Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:17:08.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motivational Profiles and Achievement Goal Dominance in PhysicalEducation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2014

Antonio Méndez-Giménez ,
José-Antonio Cecchini-Estrada  and
Javier Fernández-Río
Antonio Méndez-Giménez*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
José-Antonio Cecchini-Estrada
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
Javier Fernández-Río
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this articleshould be addressed to Antonio Méndez-Giménez. Universidadde Oviedo. Facultad de Formación del Profesorado yEducación. C/ Aniceto Sela, s/n (219). Oviedo (Spain). 33005. Phone:+34–985102850. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main goal was to compare idiographic profiles of achievement goal dominance(AGD) and motivational profiles based on 2x2 achievement goals to improve ourunderstanding of how the four achievement goals work in conjunction with oneanother, and to discern which profiles are most adaptive in the PhysicalEducation context. A total of 351 students (203 males; 148 females)(M = 14.26 ± 1.37 years) from 3 differentsecondary schools agreed to participate. 86.6% (N =303) showed AGD, mostly mastery-approach dominance (62.9%).We examined the fourAGD groups’ idiographic profiles and how they relate to certainpositive (autonomous motivation and positive affect) and negative variables(controlled motivation and amotivation). The results supported the hypotheses ofAGD theory (MANOVA one-way, Wilks’ lambda= .609, F(24, 298) = 7.96,p < .001, η2 = .15).Subsequently, k-means cluster analysis was performed, yielding4 distinct achievement goal profiles. The most adaptive was named“mastery goals”, while “high achievementgoals” were the second most adaptive. AGDparticipants’distribution across the different motivational clusterswas also ascertained (MANOVA one-way, Wilks’ lambda= .678, F(12, 910) = 12.01,p < .001, η2 =.12).

Keywords

goal orientationapproach-avoidanceself-determinationphysical education
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 17 , 2014 , E36
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Cecchini, J. A., Echevarría, L. M., & Méndez-Giménez, A. (2003). Intensidad de la motivación hacia el deporte en la edad escolar [Intensity of athletic motivation in school-age children] . Oviedo, Spain: Universidad de Oviedo. Vicerrectorado de Extensión Universitaria.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garn, A. C., & Sun, H. (2009). Approach-avoidance motivational profiles in early adolescents to the PACER fitness test. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 28, 400–421.Google Scholar
Goudas, M., Biddle, S. J. H., & Fox, K. R. (1994). Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations, and perceived competence in school physical education classes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 453–463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01116.x Google Scholar
Guan, J., Xiang, P., McBride, R., & Bruene, A. (2006). Achievement goals, social goals, and students’ reported persistence and effort in high school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.638 Google Scholar
Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.197 Google Scholar
Méndez-Giménez, A., Fernández-Río, J., & Cecchini, J. A. (in press). Dominant achievement goals and different profiles in the physical education context. Estudios de Psicología.Google Scholar
Méndez-Giménez, A., Fernández-Río, J., Cecchini, J. A., & González, C. (2013). Motivational profiles and their outcomes in physical education. A complementary study on 2x2 achievement goals and self-determination. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 22, 29–38.Google Scholar
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approachgoals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at whatcost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.77 Google Scholar
Moreno, J. A., González-Cutre, D., & Chillón, M. (2009). Preliminary validation in Spanish of a scale designed to measure motivation in physical education classes: The Perceived Locus of Causality (PLOC) Scale. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 327–337.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. A., González-Cutre, D., & Sicilia, A. (2008). Metas de logro 2x2 en estudiantes españoles de Educación Física [2x2 achievement goals in Spanish Physical Education students]. Revista de Educación, 347, 299–317.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. A., Hellín, P., Hellín, G., Cervelló, E., & Sicilia, A. (2008). Assessment of motivation in Spanish physical education students: Applying achievement goals and self-determination theories. The Open Education Journal, 1, 15–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874920800801010015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013383 Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Sandín, B. (2003). The PANAS scales of positive and negative affect for children and adolescents (PANASN). Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 8, 173–182.Google Scholar
Van Yperen, N. W. (2006). A novel approach to assessing achievement goals in the context of the 2x2 framework: Identifying distinct profiles of individuals with different dominant achievement goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1432–1445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206292093 Google Scholar
Van Yperen, N. W., Hamstra, M. R. W., & van der Klauw, M. (2011). To win, or not to lose, at any cost: The impact of achievement goals on cheating. British Journal of Management, 22, S5–S15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00702.x Google Scholar
Wang, C. K. J., Biddle, S. J. H., & Elliot, A. J. (2007). The 2x2 achievement goal framework in a physical education context. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 147–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.08.012 Google Scholar
Wang, C. K. J., Lim, B. S. C., Aplin, N. G., Chia, Y. H. M., McNeill, M., & Tan, W. K. C. (2008). Students’ attitudes and perceived purposes of physical education in Singapore: Perspectives from a 2x2 achievement goal framework. European Physical Education Review, 14, 51–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356336X07085709 Google Scholar