Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:37:50.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Traditional dispute resolution in Micronesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Patrick M. Wolff  and
O. Randall Braman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Traditional approaches to dispute resolution in Micronesia offer elements of reconciliation that are practical and essential for maintaining peaceful relationships on a small island. These elements include family involvement, ritualistic processes, symbolism, mediation, and restitution. Using information gathered through interviews and an observation of a simulation, and by reviewing literature related to cultural differences in general, this paper introduces these elements, describes their application in real life and ceremonial events, and discusses theoretical connections with the cultural dimension of individualism and collectivism. In conclusion, the authors encourage a heightened awareness, further research, and continued practice of traditional Micronesian approaches to dispute resolution.

Type
Qualitative Research
Information
South Pacific Journal of Psychology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , 1999 , pp. 44 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea and the Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Territory University, Australia 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carl, M. (1991). Notes from a personal interview.Google Scholar
Fritz, S. (1995). Notes from a personal interview.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morisaki, S., & Gudykunst, W. B. (1994). Face in Japan and the United States. In Ting-Toomey, S. (Ed.), The challenge offacework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues (pp. 47–93). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ngiraibuuch, J. (1991). Notes from a personal interview.Google Scholar
Reynold, H. (1994). Notes from a personal interview.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. (1994). Managing conflict in intimate intercultural relationships. In Cahn, D. (Ed.), Conflict in personal relationships (pp. 47–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1994). Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of collectivism and individualism. In Kim, U., Triandis, H., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S., & Yoon, G. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism (pp. 41–51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Victus, K., Pisek, A., & Alexander, A. (1995, 08). A traditional Chuukese reconciliation ritual demonstration. Presented at the 12th Pacific Educators Conference, Belau.Google Scholar