Article contents
Voter Turnout, Critical Elections, and the New Deal Realignment*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
Extract
The purpose of this article is to add critical expansion and empirical correction to the thinking about critical elections in American history in general and the New Deal realignment in particular. There will be first a discussion of critical realignment theory, in which some of its ambiguities with regard to the relationship of voting turnout to realignment will be explored. Next, some propositions derived from this literature will be tested in an effort to correct the theory and eliminate the ambiguities. Aggregate data from presidential and congressional elections, 1912-1940, in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and the city of Pittsburgh, will be employed in this effort.
In general, it will be argued that, when fluctuations in turnout are taken into account, the electoral changes preceding 1940 are at least as correctly described by the term “mobilization” as by the term “realignment.” Finally, some observations will be offered on the future of critical election theory.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Social Science History Association 1979
Footnotes
This article would not have been possible without the constructive criticism and encouragement of Walter Dean Burnham, Roy Feldman, Martha Weinberg, and the late Jeffrey Pressman.
References
- 2
- Cited by