Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:34:51.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cohort analysis of illicit psychoactive drug use in Australia 1988-98

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Paul Williams  and
Ian McAllister
Paul Williams
Affiliation:
Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra ACT 2603, Australia
Ian McAllister
Affiliation:
Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: To examine birth cohort trends in the prevalence, age of initiation and durability of the use of psycho-stimulant and psycho-depressant drugs in Australia between 1988 and 1998.

Method: Nine synthetic birth cohorts were constructed from a pooled dataset of the three National Drug Strategy Household Surveys (1988, 1993, 1998). The design-effect adjusted weighted lifetime and recent prevalence, age of initiation and durability of use, of three popular psycho-stimulants (amphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy) and three popular psycho-depressants (cannabis, heroin and inhalants) were estimated. Significance tests of difference use chi-square statistics and the sociodemographic predictors of trends were tested using logistic regression techniques.

Results: Lifetime and recent prevalence and durability of use increased and ages of initiation decreased, with each successive cohort. Psycho-stimulants were predictors for psycho-depressant use and vice versa. Being male, aged under 35 years, Australian born, employed or in fulltime education, and a tobacco smoker were significant predictors of increased risk of using both classes of drugs. Being married or having no post-secondary education qualifications were significant predictors of lower risk of using either class of drugs.

Conclusions: Younger cohorts are more likely to use both classes of psychoactive drugs, to have commenced using the drugs earlier and to have maintained their drug habits longer, compared to older cohorts. While increased availability is an important factor in the likelihood of exposure to illicit drugs, interventions implemented since the National Drug Strategy began in 1985 do not appear to have reduced the probability that young people will initiate and maintain illicit psychoactive drug use, exposing them to associated health and legal consequences.

Keywords

Psycho-stimulantspsycho-depressantsillicit drug usecannabisheroininhalantsamphetaminesecstasycocainecohortAustralia
Type
Articles
Information
South Pacific Journal of Psychology , Volume 13: Special Issue: Substance Use in Northern Australia , 2001 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea and Massey University, New Zealand/Aotearoa 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (1999). 1998 National Drug Strategy Household Survey First Results. AIHW cat. No. PHE 15, Canberra Google Scholar
Brands, B., Sproule, B., & Marshman, J. (1998). Drugs and Drug Abuse (3rd edition). Addiction Research Foundation. Ontario Google Scholar
Darke, S.: Ross, J., & Kaye, S. (1996). Overdose among heroin users in Sydney Australia. 1. prevalence and correlates of non-fatal overdose. Addiction, 91: 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degenhardt, L.; Lynskey, M., & Hall, W. (2001). Cohort trends in the age of initiation of drug use in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 24 (4), 421–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Human Services and Health. (1994). NCADA Fact Sheet. AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Dewitt, D.J.; Offord, DR., & Wong, M. (1999). Patterns of onset and cessation of drug use over the early part of the life course. Health Education and Behaviour, 24: 746–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, D. B., Yamaguchi, K., & Chen, K. (1992). Stages of progression in drug involvement from adolescence to adulthood: Further evidence for the gateway theory. Journal of Studies on Alcohol; 53(5), 447–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandel, D., & Yamaguchi, K. (1993). From beer to crack: developmental patterns of drug involvement. American Journal of Public Health, 83(6), 851–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandel, D., & Faust, R. (1975). Sequence and stages in patterns of adolescent drug use. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32(7), 923–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makkai, T. (1998a). Alcohol and disorder in the Australian Community part 1 – Victims. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No 76, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra Google Scholar
Makkai, T. (1998b). Alcohol and disorder in the Australian Community Part 2-Perpetrators. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No 77, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra Google Scholar
Makkai, T., & McAllister, I. (1998). Patterns of drug use in Australia 1985-1995. Department of Health and Family Services, Canberra.Google Scholar
Makkai, T.. & McGregor, K. (2001). Drug Use Monitoring in Australia. 2000 Annual report on drug use among police detainees. Research and Public Policy Series, No 37. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. (2001). Changes in Drug use in Australia and the United States: results from the 1995 and 1998 National Household Surveys, Drug and Alcohol Review (20), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, I & Williams, P. (2001a) Does increased Tobacco use among younger women lead to more illicit drug use? Evidence from Australia. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
McAllister, I & Williams, P. (2001 b) Pathways to drug use: Marijuana and Amphetamines as gateways. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Miller, M., & Draper, G. (2001). Statistics on drug use in Australia 2000. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Drug Statistics series. AIHW cat. No. PHE 30. Canberra Google Scholar
Ministerial Council on Drug Strategy. (1998). National Drug Strategic Framework, MCDS, Canberra Google Scholar
Reid, A., Lynskey, M., & Copeland, J. (2000). Cannabis use among Australian adolescents: findings from the 1998 National Drug Strategy Household Survey. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 24(6), 596–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy Morgan Research. (1999). National Drug Strategy Household Survey Report 1998. Roy Morgan Research, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Upfal, J. (1991). The Australian Drug Guide. Bookman Press, Melbourne Google Scholar
Werch, C. E., & Anzalone, D. (1995). Stage theory and research on tobacco, alcohol, and other drug use. Journal of Drug Education, 25(2), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. (2001a). Illicit Drug Use in Regional Australia 1988-1998. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice. No.192. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra Google Scholar
Williams, P. (2001b). Alcohol, young persons and violence. Research and Public Policy Series No 35. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra Google Scholar
Williams, P. (1997). Progress of the National Drug Strategy: Key National Indicators. Department of Health and Family Services, Canberra.Google Scholar
Williams, P., Bryant, M and Hennessy, S. (2001). Australian Capital Territory Drug Trends 2000. Findings from the Illicit Drug Reporting System (IDRS) NDARC Technical Report No. 105. University of New South Wales, Sydney. Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, K., & Kandel, D.B. (1984). Patterns of drug use from adolescence to young adulthood II: Sequences of progression. American Journal of Public Health, 74(7), 668–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, J., & Williford, W.R. (1992). The age of alcohol onset and alcohol, cigarette and marijuana use patterns: an analysis of drug use progression of young adults in New York State. International Journal of Addiction. 27, (11), 1313–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed