Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:54:43.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between Chinese character frequency of occurrence and response latency: A direct prediction of the Forster's Search Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Ee-Li Hong
Ee-Li Hong*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Monash University, AUSTRALIA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes an experiment concerned with the relationship between word frequency and the speed of word recognition for Chinese. The aim is to determine whether the nature of the frequency-response time relationship that has been found to exist for English can be expected to be observed for Chinese as well. Word frequency effect is discussed in relation to the network models and the Search model of lexical access. The outcome of the experiment provides evidence in support of the Search model of lexical access.

Type
Part III. Psycholinguistics
Information
South Pacific Journal of Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Asia-Pacific Language Research , 1999 , pp. 68 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea and the Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Territory University, Australia 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, S. M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task. Memory and Cognition, 3, 549–559.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In Walker, E. C. T. & Wales, R. J. (Eds.), New Approaches to Language Mechanisms. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishers.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. (1989). Basic issues in lexical processing. In Marslen-Wilson, W. M. (Ed.), Lexical Representation and Process. Cambridge: M.I.T Press.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. (1992). Memory-addressing mechanisms and lexical access. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 411–434). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–698.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Psychology, 39A, 211–251.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Dickinson, R. G. (1976). More on the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: Monte Carlo estimates of error rates for F1, F2, F, and minF′. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, M. K., Rothkopf, E. Z., Lapan, R., & Lafferty, T. (1987). The word frequency effect in lexical decision: Finding a frequency-based component. Memory and Cognition, 15, 24–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, E. L., & Yelland, G. W. (1997). The generality of lexical neighborhood effects. In Chen, H. C. (Ed.), Cognitive Processing of Chinese and Related Asian Languages (pp. 187–203). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, J. T. (1986). Visual Integration process in recognizing Fragmented Chinese characters. In Kao, B. R. & Hoosain, R. (Eds.), Linguistics, Psychology, and the Chinese Language (pp. 45–54). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Hue, C. W. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In Chen, H. C. & Tzeng, O. J. L. (Eds.), Language Processing in Chinese (pp. 93–107). Elsevier Science Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. F. (1992). On the role of cohorts or neighbors in visual word recognition. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 147–164). Elsevier Science Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. F., Allen, P. A., & Strand, T. L. (1989). On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters. Memory and Cognition, 17, 474–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational Analysis of Present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modern Chinese frequency dictionary [Xiandai huayu pinlu zidian]. (1985). Beijing, China: Beijing Language Institute Press.Google Scholar
Santa, J. L., Miller, J. J., & Shaw, M. L. (1979). Using quasi F to prevent alpha inflation due to stimulus variation. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, D. L., Gerard, L., & Cortese, C. (1979). Accessing lexical memory: The transfer of word repetition effects across tasks and modality. Memory and Cognition, 7(1), 2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65–76.Google ScholarPubMed
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taft, M. (1979b). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taft, M., Huang, J. S., & Zhu, X. P. (1994). The influence of character frequency on word recognition responses in Chinese. Advances in the Study of Chinese Language Processing, 1, 59–73.Google Scholar
Taft, M., & Zhu, X. P. (1995). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In Feldman, L. B. (Ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing (pp. 293–316). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Zhu, X. P., & Taft, M. (1994a). Holistic or component processing? Evidence from Chinese word and character recognition. In Jing, Q., Zhang, H., & Peng, D. (Eds.), Information Processing of Chinese Language (pp. 52–69). Beijing Normal University Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Zhu, X. P., & Taft, M. (1994b). The influence of perceptual experience on Chinese character processing. Advances in the Study of Chinese Language Processing, 1, 85–99.Google Scholar