Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-fcbfl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-05T22:54:36.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Personal Factors Underlying Resilience in Adolescence: Cross-Cultural Validity of the Prince-Embury Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2017

Mercedes Villasana ,
Jesús Alonso-Tapia  and
Miguel A. Ruiz
Mercedes Villasana
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
Jesús Alonso-Tapia*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
Miguel A. Ruiz
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jesús Alonso-Tapia. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. c/ Ivan Pavlov, 6. 28049. Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Resiliency personality factors are supposed to underlie resilience. To get evidence on this supposition, the Prince-Embury scales (PES) for adolescents were adapted to the Spanish population. Then, the relationship between the resiliency variables sense of mastery, sense of relatedness and emotional reactivity -assessed with the PES- with resilience -assessed with the Subjective Resilience Questionnaire (SRQ)- were analyzed, as well as the role of social integration within this relationship. Data from 1083 adolescents were analyzed using confirmatory techniques (CFA, PALV). CFA of PES displayed a good fit to the model (CFI: .95). Path-analysis showed that sense of mastery and emotional reactivity predict resilience as expected, but also that, contrary to expectations based on Prince-Embury’s theory, sense of relatedness and resilience are not related, either directly, or through social integration. Being related and socially integrated probably favors well-being, but it may not favor resilience unless associated to Sense of Mastery, at least in adolescence.

Keywords

resiliencyresilienceresiliency assessmentsocial integration
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 20 , 2017 , E42
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work was carried out with funding from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Project EDU2012–37382).

How to cite this article:

Villasana, M., Alonso-Tapia, J. & Ruiz, M. A. (2017). Personal factors underlying resilience in adolescence: Cross-cultural validity of the Prince-Embury Model. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20. eXX. Doi:10.1017/sjp.2017.39

References

Alonso-Tapia, J., Nieto, C., & Ruiz, M. A. (2013). Measuring subjective resilience despite adversity due to family, peers and teachers. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.33 Google Scholar
Alonso-Tapia, J., & Rodríguez-Rey, (2012). Situaciones de interacción y metas sociales en la adolescencia: Desarrollo y validación del Cuestionario de Metas Sociales (CMS). [Interaction situations and social goals in adolescence: Development and initial validation of the Social Goal Questionnaire (SGQ)]. Estudios de Psicología, 33, 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Tapia, J., Rodríguez-Rey, R., Hernansaiz-Garrido, H., Ruiz, M. A., & Nieto, C. (2017). Personality factors underlying resilience: Development and validation of the Resiliency Questionnaire for Adults (RQA) . International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 19, 104–117. http://doi.org/10.1080/14623730.2017.1297248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Tapia, J., & Villasana, M. (2014). Assessment of subjective resilience: Cross-cultural validity and educational implications. Infancia y Aprendizaje. Journal for the Study of Education and Development. 37, 629–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2014.965462.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
Baruth, K. E., & Caroll, J. J. (2002). A formal assessment of resilience: The Baruth Protective Factors Inventory. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 58(3), 235–244.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Tucker, D. (1994). Development and self-regulatory structures of the mind. Development and Psychopathology, 6, 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400004673 Google Scholar
Constantine, N. A., Benard, B., & Diaz, M. (1999). Measuring protective factors and resilience traits in youth: The healthy kids resilience assessment. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research. New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. J. (2000). Affective style, psychopathology and resilience: Brain mechanisms and plasticity. American Psychologist, 55, 1196–1214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1196 Google Scholar
Gulay, H. (2011). Assessment of the prosocial behaviors of young children with regard to social development, social skills, parental acceptance-rejection and peer relationships. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 38, 164–172.Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hanson, T. L., & Kim, J. (2007). Measuring resilience and youth development: The psychometric properties of the Healthy Kids Survey. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
Leipold, B., & Greve, W. (2015). Resilience: A conceptual bridge between coping and development. European Psychologist, 14(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.40 Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In Cicchetti, D. & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Development Psychopathology: Risk, disorder and adaptation (2 nd Ed., pp. 739–795). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519 Google Scholar
Marusak, H. A., Martin, K. R., Etkin, A., & Thomason, M. E. (2015). Childhood trauma exposure disrupts the automatic regulation of emotional processing. Neuropsychopharmacology, 40, 1250–1258. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2014.311 Google Scholar
Masten, A. S. (1994). Resilience in individual development: Successful adaptation despite risk and adversity. In Wang, M. C. & Gordon, E. W. (Eds.), Educational resilience in inner-city America: Challenges and prospects (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S., & Narayan, A. J. (2012). Child development in the context of disaster, war, and terrorism: Pathways of risk and resilience. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 227–257. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100356 Google Scholar
Milioni, M., Alessandri, G., Eisenberg, N., Castellani, V., Zufiannò, A., Vecchione, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2015). Reciprocal relations between emotional self-efficacy beliefs and ego-resiliency across time. Journal of Personality, 83, 552–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12131 Google Scholar
Olsson, C. A., Bond, L., Burns, J. M., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Sawyer, S. M. (2003). Adolescent resilience: A concept analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 26(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00118-5 Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F., & Welsh, M. (1995). Neuropsychology and developmental psychopathology. In Cicchetti, & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Manual for developmental psychopathology (Vol. 1, pp. 254–290). New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Prince-Embury, S. (2007). Resiliency scales manual: For children & adolescents: A profile of personal strengths. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, Incorporated.Google Scholar
Prince-Embury, S., & Saklofske, D. H. (2013, Eds.). Resilience in children, adolescent and adults: Translating research into practice. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince-Embury, S., & Saklofske, D. H. (2014). Resilience interventions for youth in diverse populations. New York, NY Springer.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Rey, R., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Hernansaiz-Garrido, H. (2016). Reliability and Validity of the Spanish Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Psychological Assessment, 28, e101–e110. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000191 Google Scholar
Rodríguez, M. N., & Ruiz, M. A. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: Incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicológica, 29, 205–227.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Temperament. In Damon, W. & Eisenberg, N. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional and personality development (5 th Ed., pp. 105–176). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (2013). Annual research review: Resilience - clinical implications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02615.x Google Scholar
Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972 Google Scholar
Villasana, M., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Ruiz, M. (2016). A model for assessing coping and its relation to resilience in adolescence from the perspective of “person-situation interaction”. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.053 Google Scholar
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed