Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:43:26.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Healthy Context Paradox: When Reducing Bullying comes at a Cost to Certain Victims

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2022

Beatriz Lucas-Molina Open the ORCID record for Beatriz Lucas-Molina [Opens in a new window] ,
Alicia Pérez-Albéniz Open the ORCID record for Alicia Pérez-Albéniz [Opens in a new window]  and
Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero Open the ORCID record for Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero [Opens in a new window]
Beatriz Lucas-Molina*
Affiliation:
Universitat de València (Spain) Programa Riojano de Investigación en Salud Mental (PRISMA) (Spain)
Alicia Pérez-Albéniz
Affiliation:
Programa Riojano de Investigación en Salud Mental (PRISMA) (Spain) Universidad de La Rioja (Spain)
Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero
Affiliation:
Programa Riojano de Investigación en Salud Mental (PRISMA) (Spain) Universidad de La Rioja (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Beatriz Lucas-Molina. Departament of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Universitat de València. Avda. Blasco Ibáñez, 21. 46010 Valencia (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bullying remains one of the most serious problems affecting school systems around the world. The negative consequences of bullying in the short and long term have been widely documented, showing that victimized students are at greater risk of suffering psychosocial distress. In this paper, we first summarize the current situation of bullying prevention, adopting a contextual perspective, and briefly highlighting the characteristics of the most effective prevention programs. Secondly, we address a disturbing phenomenon detected in classrooms where bullying has been reduced through interventions and which has been termed “the healthy context paradox”. In these healthier contexts, students who remain in a situation of victimization have been found to present poorer psychological adjustment after the intervention. Understanding the causes of this phenomenon may offer clues for the prevention of bullying. In this regard, we present three hypotheses recently proposed to explain the phenomenon. Finally, we offer some implications for the study and prevention of bullying derived from “the healthy context paradox”.

Keywords

Bullyingclassroomhealthy context paradoxpreventionvictimization
Type
Review Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 25 , 2022 , e27
Copyright
© Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Funding Statement: This work was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación del Gobierno de España (reference number PID2021-127301OB-I00) and by a Research Award from the Instituto de Estudios Riojanos (BOR Nº147, August 2, 2022).

Conflict of Interests: None.

References

Arseneault, L. (2018). Annual Research Review. The persistent and pervasive impact of being bullied in childhood and adolescence: Implications for policy and practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(4), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12841 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baier, D., Hong, J. S., Kliem, S., & Bergmann, M. C. (2019). Consequences of bullying on adolescents’ mental health in Germany: Comparing face-to-face bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(9), 2347–2357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1181-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannink, R., Broeren, S., van de Looij-Jansen, P. M., de Waart, F. G., & Raat, H. (2014). Cyber and traditional bullying victimization as a risk factor for mental health problems and suicidal ideation in adolescents. PloS ONE, 9(4), Article e94026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094026 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). Translating research to practice in bullying prevention. American Psychologist, 70(4), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039114 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, M. E., & Aalsma, M. C. (2005). Bullying and peer victimization: Position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36(1), 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.09.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of school-bullying intervention programs globally: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-0007-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of school-bullying prevention programs: An updated meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.001 Google Scholar
Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2021). What works in anti-bullying programs? Analysis of effective intervention components. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garandeau, C. (2021, October). Can positive environments have negative effects? Evidence of a healthy context paradox for victims of school bullying. INVEST Blog. https://blogit.utu.fi/invest/2021/06/10/can-positive-environments-have-negative-effects-evidence-of-a-healthy-context-paradox-for-victims-of-school-bullying/ Google Scholar
Garandeau, C. F., Lee, I. A., & Salmivalli, C. (2018). Decreases in the proportion of bullying victims in the classroom: Effects on the adjustment of remaining victims. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416667492 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garandeau, C. F., & Salmivalli, C. (2019). Can healthier contexts be harmful? A new perspective on the plight of victims of bullying. Child Development Perspectives, 13(3), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gini, G., Holt, M., Pozzoli, T., & Marino, C. (2020). Victimization and somatic problems: The role of class victimization levels. Journal of School Health, 90(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12844 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Angelini, F., Thornberg, R., & Demaray, M. K. (2022). Longitudinal associations of social-cognitive and moral correlates with defending in bullying. Journal of School Psychology, 91, 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.01.005 Google ScholarPubMed
Haataja, A., Sainio, M., Turtonen, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2016). Implementing the KiVa antibullying program: Recognition of stable victims. Educational Psychology, 36(3), 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1066758 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hase, C. N., Goldberg, S. B., Smith, D., Stuck, A., & Campain, J. (2015). Impacts of traditional bullying and cyberbullying on the mental health of middle school and high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 52(6), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21841 Google Scholar
Healy, K. L. (2020). Hypotheses for possible iatrogenic impacts of school bullying prevention programs. Child Development Perspectives, 14(4), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensums, M., de Mooij, B., Kuijper, S. C., BIRC: The Anti-Bullying Interventions Research Consortium, Fekkes, M., & Overbeek, G. (2022). What works for whom in school-based anti-bullying interventions? An individual participant data meta-analysis. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01387-z CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herkama, S., Kontio, M., Sainio, M., Turunen, T., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2022). Facilitators and barriers to the sustainability of a school-based bullying prevention program. Prevention Science, 23, 954–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01368-2 Google Scholar
Herkama, S., Saarento, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2017). The KiVa antibullying program: Lessons learned and future directions. In Sturmey, P. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119057574.whbva124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 677–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.677 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, M. K., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Polanin, J. R., Holland, K. M., DeGue, S., Matjasko, J. L., Wolfe, M., & Reid, G. (2015). Bullying and suicidal ideation and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 135(2), e496–e509. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1864 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huitsing, G., Lodder, G. M. A., Oldenburg, B., Schacter, H. L., Salmivalli, C., Juvonen, J., & Veenstra, R. (2019). The healthy context paradox: Victims’ adjustment during an anti-bullying intervention. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(9), 2499–2509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1194-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huitsing, G., Snijders, T. A. B., van Duijn, M. A. J., & Veenstra, R. (2014). Victims, bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Development and Psychopathology, 26(3), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000297 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70(4), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038928 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johander, E., Turunen, T., Garandeau, C. F., & Salmivalli, C. (2021). Different approaches to address bullying in KiVa schools: Adherence to guidelines, strategies implemented, and outcomes obtained. Prevention Science, 22(3), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01178-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungert, T., Piroddi, B., & Thornberg, R. (2016). Early adolescents’ motivations to defend victims in school bullying and their perceptions of student–teacher relationships: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Adolescence, 53, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.09.001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juvonen, J., Schacter, H. L., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2016). Can a school-wide bullying prevention program improve the plight of victims? Evidence for risk × intervention effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(4), 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000078 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katsaras, G. N., Vouloumanou, E. K., Kourlaba, G., Kyritsi, E., Evagelou, E., & Bakoula, C. (2018). Bullying and suicidality in children and adolescents without predisposing factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adolescent Research Review, 3(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-018-0081-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, T. M. L., Huitsing, G., Bloemberg, R., & Veenstra, R. (2021). The systematic application of network diagnostics to monitor and tackle bullying and victimization in schools. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 3(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-020-00064-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, T. M. L., Kretschmer, T., Huitsing, G., & Veenstra, R. (2018). Why does a universal anti-bullying program not help all children? Explaining persistent victimization during an intervention. Prevention Science, 19(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0906-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, T. M. L., Laninga‐Wijnen, L., & Lodder, G. M. A. (2022). Are victims of bullying primarily social outcasts? Person‐group dissimilarities in relational, socio‐behavioral, and physical characteristics as predictors of victimization. Child Development, 96, 1458–1474. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S13–S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koyanagi, A., Oh, H., Carvalho, A. F., Smith, L., Haro, J. M., Vancampfort, D., Stubbs, B., & DeVylder, J. E. (2019). Bullying victimization and suicide attempt among adolescents aged 12–15 years from 48 countries. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 58(9), 907–918. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2018.10.018 Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, S., Kim, C. J., & Kim, D. H. (2015). A meta-analysis of the effect of school-based anti-bullying programs. Journal of Child Health Care, 19(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493513503581 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodder, G. M. A., Scholte, R. H. J., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Giletta, M. (2016). Bully victimization: Selection and influence within adolescent friendship networks and cliques. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(1), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0343-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas-Molina, B., Giménez-Dasí, M., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., & Pérez-Albéniz, A. (2018). What makes a defender? A multilevel study of individual correlates and classroom norms in explaining defending behaviors. School Psychology Review, 47(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0011.V47-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas-Molina, B., Pérez-Albéniz, A., Solbes-Canales, I., Ortuño-Sierra, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2022). Bullying, cyberbullying and mental health: The role of student connectedness as a school protective factor. Psychosocial Intervention, 31(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2022a1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas‐Molina, B., Williamson, A. A., Pulido, R., & Pérez‐Albéniz, A. (2015). Effects of teacher–student relationships on peer harassment: A multilevel study. Psychology in the Schools, 52(3), 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21822 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín Babarro, J. (2014). Assessment and detection of peer-bullying through analysis of the group context. Psicothema, 26, 357–363. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2014.85 Google ScholarPubMed
Menesini, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2017). Bullying in schools: The state of knowledge and effective interventions. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 22(Suppl. 1), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2017.1279740 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, S. E., Norman, R. E., Suetani, S., Thomas, H. J., Sly, P. D., & Scott, J. G. (2017). Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Psychiatry, 7(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v7.i1.60 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morin, H. K., Bradshaw, C. P., & Kush, J. M. (2018). Adjustment outcomes of victims of cyberbullying: The role of personal and contextual factors. Journal of School Psychology, 70, 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.07.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olweus, D. (1973). Hackkycklingar och översittare: Forskning om skolmobbning [Whipping boys and bullies: Research on bullying at school]. Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Pan, B., Li, T., Ji, L., Malamut, S., Zhang, W., & Salmivalli, C. (2021). Why does classroom‐level victimization moderate the association between victimization and depressive symptoms? The “healthy context paradox” and two explanations. Child Development, 92(5), 1836–1854. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13624 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peets, K., Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Classroom norms of bullying alter the degree to which children defend in response to their affective empathy and power. Developmental Psychology, 51(7), 913–920. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0039287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouwels, J. L., Salmivalli, C., Saarento, S., van den Berg, Y. H. M., Lansu, T. A., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2018). Predicting adolescents’ bullying participation from developmental trajectories of social status and behavior. Child Development, 89(4), 1157–1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12794 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pouwels, J. L., Lansu, T. A. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2016). Participant roles of bullying in adolescence: Status characteristics, social behavior, and assignment criteria. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21614 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rambaran, J. A., Dijkstra, J. K., & Veenstra, R. (2020). Bullying as a group process in childhood: A longitudinal social network analysis. Child Development, 91(4), 1336–1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13298 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Aleva, L., & van der Meulen, M. (2016). Defending victimized peers: Opposing the bully, supporting the victim, or both? Aggressive Behavior, 42(6), 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21653 Google ScholarPubMed
Saarento, S., Kärnä, A., Hodges, E. V., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Student–, classroom–, and school–level risk factors for victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.02.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sainio, M., Herkama, S., Kontio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2019). KiVa anti-bullying programme. In Smith, P. K. (Ed.), Making an impact on school bullying: Interventions and recommendations (pp. 45–66). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781351201957-3 Google Scholar
Sainio, M., Herkama, S., Turunen, T., Rönkkö, M., Kontio, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2020). Sustainable antibullying program implementation: School profiles and predictors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12487 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmivalli, C. (2018). Peer victimization and adjustment in young adulthood: Commentary on the special section. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0372-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmivalli, C., Laninga‐Wijnen, L., Malamut, S. T., & Garandeau, C. F. (2021). Bullying prevention in adolescence: Solutions and new challenges from the past decade. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 1023–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12688 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, M. E., & Bagwell, C. L. (2007). The protective role of friendships in overtly and relationally victimized boys and girls. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53, 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2007.0021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoeler, T., Duncan, L., Cecil, C. M., Ploubidis, G. B., & Pingault, J. B. (2018). Quasi-experimental evidence on short- and long-term consequences of bullying victimization: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(12), 1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sentse, M., Dijkstra, J. K., Salmivalli, C., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2013). The dynamics of friendships and victimization in adolescence: A longitudinal social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21469 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sentse, M., Scholte, R., Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2007). Person–group dissimilarity in involvement in bullying and its relation with social status. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(6), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9150-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sentse, M., Veenstra, R., Kiuru, N., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). A longitudinal multilevel study of individual characteristics and classroom norms in explaining bullying behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(5), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9949-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sijtsema, J. J., Rambaran, A. J., & Ojanen, T. J. (2013). Overt and relational victimization and adolescent friendships: Selection, de-selection, and social influence. Social Influence, 8(2–3), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.739097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjögren, B., Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., & Gini, G. (2021). Bystander behaviour in peer victimisation: Moral disengagement, defender self-efficacy and student-teacher relationship quality. Research Papers in Education, 36(5), 588–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1723679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. K. (2019). Introduction. In Smith, P. K. (Ed.), Making an impact on school bullying: Interventions and recommendations (pp. 1–22). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsaousis, I. (2016). The relationship of self-esteem to bullying perpetration and peer victimization among schoolchildren and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., & Pozzoli, T. (2017). Peer victimisation and its relation to class relational climate and class moral disengagement. Educational Psychology, 37, 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1150423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornberg, R., Wegmann, B., Wänström, L., Bjereld, Y., & Hong, J. S. (2022). Associations between student–teacher relationship quality, class climate, and bullying roles: A Bayesian multilevel multinomial logit analysis. Victims & Offenders. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2022.2051107 Google Scholar
Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Geel, M., Goemans, A., Zwaanswijk, W., Gini, G., & Vedder, P. (2018). Does peer victimization predict low self-esteem, or does low self-esteem predict peer victimization? Meta-analyses on longitudinal studies. Developmental Review, 49, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, B. (1986). An attribution theory of motivation and emotion. Springer-VerlagInc. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. C., Giammarino, M., & Parad, H. W. (1986). Social status in small groups: Individual–group similarity and the social “misfit”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeager, D. S., Fong, C. J., Lee, H. Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2015). Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young-Jones, A., Fursa, S., Byrket, J. S., & Sly, J. S. (2015). Bullying affects more than feelings: The long-term implications of victimization on academic motivation in higher education. Social Psychology of Education, 18(1), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9287-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yun, H.-Y. (2020). New approaches to defender and outsider roles in school bullying. Child Development, 91(4), e814–e832. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13312 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yun, H.-Y., & Graham, S. (2018). Defending victims of bullying in early adolescence: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(9), 1926–1937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0869-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yun, H.-Y., & Juvonen, J. (2020). Navigating the healthy context paradox: Identifying classroom characteristics that improve the psychological adjustment of bullying victims. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(11), 2203–2213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01300-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed