Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:16:51.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How does the Leader’s Centrality affect Team Performance Assessment? Testing the Role of Leader’s Satisfaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2020

Marta Pereira Alves Open the ORCID record for Marta Pereira Alves [Opens in a new window] ,
Isabel Dórdio Dimas Open the ORCID record for Isabel Dórdio Dimas [Opens in a new window]  and
Paulo Renato Lourenço Open the ORCID record for Paulo Renato Lourenço [Opens in a new window]
Marta Pereira Alves*
Affiliation:
NECE-UBI, Universidade da Beira Interior, Portugal
Isabel Dórdio Dimas
Affiliation:
CeBER, Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
Paulo Renato Lourenço
Affiliation:
CeBER, Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Marta Pereira Alves. Research Center in Business Sciences (NECE-UBI), University of Beira Interior, Rua Marquês d’Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001, Covilhã (Portugal). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study aims to test how the association between leader’s centrality (outdegree and betweenness) in the group network, considering both workflow and friendship ties between leader and members, and the perception of team performance is mediated by the leader’s satisfaction with the team. The research included a total of 74 formal leaders of organizational teams from several organizations. Total, direct and indirect effects were calculated through the estimation of an OLS regression-based mediation model, controlling for team size. Results revealed that only leader’s outdegree and betweenness centrality in the team friendship network positively predicted the leader’s perception of team performance. In contrast to the predictions, a significant negative indirect effect of outdegree centrality of the leader within the team workflow network on the evaluation of group performance through leader’s satisfaction was observed. Also, both leader´s outdegree and betweenness centrality levels in the friendship network were shown to have a positive effect on leader’s assessment of team performance through leader’s satisfaction with the team. Overall, findings point to the negative effects of leader’s centrality in the workflow team network and the positive effects of leader’s centrality in the friendship team network on his/her attitudes toward the team. The effects of the more or less central position of the leader within each of the group networks are discussed.

Keywords

friendship networkleader’s centralityleader’s satisfactionteam performance assessmentworkflow network
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 23 , 2020 , e38
Copyright
© Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Funding Statement: This work has been supported by National Funds through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (UIDB/04630/2020, UIDB/05037/2020).

References

Alves, M. P., & Lourenço, P. R. (2017). Workgroup interdependence assessment: Group-referent scales and social network analysis. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 24(1), 23–44. http://doi.org/10.4473/TPM24.1.2Google Scholar
Alves, M. P. , Lourenço, P. R., & Miguez, J. (2013). How to measure socioemotional ties in workgroups? Validation of Workgroup Socioaffective Interdependence Scale. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1084–1089. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Sage Publications. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781452204666Google Scholar
Balkundi, P., Barsness, Z., & Michael, J. H. (2009). Unlocking the influence of leadership network structures on team conflict and viability. Small Group Research, 40(3), 301–322. http://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409333404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkundi, P., & Harrison, D. A. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 49–68. http://doi.org/10.2307/20159745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkundi, P., & Kilduff, M. (2006). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 419–439. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkundi, P., Kilduff, M., & Harrison, D. A. (2011). Centrality and charisma: Comparing how leader networks and attributions affect team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1209–1222. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024890CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berson, Y., Dan, O., & Yammarino, F. J. (2006). Attachment style and individual differences in leadership perceptions and emergence. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(2), 165–182. http://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.146.2.165-182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrendt, P., Matz, S., & Göritz, A. S. (2017). An integrative model of leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 229–244. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The modeling and assessment of work performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823–847 http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., Braun, M. T., & Contractor, N. S. (2015). Social network approaches to leadership: An integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 597–622. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0038922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carleton, E. L., Barling, J., & Trivisonno, M. (2018). Leaders’ trait mindfulness and transformational leadership: The mediating roles of leaders’ positive affect and leadership self-efficacy. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 50(3), 185–194. http://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, C.-Y. C., Balkundi, P., & Weinberg, F. J. (2017). When managers become leaders: The role of manager network centralities, social power, and followers’ perception of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), 334–348. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, S.-F., & Chen, H.-L. (2005). Relationship between job characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior: The meditational role of job satisfaction. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 33(6), 523–540. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.6.523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(97)90034-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curral, L. A., Forrester, R. H., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2001). It’s what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 187–204. http://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Flap, H., & Völker, B. (2001). Goal specific social capital and job satisfaction: Effects of different types of networks on instrumental and social aspects of work. Social Networks, 23(4), 297–320. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8733(01)00044-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. http://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. (1987). The design of work teams. In Lorsch, J. W. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Behavior (pp. 315–342). Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 844–863. http://doi.org/10.5465/256761Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. http://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd Ed.). Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1998). Friendship and group identification: A new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(3), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199805/06)28:3<323::AID-EJSP854>3.0.CO;2-Y3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, B., & Reinelt, C. (2010). Social network analysis and the evaluation of leadership networks. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(4), 600–619. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36–51. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social networks analysis (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, D. T., Konczak, L. J., & Bottom, W. P. (2015). Team performance as a joint function of team member satisfaction and agreeableness. Small Group Research, 46(2), 160–178. http://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414567684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwok, N., Hanig, S., Brown, D. J., & Shen, W. (2018). How leader role identity influences the process of leader emergence: A social network analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(6), 648–662. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F., Li, Y., & Wang, E. (2009). Task characteristics and team performance: The mediating effect of team member satisfaction. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37(10), 1373–1382. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.10.1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lourenço, P. R., Dimas, I. D., & Rebelo, T. M. M. S. D. (2014). Effective workgroups: The role of diversity and culture. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 30, 123–132. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2014.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehra, A., Dixon, A. L., Brass, D. J., & Robertson, B. (2006). The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organization Science, 17(1), 64–79. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 121–146. http://doi.org/10.2307/2667127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Effects of communication network structure: Components of positional centrality. Social Networks, 13(2), 169–185. http://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(91)90019-pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nootjarat, R., Chantatub, W., & Chongstitvatana, P. (2015). The moderating effect of leader centrality on team cohesion and performance in software development projects. International Journal of Business and Information, 10(3), 295–322.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C. A., Williams, K. Y., & Barsade, S. (1998). Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help? In Neale, M. A., Mannix, E. A., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 183–207). Jai Press.Google Scholar
Park, S., Grosser, T. J., Roebuck, A. A., & Mathieu, J. E. (2020). Understanding work teams from a network perspective: A review and future research directions. Journal of Management https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320901573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. http://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Marques-Quinteiro, P., Navarro, J., & Rico, R. (2018). Teams as complex adaptive systems: Reviewing 17 years of research. Small Group Research, 49(2), 135–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417713849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, N. C., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). The ties of meeting leaders: A social network analysis. Psychology, 6(4), 415–434. http://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2015.64039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scullen, S. E., Mount, M. K., & Goff, M. (2000). Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 956–970. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.956CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabernero, C., Chambel, M. J., Curral, L., & Arana, J. M. (2009). The role of task-oriented versus relationship-oriented leadership on normative contract and group performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37(10), 1391–1404. http://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.10.1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tse, H. H. M., & Dasborough, M. T. (2008). A study of exchange and emotions in team member relationships. Group & Organization Management, 33(2), 194–215. http://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106293779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhl-Bien, M., & Marion, R. (2011). Complexity leadership theory. In Bryman, A., Collinson, D., Grint, K., Jackson, B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of leadership (pp. 468–482). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
van de Voorde, K., van Veldhoven, M., & Paauwe, J. (2014). Relationships between work unit climate and labor productivity in the financial sector: A longitudinal test of the mediating role of work satisfaction. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.729312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkataramani, V., Zhou, L., Wang, M., Liao, H., & Shi, J. (2016). Social networks and employee voice: The influence of team members’ and team leaders’ social network positions on employee voice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 132, 37–48. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 557–574. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z., Chen, X., & Yu, M. (2017). Interactive effect of leader–member tie and network centrality on leadership effectiveness. Social Behavior and Personality, 45(7), 1197–1210. http://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G. Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. http://doi.org/10.1086/651257CrossRefGoogle Scholar