Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:39:11.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The DiViSA’s Predictive Validity by Age: An Objective Online Test of Attention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2015

J. Santacreu  and
M. A. Quiroga
J. Santacreu*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
M. A. Quiroga
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Dr. J. Santacreu. Dpto. Psicología Biológica y de la Salud. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Calle Pavlov, 6. 28049. Madrid (Spain). Fax: +34–914975184. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the DiViSA’s predictive validity in school-age children. To do so, two groups of school-age children were compared: one with low school achievement (N = 1,174), and one with typical development (N = 1,426). The obtained results show that: (1) in all grades, children with poor school performance exhibited lower levels of attention and task organization, greater hastiness, and made more commission errors; (2) the combination of variables that best differentiated between groups was not the same in all grades; (3) level of organization improved with age in the low-school-achievement group, and did not in the typical-development group; (4) the data regarding sensitivity (81% to 93%) and specificity (79% to 90%), for the first time computed for each grade separately, support the test’s predictive validity in the grades we evaluated. The discussion focuses on the DiViSA test’s usefulness in diagnosing attention problems. It is the first computerized test to include separate scores for: (a) how children complete the task (organization) and (2) the source of their errors (distraction or hastiness).

Keywords

attention testADHDdistractionhastinessorganization
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 18 , 2015 , E98
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Botella, J., & Barriopedro, M. I. (1999). El estudio experimental de la atención [Experimental research in attention]. In Munar, E., Roselló, J., & Sánchez-Cabaco, A. (Coords.), Atención y percepción [Attention and perception]. Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
Brickenkamp, R. (2002). D2, test de atención [D2, test of attention]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones. (Original work published 1962)Google Scholar
Cardó, E., Servera, M., & Llobera, J. (2007). Estimación de la prevalencia del trastorno por déficit de atención e hiperactividad en población normal de la isla de Mallorca [Estimated prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a normal population on the island of Mallorca]. Revista de Neurología, 44, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardó, E., & Servera-Barceló, M. (2005). Prevalencia del trastorno de déficit de atención e hiperactividad [Prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder]. Revista de Neurologia, 40(1), S11–S15.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1979). Adolescent age trends in primary personality factors measured in T-data: A contribution to use of standardized measures in practice. Journal of Adolescence, 2(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conners, K. C. (2004). Conners Continuous Performance Test (2nd Ed.). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Cornish, K. M., Wilding, J. M., & Hollis, C. (2008). Visual search performance in children rated as good or poor attenders: The differential impact of DAT1 genotype, IQ, and chronological age. Neuropsychology, 22, 217–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.22.2.217 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diaz-Orueta, U., Iriarte, Y., Climent, G., & Banterla, F. (2012). AULA: An ecological virtual reality test with distractors for evaluating attention in children and adolescents. Virtual Reality, 5, 1–20.Google Scholar
Epstein, J. N., Erkanli, A., Conners, C. K., Klaric, J., Costello, J. E., & Angold, A. (2003). Relations between continuous performance test measures and ADHD behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 543–554.Google ScholarPubMed
Etchepareborda, M. C., Paiva-Barón, H., & Abad, L. (2009). Ventajas de las baterías de exploración neuropsicológica en el trastorno por déficit de atención/hiperactividad [Advantages of neuropsychological assessment batteries in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder]. Revista de Neurología, 48, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, E. M., & Magaz, A. (2000). Escala Magallanes de Atención Visual: EMAV [Magallanes Visual Attention Scale: EMAV]. Barakaldo, Spain: Grupo Albor Cohs.Google Scholar
Gordon Systems, Inc. (2009). The Gordon Diagnostic System - vigilance task. Retrieved from Gordon Systems Webpage http://www.gsiadd.com/gordondiagnosticsystem.htm Google Scholar
Greenberg, L. M., Kindschi, C. L., Dupuy, T. R., & Hughes, S. J. (2007). T.O.V.A. Test of Variables of Attention continuous performance test. Manual. Los Alamitos, CA: The TOVA Company.Google Scholar
Gualtieri, C. T., & Johnson, L. G. (2005). ADHD: Is objective diagnosis possible? Psychiatry, 2, 44–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Hale, J. B., Yim, M., Schneider, A. N., Wilcox, G., Henzel, J. N., & Dixon, S. G. (2012). Cognitive and neuropsychological assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Redefining a disruptive behavior disorder. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 687–707). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hooks, K., Milich, R., & Pugzles-Lorch, E. (1994). Sustained and selective attention in boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23(1), 69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2301_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsnell, G. (1953). The effect of unequal group variances on the F-test for homogeneity of group means. Biometrika, 40(1), 128–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/40.1-2.128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, C., & Mah, J. W. T. (2008). Child attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In Hunsley, J. & Mash, E. J. (Eds.), A guide to assessments that work (pp. 17–40). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klenberg, L., Korkman, M., & Lahti-Nuuttila, P. (2001). Differential development of attention and executive functions in 3- to 12-year-old Finnish children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20(1), 407–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN2001_6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lix, L. M., Keselman, J. C., & Keselman, H. J. (1996). Consequences of assumption violations revisited: A quantitative review of alternatives to the one-way analysis of variance F test. Review of Educational Research, 66, 579–619. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004579 Google Scholar
Losier, B. J., McGrath, P. J., & Klein, R. M. (1996). Error patterns on the continuous performance test in non-medicated and medicated samples of children with and without ADHD: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 37, 971–987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01494.x Google ScholarPubMed
Lozano, J. H., Capote, E., & Fernández, M. P. (2015). Convergent validity of the measures of attention and impulsivity in the Trees Simple Visual Discrimination Test (DiViSA-UAM). Anales de Psicología, 31(1), 74–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.1.161371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manly, T., Anderson, V., Nimmo-Smith, I., Turner, A., Watson, P., & Robertson, I. H. (2001). The differential assessment of children’s attention: The Test of Everyday Attention for Children (TEA-Ch), normative sample and ADHD performance. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 1065–1081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGee, R. A., Clark, S. E., & Symons, D. K. (2000). Does the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test aid in ADHD diagnosis? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 415–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullane, J. C., & Klein, R. M. (2008). Literature review: Visual search by children with and without ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12(1), 44–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1087054707305116 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naglieri, J. A., Goldstein, S., Iseman, J. S., & Schwebach, A. (2003). Performance of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and anxiety/depression on the WISC-III and Cognitive Assessment System (CAS). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21, 32–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/073428290302100103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oades, R. D. (2000). Differential measures of ‘sustained attention’ in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity or tic disorders: Relations to monoamine metabolism. Psychiatry Research, 93, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peelen, M. V., & Kastner, S. (2014). Attention in the real world: Toward understanding its neural basis. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18, 242–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pineda, D. A., Puerta, I. C., Aguirre, D. C., García-Barrera, M. A., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2007). The role of neuropsychologic tests in the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Pediatric Neurology, 36, 373–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2007.02.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proyer, R. T., & Häusler, J. (2007). Assessing behavior in standardized settings: The role of objective personality tests. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 537–554.Google Scholar
Rapport, L. J. & Weyandt, L. L. (2008). Desarrollo y medición de la inteligencia. In Sattler, J. (Ed.), Evaluación infantil. Fundamentos cognitivos [Child assessment. Cognitive bases] (5th Ed., Vol. 1, pp. 245–264). Mexico DF, Mexico: El Manual Moderno.Google Scholar
Reales, J. M., & Ballesteros, S. (1999). Implicit and explicit memory for visual and haptic objects: Cross-modal priming depends on structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 644–663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.644 Google Scholar
Riccio, C. A., Reynolds, C. R., Lowe, P., & Moore, J. J. (2002). The continuous performance test: A window on the neural substrate of attention? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 235–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(01)00111-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ríos-Lago, M., Periáñez, J. A., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. M. (2011). Neuropsicología de la atención [The neuropsychology of attention]. In Tirapu, J., Ríos-Lago, M., & Maestú, F. (Eds.), Manual de neuropsicología [Neuropsychology manual] (2nd Ed., pp. 149–188). Barcelona, Spain: Viguera.Google Scholar
Rubio, V. J., Santacreu, J., & Hernández, J. M. (2004). The objective assessment of personality. An alternative to self-report based assessment. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 30, 827–840.Google Scholar
Santacreu, J., Shih, P. C., & Quiroga, M. A. (2011). DiViSA. Test de Discriminación Visual Simple de Árboles. Manual [The Trees Simple Visual Discrimination Test. Manual]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones, SA.Google Scholar
Santostefano, S. (1978). A biodevelopmental approach to clinical child psychology: Cognitive controls and cognitive control therapy. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sciutto, M. J., & Eisenberg, M. (2007). Evaluating the evidence for and against the over-diagnosis of ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 11, 106–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1087054707300094 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Servera, M., & Llabrés, J. (2004). CSAT. Tarea de Atención Sostenida en la Infancia [Children Sustained Attention Task]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones, SA.Google Scholar
StatSoft, Inc. (2013). Electronic statistics textbook. Retrieved from http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/ Google Scholar
Stins, J. F., Tollenaar, M. S., Slaats-Villemse, D. I. E., Biutelaar, J. K., Swaab-Barneveld, H., Verhulst, F. C., … Boomsma, D. I. (2005). Sustained attention and executive functioning performance in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Child Neuropsychology, 11, 285–294. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/09297040490916938 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests (3rd Ed., pp. 546–677). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swaab-Barneveld, H., de Sonneville, L., Cohen-Kettennis, P., Gielen, A., Biutelaar, J., & van Engeland, H. (2000). Visual sustained attention in a child psychiatric population. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 651–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L., & Yela, M. (2009). Test de Percepción de Diferencias, Caras [Differences Perception Test, Faces]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones S.A.U. (Original work published 1985) Google Scholar
Toulouse, E., & Piéron, H. (1992). Prueba perceptiva y de atención. Manual [Test of perception and attention. Manual]. Madrid, Spain: Tea Ediciones, SA.Google Scholar
Wassenberg, R., Hendriksen, J. G. M, Hurks, P. P. M, Feron, F. J. M, Keulers, E. H. H., Vles, J. S. H., & Jolles, J. (2008). Development of inattention, impulsivity, and processing speed as measured by the d2 Test: Results of a large cross-sectional study in children aged 7–13. Child Neuropsychology, 14, 195–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09297040601187940 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilding, J., Munir, F., & Cornish, K. (2001). The nature of attentional differences between groups of children differentiated by teacher ratings of attention and hyperactivity. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 357–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712601162239 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilding, J., Pankhania, P. Y., & Williams, A. (2007). Effects of speed and accuracy instructions on performance in a visual search task by children with good or poor attention. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 127–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712606X109666 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfe, J. M., Kluender, K. R., Levi, D. M., Bartoshuk, L. M., Herz, R. S., Kñatzky, R. L., … Merfeld, D. M. (2012). Sensation and perception (3rd Ed., pp. 187–218). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Woods, A. J., Göksun, T., Chatterjee, A., Zelonis, S., Mehta, A., & Smith, S. E. (2013). The development of organized visual search. Acta Psychologica, 143, 191–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed