Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:18:58.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mothering of Conduct Problem and Normal Children in Spain and the USA: Authoritarian and Permissive Asynchrony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Robert G. Wahler  and
M. Angeles Cerezo
Robert G. Wahler
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee
M. Angeles Cerezo*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to M. Angeles Cerezo, Unidad de Investigación “Agresión y Familia”, Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Blasco Ibañez, 21, 46010 Valencia (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ninety-two clinic-referred and nonclinical mother-child dyads in Spain and the USA were observed in their home settings under naturalistic conditions for a total of 477 hours. Children in the clinic-referred dyads were considered troubled because of conduct problems. The observations were aimed at assessing two forms of mother-child asynchrony, either of which was expected to differentiate clinic referred from nonclinical dyads. Authoritarian asynchrony was defined as a mother's indiscriminate use of aversive reactions to her child, whereas the permissive form entailed indiscriminate positive reactions. Results showed the American mothers to generate more permissive asynchrony, whereas the Spanish mothers were inclined in the authoritarian direction. Only authoritarian asynchrony differentiated the clinical versus nonclinical dyads in each country. Discussion was centered on the greater salience of aversive as opposed to positive maternal attention, and cultural differences between countries that might have accounted for the different parenting styles.

Se observaron a noventa y dos díadas madre-hijo clínicas y no clínicas en España y USA en el hogar durante 477 horas en total. Los niños de las díadas clínicas se consideraron desajustados por sus problemas de conducta. El objetivo era evaluar dos formas de asincronía madre-niño, que se esperaba diferenciaran las díadas clínicas de las no-clínicas. La “asincronía autoritaria” se definió como el uso materno de reacciones aversivas indiscriminadas hacia el niño, y la “asincronía permisiva” como reacciones indiscriminadas pero positivas. Los resultados mostraron que las madres americanas generaban más asincronía permisiva y las españolas más asincronía autoritaria. Solo la asincronía autoritaria diferenciaba las díadas por su status: clínico versus no clínico en ambos países. La discusión se centró en la mayor saliencia de la atención aversiva frente a la positiva y en aspectos culturales que pueden dar cuenta de los diferentes estilos parentales.

Keywords

asynchronyconduct-problem childrennaturalistic observationSOC IIIasincroníaniños con problemas conductualesobservación naturalistaSOC III
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , November 2005 , pp. 205 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bank, L., Forgatch, M.S., Patterson, G.R., & Fetrow, R.A. (1993). Parenting practices: Mediators of negative con textual factors. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monographs, 4 (1, pt. 2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1973). The development of instrumental competence through socialization. In Pick, A. (Ed.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 3–46). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1983). Rejoinder to Lewis' reinterpretation of parental firm control effects: Are authoritive families really harmonious? Psychological Bulletin, 94, 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, I., & Waters, E. (Eds.). (1985). Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50 (1–2, Serial Nr. 209).Google Scholar
Cerezo, M.A. (1988). Standardized Observation Codes: SOC. In Hersen, M. & Bellack, A. (Eds.), Dictionary of behavioral assessment techniques (pp. 442–445). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Cerezo, M.A. (1991). El entrenamiento de observadores en el SOC III [The observer training in SOC III]. In Cerezo, M.A. (Ed.), Interacciones familiares. Un sistema de evaluación observacional: SOC III. (pp. 59–95). Madrid: Mepsa. (revised and in bilingual English-Spanish version in M.A. Cerezo (Ed.), 2000.Google Scholar
Cerezo, M.A. (Ed.). (2000). Interacción familiar/Family interaction-SOC III. (CD-ROM format). Valencia: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
Cerezo, M.A., & D'Ocón, A. (1995, November). The predictability hypothesis in coercive mother-child interaction. Sequential analyses of abusive Spanish mothers. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Conference for the Advancement of the Behavior Therapy. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Cerezo, M.A., & D'Ocón, A. (1999). Sequential analyses in coercive mother-child interaction: The predictability hypothesis in abusive vs. nonabusive dyads. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerezo, M.A., & D'Ocón, A., Dolz, L., & Cantero, M.J. (1995, May). Indiscriminate response to child's prosocial behavior in the abusive mothers: Its relationship with the child's deviant behavior in the home setting. Paper presented at the 5th European Conference on Child Abuse and Neglect, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Cerezo, M. A., & Dolz, L. (2000). Análisis de datos. Medidas/Data Analysis. Measurements. In Cerezo, M. A., (Ed.), Interacción familiar/Family Interaction- SOC III. (CD-ROM format). Valencia: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
Cerezo, M.A., Keesler, T.Y., Dunn, S.E., & Wahler, R.G. (1986). Standardized observation codes, 3rd revision. SOC III. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology. University of Tennessee.Google Scholar
Cerezo, M.A., & Pons-Salvador, G. (1996). Ecosystem adversity as setting factors in mother's perception of child behavior and indiscriminate mothering. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 103–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerezo, M.A., Wahler, R.G., & Skinner, L. (1993, November). Strategies in the mothering of conduct problem and normal children: Social cultural differences between Spain and the USA. Paper presented at the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Cohen, J.A. (1960). Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Ocón, A., & Cerezo, M.A. (1995). La observación naturalista de la interacción familiar. Fiabilidad de las secuencias de eventos. Psicológica, 16, 367–384.Google Scholar
Dumas, J.E., & Wahler, R.G. (1986). Indiscriminate mothering as a contextual factor in aggressive-oppositional child behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gilmore, D.D. (1990). Manhood in the making: Cultural concepts of masculinity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gottman, J.M., & Rushe, R.H. (1993). The analysis of change: Issues, fallacies, and new ideas. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 61, 907–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iglesias de Ussel, J., & Flaquer, L. (1993). Familia y análisis sociológico: el caso de España. REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 61, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (1991). Hogares. Resultados nacionales 1991. Madrid: Publicaciones del INE.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A.E. (1987). Conduct disorders in childhood and adolescence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kopp, C.B. (1982). Antecedents of self-regulation: A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahey, B.B., Conger, R., Atkeson, B.M., & Treiber, F.A. (1984). Parenting behavior and emotional status of physically abusive mothers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 252–256.Google Scholar
Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1986). Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. In Morris, N. & Tonry, M. (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research, 1 (pp. 29–149). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lytton, H. (1990). Child effects–still unwelcome? Response to Dodge and Wahler. Developmental Psychology. 26, 705–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccoby, E.E., & Martin, J.A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In Mussen, P.H. (Series Ed.) & Hetherington, E.M. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization. Personality and social development (pp. 1–102). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Meil-Landewerlin, G. (1998). La sociología de la familia en España, 1978/1998. REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 83, 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G.R. (1976). The aggressive child: Victim and architect of a coercive system. In Mash, E.J., Hamerlynck, L.A., & Handy, L.C. (Eds.), Behavior modification and families I. Theory and research (pp. 131–158). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Patterson, G.R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Patterson, G.R. (1992). Developmental changes in antisocial behavior. In Peters, R.D., McMahon, R.J., & Quinsey, V.L. (Eds.), Aggression and violence throughout the life span (pp. 52–82). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Patterson, G.R. (2002). Etiology and treatment of child and adolescent antisocial behavior. The Behavior Analyst Today, 3, 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G.R., Reid, J.B., & Dishion, T.J. (1992). A social learning approach: Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Pons-Salvador, G., & Cerezo, M.A. (1991). Propiedades psicométricas del SOC III. In Cerezo, M.A. (Ed.), Interacciones Familiares: Un sistema de evaluación observational: SOC III (pp. 95–128). Madrid: Mepsa. (revised and in bilingual English-Spanish version in M.A. Cerezo (Ed.), 2000.Google Scholar
Select Committee on Children, Youth & Families, U.S. House of Representatives (1989). U.S. Children and their families: Current conditions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Shaw, D.S., & Bell, R.Q. (1993). Developmental theories of parental contributors to antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 21, 493–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, J., Schrepferman, L., & St. Peter, C. (1997). Origins of antisocial behavior: Negative reinforcement and affect dysregulation of behavior as socialization mechanisms in family interaction. Behavior Modification, 21, 187–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vuchinich, S., Bank, L., & Patterson, G. R. (1992). Parenting, peers, and the stability of antisocial behavior in preadolescent boys. Developmental Psychology, 28, 510–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahler, R. G. (1990). Some perceptual functions of social networks in coercive mother-child interactions. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahler, R.G., & Dumas, J.E. (1986). Maintenance factors in coercive mother-child interactions: The compliance and predictability hypotheses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahler, R.G., & Dumas, J.E. (1989). Attentional problems in dysfunctional mother-child interactions: An interbehavioral model. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 116–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahler, R.G., Williams, A.J., & Cerezo, A.M. (1990). The compliance and predictability hypotheses: Sequential and correlational analyses of coercive mother-child interactions. Behavior Assessment, 12, 391–407.Google Scholar
Westerman, M.A., & Havstad, L.F. (1982). A pattern oriented model of caretaker-child interactions, psychopathology, and control. In Nelson, K. (Ed.), Children's language (Vol. 3, pp. 204–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Winer, B.J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar