Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:44:27.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Construction and Validation of a Self-Efficacy Scale for Latex Barrier Use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2016

Vicente Morell-Mengual Open the ORCID record for Vicente Morell-Mengual [Opens in a new window] ,
María Dolores Gil-Llario  and
Jesús Castro-Calvo
Vicente Morell-Mengual*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia (Spain)
María Dolores Gil-Llario
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia (Spain)
Jesús Castro-Calvo
Affiliation:
Universitat Jaume I de Castellón (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Vicente Morell-Mengual. Universidad de Valencia. Dpto. de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación. Valencia (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some studies have concluded there is a relationship between perceived self-efficacy and behaviors that prevent HIV transmission. This paper presents the construction and validation of the latex barrier use self-efficacy scale (LBSS), which 480 participants filled out. Exploratory factor analysis yielded two components: positive expectations of self-efficacy (ES-POS) and negative expectations of self-efficacy (ES-NEG), which together accounted for 65.59% of total variance. That structure was later verified through confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was .80 for the total scale, and .78 for each of the two factors. Moreover, the instrument had adequate convergent validity and was positively related with condom use self-efficacy, attitudes toward condom and latex barrier use, and ability to refuse sex if the partner refuses to use preventive methods. In conclusion, this instrument is a useful measure of self-efficacy in latex barrier use.

Keywords

self-efficacylatex barrierreliabilityvalidity
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 19 , 2016 , E13
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baele, J., Dusseldorp, E., & Maes, S. (2001). Condom use self-efficacy: Effect on intended and actual condom use in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 28, 421–431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(00)00215-9 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, J. V., Farquhar, C., Owen, C., & Mangtani, P. (2004). Sexually transmitted infections in women who have sex with women. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 80, 244–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.2003.007641 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballester, R., Gil, M. D., & Giménez, C. (2007, June). El Cuestionario de Prevención del Sida (CPS): Análisis de la fiabilidad y validez [The AIDS Prevention Questionnaire (APQ): Reliability and validity analysis]. Poster session presented at the 10th National AIDS Congress, San Sebastián, Spain.Google Scholar
Ballester, R., Gil, M. D., Giménez, C., & Ruiz, E. (2009). Actitudes y conductas sexuales de riesgo para la infección por VIH/sida en jóvenes españoles [Risky sexual attitudes and behaviors related to HIV/AIDS infection among Spanish youths]. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 14, 181–191.Google Scholar
Ballester, R., Gil-Llario, M. D., Ruiz-Palomino, E., & Giménez-García, C. (2013). Autoeficacia en la prevención sexual del sida: La influencia del género [Self-efficacy in AIDS sexual prevention: Influence of gender]. Anales de Psicología, 29(1), 76–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.1.124601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory and exercise of control over HIV infection. In DiClemente, R. J. & Peterson, J. L. (Eds.), Preventing AIDS: Theories and methods of behavioral intervention (pp. 25–54). New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brafford, L. J., & Beck, K. H. (1991). Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. Journal of American College Health, 39, 219–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07448481.1991.9936238 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, M. J., & Dillon, F. R. (2005). AIDS health locus of control, self-efficacy for safer sexual practices and future time orientation as predictors of condom use in African American college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 31, 172–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095798404268288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centro Nacional de Epidemiología (2011). Situación de la infección por VIH en hombres que tienen relaciones con hombres [Situation of HIV infection in men who have sex with men]. Retrieved from Ministerio de Sanidad Política Social e Igualdad Webpage http://www.msssi.gob.es/ciudadanos/enfLesiones/enfTransmisibles/sida/vigilancia/SituacionEpidemiologicaVIHHSH.pdf Google Scholar
Centro Nacional de Epidemiología (2014). Vigilancia epidemiológica del VIH/Sida en España [Epidemiological surveillance of HIV/AIDS in Spain]. Retrieved from Ministerio de Sanidad Política Social e Igualdad Webpage http://www.msssi.gob.es/ciudadanos/enfLesiones/enfTransmisibles/sida/vigilancia/InformeVIHSida_Junio2014.pdf Google Scholar
Davis, K. C., Masters, N. T., Eakins, D., Danube, C. L., George, W. H., Norris, J., & Heiman, J. R. (2014). Alcohol intoxication and condom use self-efficacy effects on women’s condom use intentions. Addictive Behaviors, 39(1), 153–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.019 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espada Sánchez, J. P., Quiles Sebastián, M. J., & Méndez Carrillo, F. J. (2003). Conductas sexuales de riesgo y prevención del SIDA en la adolescencia [Sexual risk behaviors and AIDS prevention during adolescence]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 85, 29–36.Google Scholar
Folch, C., Ferrer, L., Casabona, J., Fernández-Dávila, P., Soriano, R., & Díez, M. (2013). Encuesta on-line europea para hombres que tienen relaciones sexuales con hombres (EMIS). Resultados en España [European online survey for men who have sex with men. Results in Spain] . Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad.Google Scholar
Hernández Cortina, A., & López Rebolledo, M. (2011). Adaptación transcultural de la escala para medir autoeficacia en el uso del condón masculino [Cross-cultural adaptation of the condom use self-efficacy scale]. Index de Enfermería, 20, 194–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1132-12962011000200012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, R. B. (1988). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mashegoane, S., Moalusi, K., Ngoepe, M., & Peltzer, K. (2004). The prediction of condom use intention among South African university students. Psychological Reports, 95, 407–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/PR0.95.6.407-417 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morokoff, P. J., Quina, K., Harlow, L. L., Whitmire, L., Grimley, D. M., Gibson, P. R., & Burkholder, G. J. (1997). Sexual assertiveness scale (SAS) for women: Development and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 790–804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.73.4.790 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muñoz-Silva, A., Sánchez-García, M., Martins, A., & Nunes, C. (2009). Gender differences in HIV-related sexual behavior among college students from Spain and Portugal. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 485–495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600001864 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richters, J., Prestage, G., Schneider, K., & Clayton, S. (2010). Do women use dental dams? Safer sex practices of lesbians and other women who have sex with women. Sexual Health, 7, 165–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SH09072 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sierra, J. C., Vallejo-Medina, P., & Santos-Iglesias, P. (2011). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la Sexual Assertiveness Scale (SAS) [Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Sexual Assertiveness Scale (SAS)]. Anales de Psicología, 27(1), 17–26.Google Scholar
Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th Ed.) (pp. 653–771). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar