Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:05:16.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Affecting Foster Care Breakdown in Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Mónica López López ,
Jorge F. del Valle ,
Carme Montserrat  and
Amaia Bravo
Mónica López López
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
Jorge F. del Valle*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
Carme Montserrat
Affiliation:
Universidad de Girona (Spain)
Amaia Bravo
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jorge F. del Valle. Facultad de Psicología. Plaza Feijoo s/n. 33012 Oviedo. (Spain). Phone: +34-985103246. Fax: +34-985104141. E-mail.: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Breakdown of foster care has been defined as the situation in which one of the involved parties terminates the intervention before having achieved the goals established for the case plan. This work presents a study carried out with a Spanish sample of 318 closed cases of children who were placed in foster homes and kinship care. The data were collected through the exhaustive review of the child protection and foster placement files, complemented with interviews of the welfare workers in charge of each case. The rate of breakdown of the entire sample was 26.1%, although it was significantly different in kinship care (19.7%) and foster care (31.2%). The results of this study indicate that the variables related to breakdown depend on the placement modality, either in foster care or kinship care. In the first case, the variables related to the child's characteristics are noteworthy, especially behavior and academic problems, with special relevance in the 9-12-year-old group, and in children who were previously in residential care. In contrast, in kinship care, the parents' problems (prison, mental health) and having some measure of guardianship are the most important. The fact of undergoing foster placement after having lived in various residential homes is transcendental. Lastly, the availability of economic resources and even the foster carers' studies seem to be related to foster breakdown.

La ruptura del acogimiento familiar se ha definido como aquella situación en la que alguna de las partes implicadas causa una terminación de la intervención antes de haber alcanzado los objetivos establecidos en el plan de caso. Este trabajo presenta un estudio llevado a cabo en una muestra española de 318 casos cerrados de niños que fueron acogidos en familia ajena y extensa. Los datos se obtuvieron a través de la revisión exhaustiva de los expedientes de protección y acogimiento, complementada con entrevistas a los técnicos encargados de cada caso. La tasa de ruptura del conjunto de la muestra fue de 26,1%, si bien fue significativamente diferente en familia extensa (19,7%) que en familia ajena (31,2%). Los resultados de este estudio indican que las variables relacionadas con la ruptura dependen de la modalidad del acogimiento, en familia ajena o extensa. En el primer caso destacamos las variables relacionadas con las características del niño, especialmente los problemas de conducta y escolares, con especial relevancia en el grupo de 9-12 años, y el haber estado en acogimiento residencial previamente. En cambio, en extensa resulta más importante la problemática en los padres (prisión, salud mental) y el tener una medida de tutela. También el hecho de que se realice el acogimiento tras pasar por hogares de acogida resulta trascendental. Finalmente, la disponibilidad de recursos económicos e incluso los estudios de los acogedores parecen ser variables relacionadas con la ruptura de la acogida.

Keywords

foster carekinship carechild careoutcome assessmentdisruptionbreakdownplacement stabilityacogimiento familiarfamilia extensafamilia ajenaprotección infantilevaluación de resultadosrupturapermanencia
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , May 2011 , pp. 111 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldgate, J., & Hawley, D. (1986). Preventing disruption in long-term foster care. Adoption and Fostering, 10, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, J. G., Delfabbro, P. H., & Cooper, L. L. (2001). The predictors of unsuccessful transition to foster care. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 785–790. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00775CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barth, R., & Berry, M. (1988). Adoption and disruption: Rates, risks and responses. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Berridge, D. (1997). Foster care: A research review. London, UK: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Berridge, D., & Cleaver, H. (1987). Foster home breakdown. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Berry, M., & Barth, R. P. (1990). A study of disrupted adoptive placements of adolescents. Child Welfare, 69, 209–225.Google ScholarPubMed
Biehal, N., Clayden, J., Stein, M., & Wade, J. (1995). Moving on: Young people and leaving care schemes. London, UK: HMSO.Google Scholar
Bravo, A., & Del Valle, J.F. (2009). Crisis and review of residential child care. Its role in child protection. Papeles del Psicólogo, 30, 42–52.Google Scholar
Brown, J., & Calder, P. (1999). Concept mapping the challenges faced by foster parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 21, 481-495. doi:10.1016/S0190-7409(99)00034-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cautley, P. W. (1980). New foster parents: The first experience. New York, NY: Human Services Press.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, P. (1990). Comparative evaluation of specialized foster care for seriously delinquent youths: A first step. Community Alternatives: International Journal of Family Care, 2, 21–36.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, P., Leve, L. D., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2007). Multidimensional treatment foster care for girls in the juvenile justice system: 2-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 187–193. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.1.187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamberlain, P., Price, J. M., Reid, J. B., Landsverk, J., Fisher, P. A., & Stoolmiller, M. (2006). Who disrupts from placement in foster and kinship care? Child Abuse and Neglect, 30, 409–424. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.11.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chipungu, S. S., & Everett, J. E. (1994). The power of information: Exchange patterns between African-American foster parents and child welfare workers. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 3, 17–33. doi:10.1300/J285v03n03_02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, C. S., Peterson, N. L., & Meier, J. H. (1987). Variables associated with disrupted placement in a select sample of abused and neglected children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 11, 75–86. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(87)90035-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtney, M., & Barth, R. (1996). Pathways of older adolescents out of foster care: Implications for independent living services. Social Work, 41, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Valle, J. F., Álvarez-Baz, E., & Bravo, A. (2002). Acogimiento en familia extensa. Perfil descriptivo y evaluación de necesidades en una muestra del Principado de Asturias [Kinship foster care. Descriptive profile and needs assessment in a sample from the Principality of Asturias]. Bienestar y Protección Infantil, 1, 34–56.Google Scholar
Del Valle, J. F., & Bravo, A. (2002). Maltrato infantil: situación actual y respuestas sociales [Child abuse: current status and social responses]. Psicothema, 14, 118–123.Google Scholar
Del Valle, J. F., & Bravo, A. (2003). La situación del acogimiento familiar en España [Situation of foster care in Spain]. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales. Retrieved from: http://www.gifi.es/admin/publicaciones/archives/77025_Acogimiento_2003.pdfGoogle Scholar
Del Valle, J. F., Bravo, A., & López, M., (2009). El acogimiento familiar en España: implantación y retos actuales [Foster care in Spain. Its stablishment and current challenges]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 30, 33–41.Google Scholar
Del Valle, J. F., López, M., Montserrat, C., & Bravo, A. (2008). El acogimiento familiar en España. Una evaluación de resultados [Foster care in Spain. An outcome assessment]. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales. Retrieved from: http://www.gifi.es/admin/publicaciones/archives/3920_El_acogimiento.pdf.Google Scholar
Del Valle, J. F., López, M., Montserrat, C., & Bravo, A. (2009). Twenty years of foster care in Spain: Profiles, patterns and outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 847–853. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drapeau, S., Simard, M., Beaudry, M., & Chardonneau, C. (2000). Siblings in family transitions. Family Relations, 49, 77–85. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00077.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckenrode, J., Rowe, E., Laird, M., & Brathwaite, J. (1995). Mobility as a mediator of the effects of child maltreatment on academic performance. Child Development, 66, 1130–1142. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00927.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanshel, D., Finch, S. J., & Grundy, J. F. (1990). Foster children in a life course perspective. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, E. R. G. (2009). Placement stability in kinship care. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 4, 154–160. doi:10.1080/17450120902887871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, E., Lipscome, J., & Moyers, S. (2005). Foster carer strain and its impact on parenting and placement outcomes for adolescents. British Journal of Social Work, 35, 237–253. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, E. R. G., & Moyers, S. (2008). Kinship care: Fostering effective family and friends placements. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Festinger, T. (1983). No one ever asked us: A postscript to foster care. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, T., Gibbs, I., Sinclair, I., & Wilson, K. (2000). Sharing the care: The qualities sought of social workers by foster carers. Child and Family Social Work, 5, 225–233. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2206.2000.00165.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fratter, J., Rowe, J., Sapsford, D., & Thoburn, J. (1991). Permanent family placement: A decade of experience. London, UK: BAAF.Google Scholar
George, V. (1970). Foster care: Theory and practice. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan.Google Scholar
Gilbertson, R., & Barber, J. G. (2003). Breakdown of foster care placement: Carer perspectives and system factors. Australian Social Work, 56, 329–339. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0748.2003.00095.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleeson, J., & Hairston, F. C. (1999). Kinship care: Improving practice through research. Washington, DC: CWLA Press.Google Scholar
Gries, L. T., Goh, D. S., Andrews, M. B., Gilbert, J., Praver, F., & Stelzer, D. N. (2000). Positive reaction to disclosure and recovery from child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 9, 29–51. doi:10.1300/J070v09n01_03CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwin, J., Owen, M., Locke, R., & Forrester, D. (2001). Making care orders work: A study of care plans and their implementation. London, UK: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Heller, S. S., Smyke, A. T., & Boris, N. W. (2002). Very young foster children and foster families: Clinical challenges and interventions. Infant Mental Health Journal, 23, 555–575. doi:10.1002/imhj.10033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J., Nutter, R. W., & Galaway, B. (1994). Treatment foster family care: Development and current status. Community Alternatives: International Journal of Family Care, 6, 1–24.Google Scholar
James, S., Landsverk, J., & Slymen, D. J. (2004). Placement movement in out-of-home care: Patterns and predictors. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 185–206. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J. M., & Palacios, J. (2008). El acogimiento familiar en Andalucía: Procesos familiares, perfiles personales [Foster care in Andalusia: Family processes, personal profiles]. Granada, Spain: Junta de Andalucía.Google Scholar
Kalland, M., & Sinkkonen, J. (2001). Finnish children in foster care: Evaluating the breakdown of long-term placements. Child Welfare, 80, 513–527.Google ScholarPubMed
Laan, N. M. A., Loots, G. M. P., Janssen, C. G. C., & Stolk, J. (2001). Foster care for children with mental retardation and challenging behavior: A follow-up study. British Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 47, 3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leathers, S. J. (2006). Placement disruption and negative placement outcomes among adolescents in long-term foster care: The role of behavior problems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 307–324. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.09.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, L., Gordon, J., Meneken, L., Premji, K., Michelmore, K., & Ganger, W. (2005). The physical, developmental, and mental health needs of young children in child welfare by initial placement type. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 26, 177–185. doi:10.1097/00004703-200506000-00003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, T., Lieberman, A., Partridge, S., & Hornby, H. (1991). Assessing the role of agency services in reducing adoption disruptions. Children and Youth Services Review, 13, 425–438. doi:10.1016/0190-7409(91)90030-LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mech, E., Ludy-Dobson, C., & Hulseman, F. S. (1994). Life-skills knowledge: A survey of foster adolescents in three placement settings. Children and Youth Services Review, 16, 181–200. doi:10.1016/0190-7409(94)90005-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milan, S. E., & Pinderhughes, E. E. (2000). Factors influencing maltreated children's early adjustment in foster care. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 63–81. doi:10.1017/S0954579400001048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millham, S., Bullock, R., Hosie, K., & Haak, M. (1986). Lost in care: The problems of maintaining links between children in care and their families. Aldershot, UK: Gower.Google Scholar
Minty, B. (1999). Outcomes in long-term foster family care. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 991–999. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00518CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montserrat, C. (2007). Kinship foster care: A study from the perspective of the caregivers, the children and the child welfare workers. Psychology in Spain, 11, 42–52.Google Scholar
Montserrat, C., & Casas, F. (2006). Kinship foster care from the perspective of quality of life: Research on the satisfaction of the stakeholders. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 227–237. doi:10.1007/s11482-007-9018-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napier, H. (1972). Success and failure in foster care. British Journal of Social Work, 2, 187–204.Google Scholar
Newton, R. R., Litrownik, A. J., & Landsverk, J. A. (2000). Children and youth in foster care: Disentangling the relationship between problem behaviors and number of placements. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 1363–1374. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00189-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oosterman, M., Schuengel, C., Slot, N. W., Bullens, R. A. R., & Doreleijers, T. A. H. (2007). Disruptions in foster care: A review and meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 53–76. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacios, J. (1995). Los datos del maltrato infantil en España: una visión en conjunto [Data on child abuse in Spain: An overview]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 18, 69–75. doi:10.1174/02103709560575497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, S. E. (1996). Placement stability and inclusive practice in foster care: An empirical analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 18, 589–601. doi:10.1016/0190-7409(96)00025-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardeck, J. (1984). An exploration of factors associated with the stability and continuity of the foster care system in the United States. International Social Work, 27 5–9. doi:10.1177/002087288402700103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. (1966). Decision in child care: A study of prediction in fostering. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Patten, P. (2005). Foster carers. Why they stay and why they leave. Child Care in Practice, 11, 92–94.Google Scholar
Proch, K., & Taber, M. A. (1985). Placement disruption: A review of research. Children and Youth Services Review, 7, 309–320. doi:10.1016/S0190-7409(85)80004-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, H. (1996). The effects of a health newsletter for foster parents on their perceptions of the behaviour and development of foster children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 437–445. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(96)00018-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, J., Cain, H., Hundleby, M., & Garnett, L. (1989). Child care now. London, UK: BAAF.Google Scholar
Sallnäs, M., Vinnerljung, B., & Westermark, P. K. (2004). Breakdown of teenage placements in Swedish foster and residential care. Child and Family Social Work, 9, 141–152. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2004.00309.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, I. M., Ortega, R., Guo, S., & Fishman, G. (1994). Infants in non permanent placement. Social Service Review, 68, 405–416. doi:10.1086/604066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, I., & Wilson, K. (2003). Matches and mismatches: The contribution of carers and children to the success of foster placements. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 871–884. doi:10.1093/bjsw/33.7.871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. C. (1994). Child rearing practices associated with better developmental outcomes in preschool-age foster children. Child Study Journal, 24, 299–326.Google Scholar
Stern, S. B., & Smith, C. A. (1999). Reciprocal relationships between antisocial behavior and parenting: Implications for delinquency intervention. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 80, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, N. M., & Stone, S. F. (1983). The prediction of successful foster placement. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 64, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terling-Watt, T. (2001). Permanency in kinship care: An exploration of disruption rates and factors associated with placement disruption. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 111–126. doi:10.1016/S0190-7409(01)00129-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. W., Authier, K., & Ruma, P. (1994). Behavior problems of sexually abused children in foster care: A preliminary study. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 3, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, M. B., & Swart, M. D. (1992). Risk and protective factors affecting children in foster care: A pilot study of the role of siblings. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 37, 616–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trasler, G. (1960). In place of parents. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Vanderfaeillie, J., Van Holen, F., & Coussens, S. (2008). Why do foster care placements break down? An study into the factors influencing foster care placement breakdown in Flanders. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 11, 77–88.Google Scholar
Wade, J., Biehal, N., Clayden, J., & Stein, M. (1998). Going missing: Young people absent from care. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. A., & Walsh, R. A. (1990). Studies of the maintenance of subsidized foster placements in the Casey Family Program. Child Welfare, 69, 99–114.Google ScholarPubMed
Webster, D., Barth, R. P., & Needell, B. (2000). Placement stability for children in out-of-home care: A longitudinal analysis. Child Welfare, 79, 614–632.Google Scholar
Widom, C. S. (1991). The role of placement experiences in mediating the criminal consequences of early childhood victimization. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 195–209. doi:10.1037/h0079252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed