Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:03:12.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Group and Individual Change in the Treatment of Drug Addictions: A Follow-up Study in Therapeutic Communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

José Javier López-Goñi ,
Javier Fernández-Montalvo ,
Juan Carlos Menéndez ,
Fausto Yudego ,
Angel Rico García  and
Sonia Esarte
José Javier López-Goñi*
Affiliation:
Universidad Pública de Navarra (Spain)
Javier Fernández-Montalvo
Affiliation:
Universidad Pública de Navarra (Spain)
Juan Carlos Menéndez
Affiliation:
Fundación Centro Español Solidaridad Principado de Asturias (Spain)
Fausto Yudego
Affiliation:
Fundación Proyecto Hombre de Navarra (Spain)
Angel Rico García
Affiliation:
Fundación Centro Español Solidaridad Principado de Asturias (Spain)
Sonia Esarte
Affiliation:
Fundación Proyecto Hombre de Navarra (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to José Javier López-Goñi. Departamento de Psicología y Pedagogía Universidad Pública de Navarra. 31006 Pamplona. (Spain). Phone: +34-948169857. Fax: +34-948169891. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The pre-post treatment change of 112 patients in two therapeutics Spanish communities is described. The Addiction Severity Index (ASI) was used at intake and at the end of the treatment program. Results of the treatment program were evaluated by applying composite scores (CS) of the ASI, and the evolution of each patient was evaluated using the Reliable Change Index (RCI). 69.7% of the sample completed treatment, and 30.3% dropped out prematurely. At intake, the percentage of people who could improve in the different areas of the ASI ranged between 35.1% for alcohol consumption and 95.3% for family relationships. At the follow-up, the percentage of subjects who showed significant statistical improvements in the different areas varied between 7.9% in family relations and 66.7% in alcohol consumption. The percentage of patients who deteriorated was less than 10% for all variables. Implications for further research and clinical practice are commented upon.

En este artículo se describe la evolución pre-post tratamiento de una muestra de 112 pacientes atendidos en dos comunidades terapéuticas españolas. La evaluación de la muestra se llevó a cabo con el Addiction Severity Index (ASI) tanto al inicio como a la finalización del tratamiento. En el análisis de los resultados del tratamiento se utilizaron las puntuaciones compuestas del ASI, y la evolución de cada paciente se valoró con el Índice de Cambio Fiable (ICF). El 69,7% de la muestra finalizó el programa de tratamiento, y el 30,3% lo abandonó. En el momento del ingreso, el porcentaje de personas que necesitaba tratamiento en cada área del ASI variaba entre el 35,1% en el consumo de alcohol y el 95,3% en las relaciones familiares. En el seguimiento, el porcentaje de sujetos que mostraba mejorías estadísticamente significativas variaba entre el 7,9% en el área familiar y el 66,7% en el consumo de alcohol. El porcentaje de sujetos que empeoraba era menor del 10% en todas las áreas. Se discuten las implicaciones de estos resultados tanto para posteriores investigaciones como para la práctica clínica.

Keywords

addictionstherapeutic communitysecondary outcomesfollow-upadiccionescomunidad terapéuticabeneficios secundariosseguimiento
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , November 2010 , pp. 906 - 913
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bobes, J., González, M. P., Sáiz, P. A., & Bousoño, M. (1996). Índice Europeo de Severidad de la Adicción: EuropASI. Versión española. Actas de la IV Reunión Interregional de Psiquiatría, 201–218.Google Scholar
Bodin, M. C., & Romelsjo, A. (2006). Predictors of abstinence and nonproblem drinking after 12-step treatment in Sweden. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 139–146.Google Scholar
Bodin, M. C., & Romelsjo, A. (2007). Secondary outcomes: Group and individual change and relationships to drinking outcomes. Addiction Research & Theory, 15, 587–599.Google Scholar
Comas, D. (2006). Comunidades Terapéuticas en España. Situación actual y propuesta funcional. Madrid: Grupo GID.Google Scholar
Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Crabtree, A., Jacobi, J., & Armstrong, S. (2003). Outcome from integrated pain management treatment for recovering substance abusers. The Journal of Pain, 4, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daeppen, J. B., Burnand, B., Schnyder, C., Bonjour, M., Pe'coud, A., & Yersin, B. (1996). Validation of the Addiction Severity Index in French-speaking alcoholic patients. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 585–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edelen, M. A., Miles, J. N. V., Osilla, K. C., & Wenzel, S. L. (2008). Further validity evidence for the Dimensions of Change in therapeutic community treatment instrument. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 34, 285–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez-Hermida, J. R., Secades-Villa, R., Fernandez-Ludena, J. J., & Marina-Gonzalez, P. A. (2002). Effectiveness of a therapeutic community treatment in Spain: A long-term follow-up study. European Addiction Research, 8, 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Montalvo, J., Landa, N., López-Goñi, J. J., & Lorea, I. (2006). Personality disorders in alcoholics: A comparative pilot study between the IPDE and the MCMI-II. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 1442–1448.Google Scholar
Fernández-Montalvo, J., López-Goñi, J. J., Illescas, C., Landa, N., & Lorea, I. (2008). Evaluation of a therapeutic community treatment of addictions: A long-term follow-up study in Spain. Substance Use & Misuse, 43, 1362–1377.Google Scholar
Fernández-Montalvo, J., López-Goñi, J. J., Landa, N., Illescas, C., Lorea, I., & Zarzuela, A. (2004). Trastornos de personalidad y abandonos terapéuticos en pacientes adictos: resultados en una comunidad terapéutica. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 4, 271–283.Google Scholar
Jacobson, N. S., Roberts, L. J., Berns, S. B., & McGlinchey, J. B. (1999). Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: Description, application and alternatives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 300–307.Google Scholar
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.Google Scholar
Kokkevi, A., & Hartgers, C. (1995). European adaptation of a multidimensional assessment instrument for drug and alcohol dependence. European Addiction Research, 1, 208–210.Google Scholar
López-Goñi, J. J., Fernández-Montalvo, J., Illescas, C., Landa, N., & Lorea, I. (2008). Determining socio-demographic predictors of treatment dropout: Results in a therapeutic community. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17, 374–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLellan, A. T., Luborsky, L., Cacciola, J., Griffith, J., Evans, F., Barr, H. L. et al. , (1985). New data from the Addiction Severity Index. Reliability and validity in three centers. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173, 412–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLellan, A. T., Luborsky, L., Woody, G. E., & O' Brien, C. P. (1980). An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 168, 26–33.Google Scholar
Mäkelä, K. (2004). Studies of the reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index. Addiction, 99, 398–410.Google Scholar
Ravndal, E., Vaglum, P., & Lauritzen, G. (2005). Completion of long-term inpatient treatment of drug abusers: A prospective study from 13 different units. European Addiction Research, 11, 180–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., Broome, K. M., Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., & Rowan-Szal, G. A. (1997). Program diversity and treatment retention rates in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 279–293.Google Scholar
Slaymaker, V. J., & Owen, P. L. (2006). Employed men and women substance abusers: Job troubles and treatment outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 347–354.Google Scholar
Webster, J. M., Staton-Tindall, M., Duvall, J. L., Garrity, T. F., & Leukefeld, C. G. (2007). Measuring Employment Among Substance-Using Offenders. Substance Use & Misuse, 42, 1187–1205.Google Scholar