.), Enseñanza de la historia y memoria colectiva [Teaching history and collective memory] . Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.Google Scholar
Manzi, J., Ruiz, S., Krause, M., Meneses, A., Haye, A., & Kronmüller, E. (2004). Memoria colectiva del golpe de Estado de 1973 en Chile [Collective memory of the 1973 military coup in Chile]. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 38, 153–169.Google Scholar
Manzi, J., & González, R. (2007). Forgiveness and reparation in Chile: The role of cognitive and emotional intergroup antecedents. Peace & Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13, 71–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0094025 Google Scholar
Morton, T. A., & Postmes, T. (2011). Moral duty or moral defense? The effects of perceiving shared humanity with the victims of in-group perpetrated harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 127–134.Google Scholar
Mullet, E., Nann, S., Kandiangandu, J., Neto, F., & Pinto, M. da C. (2011). Hacia una política positiva: El caso del perdón en el contexto intergrupal de África y Asia [Towards a positive policy: The case of intergroup forgiveness in the context of Africa and Asia]. In Páez, D., Beristain, M., González, J. L., Basabe, N., & de Rivera, J. (Eds.), Superando la violencia colectiva y construyendo cultura de paz [Overcoming collective violence and building a culture of peace] (pp. 377–398). Madrid, Spain: Fundamentos.Google Scholar
Nadler, A., & Schnabel, N. (2008). Instrumental and socioemotional paths to intergroup reconciliation and the need-based model of socio-emotional reconciliation. In Nadler, A., Malloy, T. E., & Fisher, J. D. (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation (pp.37–56). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, A., Malloy, T. E., & Fisher, J. D. (2008). The Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Noor, M., Brown, R., & Prentice, G. (2008). Prospects for intergroup reconciliation: Social-psychological predictors of intergroup forgiveness and reparation in Northern Ireland and Chile. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 97–114). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Páez, D. (2010). Official or political apologies and improvement of intergroup relations: A neo-Durkheimian approach to official apologies as rituals. Revista de Psicología Social: International Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 101–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021347410790193504 Google Scholar
Philpot, C. R., & Hornsey, M. J. (2008). What happens when groups say sorry: The effects of intergroup apologies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 474–487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167207311283 Google Scholar
Rimé, B., Finkenauer, C., Luminet, O., Zech, E., & Philippot, P. (1998). Social sharing of emotion: New evidence and new questions. In Stroebe, W. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), (pp. 845–189). Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Rimé, B., Kanyangara, P., Yzerbyt, V., & Paez, D. (2011). The impact of Gacaca tribunals in Rwanda: Psychosocial effects of participation in a truth and reconciliation process after a genocide. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 695–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.822 Google Scholar
Sikkink, K., & Booth Walling, C. (2007). The Impact of human rights in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, 44, 427–445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343307078953 Google Scholar
Staub, E., Pearlman, L. A., Gubin, A., & Hagengimana, A. (2005). Healing, reconciliation, forgiving and the prevention of violence after genocide or mass killing: An intervention and its experimental evaluation in Rwanda. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 297–334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.24.3.297.65617 Google Scholar
Stroebe, W., & Stroebe, M. (1996). The social psychology of social support. In Higgins, T. & Kruglanski, W.: Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 597–622). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tam, T., Hewston, M., Cairns, E., Tausch, N., Maio, G., & Kenworthy, J. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 119–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430207071345 Google Scholar
Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. B., Cairns, E., Marinetti, C., Geddes, L., & Parkinson, B. (2008). Postconflict reconciliation: Intergroup forgiveness and implicit biases in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 303–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00563.x Google Scholar
van Tongeren, D. R., Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E., Worthington, E. L. Jr., & Forsyth, D. R. (2014). A meta-analysis of intergroup forgiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 81–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.844268 Google Scholar
Vázquez, C., & Páez, D. (2011). Post-traumatic growth in Spain. In Weiss, T. & Berger, R. (Eds.), Post-traumatic growth and culturally competent practice (pp. 97–112). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Wohl, M. J. A., Hornsey, M. J., & Bennett, S. H. (2012). Why group apologies succeed and fail: Intergroup forgiveness and the role of primary and secondary emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 306–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024838 Google Scholar
Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.288 Google Scholar
Zech, E., Rimé, B., & Nils, F. (2004). Social sharing of emotion, emotional recovery, and interpersonal aspects. In Philippot, P. & Feldman, R. (Eds.). The regulation of emotion (pp. 159–188). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar