Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:31:20.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Black and White or Shades of Grey? Comparing Social Representations Centrality Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2013

Joao Wachelke
Joao Wachelke*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (Brazil)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Joao Wachelke. Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Campus Umuarama, Bloco 2C–Sl. 19. Av. Pará 1720, Uberlândia - MG (Brazil). CEP 38400-902. Phone: +55-3432182822. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study, aligned with the structural approach on social representations (SR), aimed at comparing dichotomous (central vs. peripheral) and continuous models of structural status of SR elements. The sample was formed by 114 undergraduate students who completed context independence tasks and resistance to change evaluations related to 30 elements from 3 SR objects. Non-nested regression models having resistance to change as the criterion variable and dichotomous and continuous operationalizations of symbolic value as predictors were compared. Statistical results complemented by follow-up t-tests challenge the dichotomous model and support a continuous quadratic one. The curve is interpreted as being related to different evaluations when elements are attributed to a majority or a minority and point out to the need to employ within subjects designs in future research assessing more properties with composite measures.

Keywords

social representationsstructural approachcentral core theorycalling into questionsocial thinking
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 16 , 2013 , E33
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author held a scholarship from Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo and carried out the research while he was a doctoral student at the University of Padua (Italy).
Manuscript based in research presented at the X National Congress of the Social Psychology section of the Italian Psychology Association-2010, and winner of the “Best study presented in a poster by a young researcher” award.

References

Abric, J. C. (1994a). Les représentations sociales: Aspects théoriques [Social representations: Theoretical aspects]. In Abric, J.-C. (Ed.), Pratiques sociales et representations [Social practices and representations] (pp. 11–36). Paris, France: PUF.Google Scholar
Abric, J. C. (1994b). L’organisation interne des representations sociales: Système central et système périphérique [The internal organization of social representations: Central and peripheral system]. In Guimelli, C. (Ed.), Structures et transformations des représentations sociales [Structures and transformations of social representations] (pp. 73–84). Lausanne, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Abric, J. C., & Tafani, E. (1995). Nature et fonctionnement du noyau central d’une représentation sociale: La représentation de l’entreprise [Nature and functioning of the central core of a social representation: The representation of the firm]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 28, 22–31.Google Scholar
Codol, J. P. (1969). Note terminologique sur l’emploi de quelques expressions concernant les activités et processus cognitifs en psychologie sociale [Terminological note on the use of some expressions concerning the cognitive activities and processes in social psychology]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 23, 63–71.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662168300700301 Google Scholar
Dany, L., & Apostolidis, T. (2007). Approche structurale de la représentation sociale de la drogue: Interrogations autour de la technique de mise en cause [Structural approach of the social representation of drugs: Inquiries regarding the calling into question technique]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 73, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flament, C. (1989). Structure et dynamique des représentations sociales [Social representation structure and dynamics]. In Jodelet, D. (Ed.), Les représentations sociales [Social representations] (pp. 204–219). Paris, France: PUF.Google Scholar
Flament, C. (1994a). Le plaisir et la rémuneration dans la représentation sociale du travail [Pleasure and remuneration in the social representation of work]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 23, 61–69.Google Scholar
Flament, C. (1994b). Aspects périphériques des representations sociales [Peripheral aspects of social representations]. In Guimelli, C. (Ed.), Structures et transformations des représentations sociales [Structures and transformations of social representations] (pp. 85–118). Lausanne, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Flament, C. (1999). La représentation sociale comme système normatif [The social representation as a normative system]. Psychologie & Société, 1, 29–53.Google Scholar
Flament, C., & Rouquette, M. L. (2003). Anatomie des idées ordinaires [Anatomy of ordinary ideas]. Paris, France: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Lheureux, F., Rateau, P., & Guimelli, C. (2008). Hiérarchie structurale, conditionnalité et normativité des représentations sociales [Structural hierarchy, conditionality and normativity of social representations]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 77, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo Monaco, G., Lheureux, F., & Halimi-Falkowicz, S. (2008). Test d’Indépendance au Contexte (TIC) et structure des représentations sociales. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67, 119–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.67.2.119 Google Scholar
Katerelos, I. (1993). Pratiques, conditionnalité et sous-structuration au sein des représentations sociales: une étude de la représentation de la relation éducative chez les instituteurs en ZEP [Practices, contidionality and understructuing in social representations: A study of the representation of the educational relationship in ZEP teachers]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France.Google Scholar
Katerelos, I. D. (2003). Négociabilité argumentative intra noyau: une étude exploratoire sur la structure des représentations sociales [Argumentative within-core negotiability: An exploratory study on the structure of social representations]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 60, 40–49.Google Scholar
Milland, L. (2002). Pour une approche de la dynamique du rapport entre représentations sociales du travail et du chômage [For an approach of the relationship dynamics between the social representations of work and unemployment]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 15(2), 27–55.Google Scholar
Moliner, P. (1989). Validation expérimentale de l’hypothèse du noyau central des représentations sociales [Experimental validation of the central core hypothesis of social representations]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 41, 759–762.Google Scholar
Moliner, P. (1992). Représentations sociales, schèmes conditionnels et schèmes normatifs [Social representations, conditional schemes and normative schemes]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 45, 325–329.Google Scholar
Moliner, P. (1993). ISA: l’induction par scénario ambigu. Une méthode pour l’étude des représentations sociales [IAS: the induction by ambiguous scenario. A method for the study of social representations]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 5(2), 7–21.Google Scholar
Moliner, P. (1994). Les méthodes de répérage et d’identification du noyau des représentations sociales [identification methods for the core of social representations]. In Guimelli, C. (Ed.), Structures et transformations des représentations sociales [Structures and transformations of social representations] (pp. 199–232). Lausanne, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Moliner, P. (1995). A two-dimensional model of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 27–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moliner, P. (1996). Images et représentations sociales: De la théorie des représentations à l’étude dês images sociales [Images and social representations: from representations theory to the study of social images]. Grenoble, France: PUG.Google Scholar
Moliner, P. (2001a). Une approche chronologique des représentations sociales [A chronological approach to social representations]. In Moliner, P. (Ed.), La dynamique des représentations sociales [Social representations dynamics] (pp. 245–268). Grenoble, France: PUG.Google Scholar
Moliner, P. (2001b). Consensus manifestes, consensus latents et consensus illusoires [Manifest consensus, latent consensus and illusory consensus]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 49, 114–122.Google Scholar
Moliner, P., Rateau, P., & Cohen-Scali, V. (2002). Les représentations sociales: Pratique des études de terrain [Social representations: Practice of field studies]. Rennes, France: PUR.Google Scholar
Moliner, P., & Tafani, E. (1997). Attitudes and social representations: A theoretical and experimental approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 687–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199711/12)27:6<687::AID-EJSP839>3.0.CO;2–7 Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public [Psychoanalysis, its image and audience]. Paris, France: PUF.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fejsp.2420180303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, S., & Faucheux, C. (1972). Social influence, conformity bias and the study of active minorities. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 150–202. New York, NY: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2FS0065-2601%2808%2960027-1 Google Scholar
Mugny, G., Moliner, P., & Flament, C. (1997). De la pertinence des processus d’influence sociale dans la dynamique des représentations sociales: Une étude exploratoire [Of the pertinence of social influence processes in social representation dynamics: An exploratory study]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 10, 31–49.Google Scholar
Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1993 ). Influences sociales: La théorie de l’élaboration du conflit [Social influences: Conflict elaboration theory]. Paris, France: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rateau, P. (1995). Le noyau central des représentations sociales comme système hiérarchisé. Une étude sur la représentation du groupe [The central core of social representations as a hierarhical system. A study on the representation of the group]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 26, 29–52.Google Scholar
Rouquette, M. L. (1994). Sur la connaissance des masses: Essai de psychologie politique [On the knowledge of masses: Essay of political psychology]. Paris, France: PUF.Google Scholar
Rouquette, M. L., & Rateau, P. (1998). Introduction à l’étude des représentations sociales [Introduction to the study of social representations]. Grenoble, France: PUG.Google Scholar
Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.87.2.245 Google Scholar
Tafani, E. (2001). Attitudes, engagements et dynamique des représentations sociales: Études expérimentales [Attitudes, involvement and social representation dynamics: Experimental studies]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 14, 7–29.Google Scholar
Tafani, E., & Souchet, L. (2002). Commitment to pro-versus counter-attitudinal behavior and the dynamics of social representations. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 34–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024%2F%2F1421-0185.61.1.34 Google Scholar
Vergès, P. (1994). Approche du noyau central: Propriétés quantitatives et structurales [Approach to the central core: Quantitative and structural properties]. In Guimelli, C. (Ed.), Structures et transformations des représentations sociales [Structures and transformations of social representations] (pp. 233–253). Lausanne, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Williams, E. J. (1959). The comparison of regression variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 21, 396–399.Google Scholar