Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:52:08.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of a Questionnaire to Evaluate Coping Strategies for Skin Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Estefanía Hernández-Fernaud ,
Bernardo Hernández ,
Cristina Ruiz  and
Antonia Ruiz
Estefanía Hernández-Fernaud*
Affiliation:
Universidad de La Laguna (Spain)
Bernardo Hernández
Affiliation:
Universidad de La Laguna (Spain)
Cristina Ruiz
Affiliation:
Universidad de La Laguna (Spain)
Antonia Ruiz
Affiliation:
Consultorio Médico Tenerife Salud, Santa Cruz de Tenerife (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Estefanía Hernández-Fernaud. Departamento de Psicología Cognitiva, Social y Organizacional, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de La Laguna, Campus de Guajara, 38205, La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this work was to develop an instrument (Coping Strategies for Skin Problems Questionnaire) suitable for identifying the coping strategies people use for general skin problems. We analyzed its psychometric properties when applied to a sample of 299 individuals. Factor analysis shows a 6-factor structure referring to the wish to change, problem-solving strategies, the search for information and asking for social support, the ability to distance oneself from the problem and to see the positive aspects of the situation. These factors explain 60.77% of the variance and show an internal consistency higher than 0.67. We analyse the validity of the questionnaire and identify different coping profiles depending on the degree of skin damage as assessed by the participants and their search for health services. According to the psychometric properties obtained, we conclude that our instrument is valid and reliable for use with people presenting skin problems.

El objetivo de este trabajo es desarrollar un instrumento (Cuestionario de Estrategias de Afrontamiento ante problemas de la piel) para identificar las estrategias de afrontamiento que se utilizan frente a problemas dermatológicos. Se analiza sus propiedades psicométricas, aplicado a una muestra de 299 personas. El análisis factorial mostró una estructura en seis factores que hacen referencia a deseos de cambio, estrategias de solución del problema, búsqueda de apoyo social y de información, capacidad de distanciarse y de considerar los aspectos positivos de la situación. Estos factores explican el 60.77% de la varianza y muestran consistencias internas superiores a 0.67. Se analiza la validez del cuestionario, obteniendo perfiles de afrontamiento distintos en función del daño en la piel valorado por los participantes y la realización de consultas profesionales. Las propiedades psicométricas obtenidas permiten concluir que el instrumento evaluado es válido y fiable para personas que presentan alteraciones en la piel.

Keywords

coping strategiesquestionnaireskin problemsvalidityestrategias de afrontamientocuestionarioproblemas dermatológicosvalidez
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , May 2009 , pp. 373 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Badía, X., Mascaró, J.M. & Lozano, R. (1999). Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with mild to moderate eczema and psoriasis: clinical validity, reliability and sensitivity to change of the DLQI. British Journal of Dermatology, 141, 4, 698–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, D. (1964). The repression-sensitization as a dimension of personality. In Maher, B.A. (ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (pp 169–220), Vol. I. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Comrey, A.L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Drake, L.A., Patrick, D.L., Fleckman, P., André, J., Baran, R., Haneke, E., Sapede, C. & Tosti, A. (1999). The impact of onychomycosis on quality of life: Development of an international onychomycosis –specific questionnaire to measure patient quality of life. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 41, 2, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, S., Fleischer, A.B., Reboussin, D.M., Rapp, S., Exum, M.L., Clark, A.R. & Nurre, L. (1996). The self-administered psoriasis area and severity index is valid and reliable. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 106, 1, 183–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finzi, A., Colombo, C., Caputo, A., Andreassi, L., Chimenti, S., Vena, G., Simoni, L., Sgarbi, S. & Giannetti, A. (2007). Psychological distress and coping strategies in patients with psoriasis: the PSYCHAE Study. JEADV, 21, 1161–1169.Google ScholarPubMed
Fleishman, J.A. & Fogel, B. (1994). Coping and depressive symptoms among people with AIDS. Health Psychology, 13, 156–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folkman, S. (1982). An approach to the measurement of coping. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 3, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R.S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1, 150–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortune, D.G., Richards, H.L., Griffih, E.M. & Main, C.J. (2002). Psychological stress, distress and disability in patients with psoriasis: Consensus and variation in the contribution of illness perceptions, coping and alexithymia. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 2, 157–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohlmann, C.W. (1993). Development of repression-sensitization construct: with special reference to the discrepancy between subjective and physiological stress reactions. In Hentschel, H., Smith, G., Ehlers, W. & Draguns, J.G. (eds.), The concept of defense mechanisms in contemporary psychology (pp 184–204). New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozora, E., Ellison, M.C., Waxmonsky, J.A., Wamboldt, F.S. & Patterson, T.L. (2005). Major life stress, coping styles, and social support in relation to psychological distress in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus, 14, 363–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazarus, R.S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: a history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, R.S. & Folkman, S. (1986). Estrés y procesos cognitivos. Barcelona: Martínez Roca. (Original version: 1984).Google Scholar
Löffler, H., Dickel, H., Kus, O., Diepgen, T.L. & Effendy, I. (2001). Characteristics of self-estimated enhanced skin susceptibility. Acta Dermato Venereology, 81, 343–346.Google ScholarPubMed
Mazzotti, E., Picardi, A., Sampogna, F., Sera, F., Pasquín, P. & Abeni, D. (2003). Sensitivity of the Dermatology Life Quality Index to clinical change in patients with psoriasis. British Journal of Dermatology, 149, 318–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mearns, J. & Cain, J.E. (2003). Relationships between teachers' occupational stress and their burnout and distress: roles of coping and negative mood regulation expectancies. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 16, 1, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. & Cronan, T. (1998). The effects of coping style and self-efficacy on health status and health care costs. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 11, 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemeier, V., Kupfer, J., Demmelbauer-Ebner, M., Stangier, U., Effendy, I. & Gieler, U. (1998). Coping with acne vulgaris. Dermatology, 196, 108–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ojeda, B., Ramal, J., Calvo, F. & Vallespín, R. (2001). Estrategias de afrontamiento al estrés y apoyo social. Psiquis, 22, 3, 49–62.Google Scholar
Park, C.L., Armeli, S. & Tennen, H. (2004). Appraisal-Coping goodness of fit: A daily internet study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 558–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penley, J.A., Tomaka, J. & Wieve, J. (2002). The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 6, 551–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rapp, S.R., Cottrell, C.A. & Leary, M.R. (2001). Social coping strategies associated with quality of life decrements among psoriasis patients. British Journal of Dermatology, 145, 610–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodríguez Marín, J., Pastor, A. & López-Roig, S. (1993). Afrontamiento, apoyo social, calidad de vida y enfermedad. Psicothema, 5, Suplemento, 349–372.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Marín, J., Terol, M.C., López-Roig, S. & Pastor, M.A. (1992). Evaluación del afrontamiento del estrés: Propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario de formas de afrontamiento de acontecimientos estresantes. Revista de Psicología de la Salud, 4, 2, 59–84.Google Scholar
Roussi, P. & Vassilaki, E. (2001). The applicability of the multiaxial model of coping to a Greek population. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 14, 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, D. W. (2002). In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 12, 1629–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharloo, M., Kaptein, A.A., Weinman, J., Bergman, W., Vermeer, B.J. & Rooijmans, H.G. (2000). Patients' illness perceptions and coping as predictors of functional status in psoriasis: a 1-year follow-up. British Journal of Dermatology, 142, 899–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, S., Fischer, T.W., Chren, M.M., Strauss, B.M. & Pelsner, P. (2001). Strategies of coping and quality of life in women with alopecia. British Journal of Dermatology, 144, 1038–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid-Ott, G., Künsebeck, H-W.Jäger, B., Sittig, U., Hofste, N., Ott, R., Malewski, P. & Lamprecht, F. (2005). Significance of the Stigmatization Experience of Psoriasis Patients: A 1-Year Follow-up of the Illness and its Psychosocial Consequences in Men and Women. Acta Derm Venereol, 85, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (Second edition). New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
Vitaliano, P.P., Russo, J., Carr, J.E., Maiuro, R.D. & Becker, J. (1985). The ways of coping checklist: Revision and psychometric properties. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahl, A., Hanestad, B.R., Wiklund, I. & Moum, T. (1999). Coping and quality of life in patients with psoriasis. Quality of Life Research, 8, 5, 427–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeung, C.K., Teo, L.H.Y., Xiang, L.H. & Chan, H.H.L. (2002). A community-based epidemiological study of acné vulgaris in Hong Kong adolescents. Acta Dermato Venereology, 82, 104–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeller, R.A. & Carmines, E.G. (1980). Measurement in the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar