Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:17:53.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Machiavellianism to Unethical Behavior: A Cross-Level Examination of Cultural Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2021

Ghulam Hussain Open the ORCID record for Ghulam Hussain [Opens in a new window] ,
Farah Samreen ,
Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail ,
Amir Riaz  and
Johaver Azhar Open the ORCID record for Johaver Azhar [Opens in a new window]
Ghulam Hussain
Affiliation:
COMSATS University Islamabad Lahore Campus (Pakistan)
Farah Samreen*
Affiliation:
University of Engineering & Technology (Pakistan)
Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail
Affiliation:
Sulaiman AlRajhi University (Saudi Arabia)
Amir Riaz
Affiliation:
COMSATS University Islamabad Lahore Campus (Pakistan)
Johaver Azhar
Affiliation:
COMSATS University Islamabad Lahore Campus (Pakistan)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Farah Samreen. University of Engineering &Technology. Institute of Business & Management IBM. 54890 Lahore, Punjab (Pakistan). Phone: +92–3329919928. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study establishes the relationship between a manager’s Machiavellian personality and unethical behavior. It also tests the cross-level interaction effects of collectivism and power distance on the relationship between a Machiavellian personality and unethical behavior. The multi-level and multi-source data are collected from 22 public sector organizations from which 202 responses from managers about their personalities, power distance, and collectivism, and 626 subordinates’ ratings of the managers’ unethical behavior were received and used. The results show that Machiavellian personality has a positive relationship with unethical behavior. The cross-level interaction effects also show that cultural dimensions such as power distance, and collectivism—significantly and positively moderate the relationship between Machiavellian personality and unethical behavior. Based on the study’s findings, implications for theory and practice are offered.

Keywords

cultural factorsleadershipMachiavellianismunethical behaviors
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 24 , 2021 , e46
Copyright
© Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Funding Statement: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2003). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 1–17. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Analoui, F. (1995). Workplace sabotage: Its styles, motives and management. Journal of Management Development, 14(7), 48–65. http://doi.org/10.1108/02621719510097361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47(7), 755–778. http://doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, J. A. H., & O’Hair, H. D. (2007). Machiavellians’ motives in organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35(3), 246–267. http://doi.org/10.1080/00909880701434232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289. http://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105278021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereczkei, T., & Czibor, A. (2014). Personality and situational factors differently influence high Mach and low Mach persons’ decisions in a social dilemma game. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 168–173. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Braibanti, R. (1965). Pakistan: Constitutional issues in 1964. Asian Survey. http://doi.org/10.2307/2642484 (“Reprinted from Pakistan: Constitutional issues in 1964,” 1936, Far Eastern Survey, 5(2), 79–87).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. E., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Ethical and unethical leadership: Exploring new avenues for future research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(4), 583–616. http://doi.org/10.5840/beq201020439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chêne, M. (2008). Overview of corruption in Pakistan, Anti-Corruption Resource Centre & Transparency International. https://www.u4.no/publications/overview-of-corruption-in-pakistan.pdfGoogle Scholar
Christie, R. (1970). Scale construction. In Christie, R. & Geis, F. (Eds.), Studies in Machiavellianism (pp. 10–34). Academic Press. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-174450-2.50007-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cosans, C. E., & Reina, C. S. (2018). The leadership ethics of Machiavelli’s prince. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2017.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cray, D., & Mallory, G. (1998). Making sense of managing culture. International Thomson Business Press.Google Scholar
Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35(2), 219–257. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahling, J. J., Kuyumcu, D., & Librizzi, E. H. (2012). Machiavellianism, unethical behavior, and well-being in organizational life. In Giacalone, R. A. & Promislo, M. D. (Eds.), Handbook of unethical work behavior: Implications for individual well-being (pp. 183–194). M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, J. H., & Ruhe, J. A. (2003). Perceptions of country corruption: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023038901080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 127–150.Google Scholar
Faisal, F., & Jafri, A. R. (2017). Corruption as a source of failure of good governance and management in Pakistan: Proposed remedial measures. Journal of the Punjab University Historical Society, 30(1), 57–75.Google Scholar
Fang, R., & Lim, V. K. (2002, December 10–13). Collectivism, Machiavellianism, perceived organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: An empirical study of Chinese employees. [Paper presentation] The 2nd International Conference on Electronic Business, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. C., & Weitz, B. A. (1991). From the invisible hand to the gladhand: Understanding a careerist orientation to work. Human Resource Management, 30(2), 237–257. http://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930300206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getz, K. A., & Volkema, R. J. (2001). Culture, perceived corruption, and economics: A model of predictors and outcomes. Business & Society, 40(1), 7–30. http://doi.org/10.1177/000765030104000103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacalone, R. A., & Knouse, S. B. (1990). Justifying wrongful employee behavior: The role of personality in organizational sabotage. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(1), 55–61. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601–616. http://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granitz, N. A. (2003). Individual, social and organizational sources of sharing and variation in the ethical reasoning of managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(2), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021973305783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, R. L., Hill, A., Mawritz, M. B., & Quade, M. J. (2017). Employee Machiavellianism to unethical behavior: The role of abusive supervision as a trait activator. Journal of Management, 43(2), 585–609. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314535434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürlek, M. (2020). Shedding light on the relationships between Machiavellianism, career ambition, and unethical behavior intention. Ethics & Behavior, 31(1), 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1764846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7thEd.). Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hauser, C., Simonyan, A., & Werner, A. (2020). Condoning corrupt behavior at work: What roles do Machiavellianism, on-the-job experience, and neutralization play? Business & Society, 60, 1468–1506. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, W. H., & Sims, H. P. (1978). Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: An experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 451–457. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, W. H., & Sims, H. P. (1979). Organizational philosophy, policies, and objectives related to unethical decision behavior: A laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(3), 331–338. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.3.331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723–744. http://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modelling to organizational research. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 467–511). Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21. http://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Huang, Z.-w., Liu, L., Zheng, W.-w., Tan, X.-y., & Zhao, X. (2015). Walking the straight and narrow: The moderating effect of evaluation apprehension on the relationship between collectivism and corruption. PLOS ONE, 10(3), Article e0123859. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123859Google ScholarPubMed
Huntington, S. P. (1979). Africa: Causes, consequences, and controls (pp. 313–324). University Press of America.Google Scholar
Islam, N. (2004). Sifarish, sycophants, power and collectivism: Administrative culture in Pakistan. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2), 311–330. http://doi.org/10.1177/0020852304044259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. L., Colquitt, J. A., Wesson, M. J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2006). Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 884–899. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.884CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Javidan, M., House, R. J., Dorfman, P. W., Hanges, P. J., & de Luque, M. S. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: A comparative review of GLOBE’s and Hofstede’s approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 897–914. http://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, C., & Panda, B. (2017). Individualism and corruption: A cross-country analysis. Economic Papers, 36(1), 60–74. http://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. http://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In Leary, M. R. & Hoyle, R. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S. (1997). Further validation of the Perceptions of Politics Scale (Pops): A multiple sample investigation. Journal of Management, 23(5), 627–658. http://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing a measure of unethical behavior in the workplace: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management, 34(5), 978–1008. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multivlevel modeling. Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuenzi, M., Mayer, D. M., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2020). Creating an ethical organizational environment: The relationship between ethical leadership, ethical organizational climate, and unethical behavior. Personnel Psychology, 73(1), 43–71 http://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. http://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehnert, K., Craft, J., Singh, N., & Park, Y.-H. (2016). The human experience of ethics: A review of a decade of qualitative ethical decision‐making research. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(4), 498–537. http://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Tan, X., Huang, Z., & Liu, L. (2019). Relationship between collectivism and corruption in American and Chinese books: A historical perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 180–187. http://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12447CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., & Brown, D. J. (2012). Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 107–123. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024610CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, Y. (2005). An organizational perspective of corruption. Management and Organization Review, 1(1), 119–154. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2004.00006.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Hwang, H. S. (2013). Culture. In Keith, K. D. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology : Vol. 1. Wiley Blackwell. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339893.wbeccp142Google Scholar
Modesto, J. G., & Pilati, R. (2020). “Why are the corrupt, corrupt?” The multilevel analytical model of corruption. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 23, Article E5. http://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2020.5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neill, J. D., Stovall, O. S., & Jinkerson, D. L. (2005). A critical analysis of the accounting industry’s voluntary code of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3398-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberg, P. R. (1995). Judging the state: Courts and constitutional politics in Pakistan. Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511563362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberg, P. R. (2002). Judging the state: Courts and constitutional politics in Pakistan (Vol. 59). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newberg, P. R. (2014). Governing Pakistan. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 41(4), 159–171. http://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2014.970925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychological theory. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta‐analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five‐factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 644–664. http://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–432. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pillay, S., & Dorasamy, N. (2010). Linking cultural dimensions with the nature of corruption: An institutional theory perspective. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10(3), 363–378. http://doi.org/10.1177/1470595810389793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139962933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 1–37.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Palomino, P., & Linuesa-Langreo, J. (2018). Implications of person—situation interactions for Machiavellians’ unethical tendencies: The buffering role of managerial ethical leadership. European Management Journal, 36(2), 243–253. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholl, W., & Schermuly, C. C. (2020). The impact of culture on corruption, gross domestic product, and human development. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(1), 171–189. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3977-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517.http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiel, C. E., Hardy, J. H. III, Peterson, D. R., Welsh, D. T., & Bonner, J. M. (2018). Too many sheep in the flock? Span of control attenuates the influence of ethical leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12), 1324–1334. http://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Transparency International Pakistan. (2020). Country data; Corruption perception index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzl#Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1995). A theoretical framework for the study of diversity. In Chemers, M. M., Oskamp, S., & Costanzo, M. A. (Eds.), Claremont symposium on applied social psychology , Vol. 8 . Diversity in organizations: New perspectives for a changing workplace (p. 11–36). Sage Publications, Inc. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243405.n2Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118–128. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323–338. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tse, H. H. M., & Dasborough, M. T. (2008). A study of exchange and emotions in team member relationships. Group & Organization Management, 33(2), 194–215. http://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106293779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2005). Can business effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1143–1158. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ünal, A. F., Warren, D. E., & Chen, C. C. (2012). The normative foundations of unethical supervision in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 5–19. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1300-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2003). Misbehavior in organizations: Theory, research, and management. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, D. E. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 622–632. http://doi.org/10.2307/30040751Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S., Near, D., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 285–299. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.285CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfson, S. L. (1981). Effects of Machiavellianism and communication on helping behavior during an emergency. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20(3), 189–195. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1981.tb00531.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, P.-C., & Chaturvedi, S. (2009). The role of procedural justice and power distance in the relationship between high performance work systems and employee attitudes: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Management, 35(5), 1228–1247. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308331097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J., Mossholder, K. W., & Peng, T. K. (2007). Procedural justice climate and group power distance: An examination of cross-level interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 681–692. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.681CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahra, S. A., Priem, R. L., & Rasheed, A. A. (2005). The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. Journal of Management, 31(6), 803–828. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, X., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Kwok, C. C. Y. (2012). National culture and corporate debt maturity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(2), 468–488. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar