Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:22:38.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

J. Lillo Jover ,
J.A. Da Silva  and
J.A. Aznar-Casanova
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Monographic Section: Spatial Vision and Visual Space
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , November 2006 , pp. 237 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campell, F.W., & Robson, J.G. (1968). Application of Fourier Analysis to the visibility of gratings. Journal of Physiology, 197, 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, R. H. S. (1988). Movements of the eyes. Pion, London.Google Scholar
De Valois, R.L., & De Valois, K.K. (1988). Spatial vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frenz, H., & Lappe, M. (2005). Absolute travel distances from optic flow. Vision Research, 45, 1679–1692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilchrist, A., Kossyfidis, C., Bonato, F., Agostini, T., Cataliotti, J., Li, X., Spehar, B., Annan, V., & Economou, E. (1999). An anchoring theory of lightness perception. Psychological Review, 106, 795–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillebrand, F. (1902). Theorie der scheinbaren grösse bei binocularem Sehen (Theory of apparent size in binocular vision). Denkschriften der Wiener Akademic. Mathematisch Naturwissenschaft Klasse, 72, 255–307.Google Scholar
Indow, T. (1991). A critical review of Luneburg's model with regard to global structure of visual space. Psychological Review, 98, 430–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Indow, T. (1997). Hyperbolic representation of global structure of visual space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indow, T. (1999). Global structure of visual space as a united entity. Mathematical Social Sciences, 38, 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indow, T. (2004). Global structure of visual space. London: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenderink, J.J., van Doorn, A.J., & Lappin, J.S. (2000). Direct measurement of curvature of visual space. Perception, 29, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, M. (2003). The space between our ears: How the brain represents visual space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Proffitt, D.R., Stefanucci, J., Banton, T., & Epstein, W. (2003). The role of effort in distance perception. Psychological Science, 14, 106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, H.A. (1986). Space perception. In Boff, K.R., Kaufman, L., & Thomas, J.P. (Eds.), Handbook of human perception and performance (Chap. 21). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
von Helmholtz, H. (1962). Physiological optics (J.P.C. Southall, Trans). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1866)Google Scholar
Wagner, M. (2006). The geometries of visual space. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar