Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:06:54.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mental Associations Between Law and Competitiveness: a Cross-Cultural Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2014

Pilar Aguilar ,
Mitchell J. Callan  and
Rael J. Dawtry
Pilar Aguilar*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
Mitchell J. Callan
Affiliation:
University of Essex United Kingdom (UK)
Rael J. Dawtry
Affiliation:
University of Kent United Kingdom (UK)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Pilar Aguilar. Psychology Department. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. C/ Ivan Paulov, 6. 28049. Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research suggests that individuals from countries that adopt an adversarial legal system, such as Canada or United Kingdom, mentally associate “law” more strongly with concepts related to competition than concepts related to cooperation. We examined whether people from a country with a non-adversarial legal system show similar mental associations. Participants from Spain and the UK completed a Single-Category Implicit Association Test. Spanish participants mentally associated the law with competition less strongly than participants from the UK (the average D-score was significantly greater than zero in the predicted direction, t(189) = 8.16, p < .001; d=1.18). Exploratory analysis also suggested that this difference between the countries was stronger among participants who believed that the method of legal practice in their own country was more adversarial. Moreover, perceiving the legal system as adversarial predicted automatic associations between law and competition for UK but not for Spanish participants. These findings suggest that legal system plays a relevant role in shaping not only individuals’ actions, but their cognitive processes.

Keywords

legal systemadversarialinquisitorialImplicit Association Testcross-cultural
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 17 , 2014 , E54
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Asimow, M. (2007). Popular culture and the adversary system. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 40, 651–683.Google Scholar
Bailis, D. S., & MacCoun, R. J. (1996). Estimating liability risks with the media as your guide: A content analysis of media coverage of tort litigation. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 419–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01498978 Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, O., & Fershtam, C. (2004). Law and preferences. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 20, 331–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewh036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrey, E., Hoffman, S. G., & Nielsen, L. B. (2012). Situated justice: A contextual analysis of fairness and inequality in employment discrimination litigation. Law and Society Review, 46, 1–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00471.x Google Scholar
Callan, M. J., Kay, A. C., Olson, J. M., Brar, N., & Whitefield, N. (2010). The effects of priming legal concepts on perceived trust and competitiveness, self-interested attitudes, and competitive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 325–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.005 Google Scholar
Callan, M. J., & Kay, A. C. (2012). Associations between law, competitiveness, and the pursuit of self-interest. In Hanson, J. D. (Ed.), Ideology, Psychology, and Law (pp. 183–218). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.003.0007 Google Scholar
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (2011). Barómetro de febrero [February report] CIS Study no. 2861. Madrid, Spain. Retrieved from www.cis.es/cis/opencm/ES/1_encuestas/estudios/ver.jsp?estudio=10804 Google Scholar
Clark, M. S., Ouellette, R., Powell, M. C., & Milberg, S. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 94–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.94 Google Scholar
Cohn, E. S., & White, S. O. (1990). Legal socialization: A study of norms and rules. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3378-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewik, P., & Sibley, S., , S. (1998). The Common place of law: Stories from everyday life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, H. P. (2004). Legal traditions of the world: Sustainable diversity in law, (2 nd Ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 Google Scholar
Inquisitorial system (n.d.). In The Free Dictionary. Retrieved from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Inquisitorial+System Google Scholar
Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16 Google Scholar
Kysar, D. A. (2012). “You call, I hammer!”: Adversarial legalism and social influence. In Hanson, J. D. (Ed.). Ideology, Psychology, and Law (pp. 219–227). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.003.0008 Google Scholar
Levine, T. R., & McCornack, S. A. (1991). The dark side of trust: Conceptualizing and measuring types of communicative suspicion. Communication Quarterly, 39, 325–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463379109369809 Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Hamedani, M. G. (2007). Sociocultural psychology: The dynamic interdependence among self systems and social systems. In Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Cultural Psychology (pp. 3–39). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, L. B. (2000). Situating legal consciousness: Experiences and attitudes of ordinary citizens about law and street harassment. Law & Society Review, 34, 1055–1090. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3115131 Google Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Cunningham, W. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Measuring implicit attitudes on the Internet. Nashville, TN: Society for Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
O’Conner, S. D. (1999). Professionalism. Oregon Law Review, 78, 385–391.Google Scholar
Roberson, C., & Das, D. K. (2008). An introduction to comparative legal models of criminal justice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, A., & Kearns, T. R. (1995). Law in everyday life. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, S. S. (2005). After legal consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 323–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115938 Google Scholar
Silbey, S. S., & Cavicchi, A. (2005). The common place of law: Transforming matters of concern into the objects of everyday life. In Latour, B. & Weibel, P. (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 556–563). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NY:. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541–566. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3480099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uskul, A. K., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2008). Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 8552–8556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803874105 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. N., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733 Google Scholar