Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:11:50.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Neuroticism in the Maintenance of Chronic Baseline Stress Perception and Negative Affect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2016

Irum Saeed Abbasi
Irum Saeed Abbasi*
Affiliation:
San Jose State University, California(USA)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Irum Saeed Abbasi. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of neuroticism on stress perception and its associated negative affect is explored in a quasi-experimental repeated measure study. The study involves manipulating the stress perception and affect of high N group (n = 24) and low N group (n = 28) three times; first, through exposure to neutral stimuli; second, through exposure to a laboratory stressor; third, through exposure to positive stimuli. The results reveal that after exposure to neutral stimuli, there is a significant difference in the baseline Perceived Stress Scores (PSS) (p = .005) and Negative Affect (NA) scores (p = .001) of the two groups. During the stress task, however, both groups show a non-significant difference in the PSS (p = .200) and NA scores (p = .367). After exposure to positive stimuli, there is a significant difference in the PSS scores (p = .001), but a non-significant difference in the NA scores (p = .661) of the two groups. When compared across three conditions, the high N group report significantly higher perceived stress (p = .002), but not significantly higher negative affect (p = .123) than the low N group. Finally for both PSS and NA scores, there is no interaction between neuroticism and any of the three treatment conditions (p = .176; p = .338, respectively). This study shows that the high N group may be at risk for health disparities due to maintaining a chronic higher baseline stress perception and negative affect state under neutral conditions, than the low N group. Implications of the study are discussed.

Keywords

anxietycopingmental healthpersonalitystress appraisal
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 19 , 2016 , E9
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolger, N., & Schilling, E. A. (1991). Personality and the problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. Journal of Personality, 59, 355–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00253.x Google Scholar
Bolger, N., & Zuckerman, A. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 890–902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.890 Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Sabatinelli, D., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation II: Sex differences in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 300–319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.300 Google Scholar
Childs, E., Vicini, L. M., & De Wit, H. (2006). Responses to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) in single versus grouped participants. Psychophysiology, 43, 366–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00414.x Google Scholar
Claxton, A., O’Rourke, N., Smith, J. Z., & DeLongis, A. (2012). Personality traits and marital satisfaction within enduring relationships: An intra-couple discrepancy approach. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 29, 375–396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407511431183 Google Scholar
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2136404 Google Scholar
Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. The Social Psychology of Health (pp. 31–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.668 Google Scholar
Dedovic, K., D’Aguiar, C., & Pruessner, J. (2009). What stress does to your brain: A review of neuroimaging studies. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54(1), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Thomas Google Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 Google Scholar
Gunthert, K. C., Cohen, L. H., & Armeli, S. (1999). The role of neuroticism in daily stress and coping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1087–1100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1087 Google Scholar
Hanson, E. K. S., Maas, C. J. M., Meijman, T. F., & Godaert, G. L. R. (2000). Cortisol secretion throughout the day, perceptions of the work environment, and negative affect. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 316–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02895668 Google Scholar
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.Google Scholar
John, O., Naumann, L., & Soto, C. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In John, O., Robins, R., & Pervin, L.. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N., (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3 Google Scholar
Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. , -M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The “Trier Social Stress Test”: A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28, 76–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000119004 Google Scholar
Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50, 372–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.372 Google Scholar
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.44.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1990). Controlling neuroticism in the measurement of stress. Stress Medicine, 6, 237–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smi.2460060309 Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P.. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 139–153). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Mendonça-De-Souza, A. C. F., Souza, G. G. L., Vieira, A., Fischer, N. L., Souza, W. F., Rumjanek, V. M., ... Volchan, E. (2007). Negative affect as a predisposing factor for cortisol release after an acute stress—the impact of unpleasant priming. Stress: The International Journal on the Biology of Stress, 10, 362–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10253890701379999 Google Scholar
Mooradian, T., & Olver, J. (1994). Neuroticism, affect and post purchase processes. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 595–600.Google Scholar
Nejtek, V. A. (2002). High and low emotion events influence emotional stress perceptions and are associated with salivary cortisol response changes in a consecutive stress paradigm. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 27, 337–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(01)00055-5 Google Scholar
Newman, M. G., & Llera, S. J. (2011). A novel theory of experiential avoidance in generalized anxiety disorder: A review and synthesis of research supporting a contrast avoidance model of worry. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 371–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.01.008 Google Scholar
Ormel, J., & Wohlfarth, T. (1991). How neuroticism, long-term difficulties, and life situation change influence psychological distress: A longitudinal model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 744–755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.744 Google Scholar
Penley, J. A., & Tomaka, J. (2002). Associations among the big five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Personality & Individual Differences, 32, 1215–1228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00087-3 Google Scholar
Schneider, T. R. (2004). The role of neuroticism on psychological and physiological stress responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 795–804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.005 Google Scholar
Schneider, T. R., Rench, T. A., Lyons, J. B., & Riffle, R. R. (2012). The influence of neuroticism, extraversion and openness on stress responses. Stress & Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 28, 102–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smi.1409 Google Scholar
Schwebel, D. C., & Suls, J. (1999). Cardiovascular reactivity and neuroticism: Results from a laboratory and controlled ambulatory stress protocol. Journal of Personality, 67(1), 67–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00048 Google Scholar
Smyth, J., Ockenfels, M. C., Porter, L., Kirschbaum, C., Hellhammer, D. H., & Stone, A. A. (1998). Stressors and mood measured on a momentary basis are associated with salivary cortisol secretion. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 353–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(98)00008-0 Google Scholar
Vollrath, M. (2001). Personality and stress. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 335–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00245 Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063 Google Scholar
Zobel, A., Barkow, K., Schulze-Rauschenbach, S., von Widdern, O., Metten, M., Pfeiffer, U., & Maier, W. (2004). High neuroticism and depressive temperament are associated with dysfunctional regulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical system in healthy volunteers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 109, 392–399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00313.x Google Scholar