Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:59:23.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding State Responses to Left- versus Right-Wing Threats

The FBI’s Repression of the New Left and the Ku Klux Klan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

David Cunningham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between 1956 and 1971, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) operated five counterintelligence programs (COINTELPROs) designed to repress a range of threats to the status quo. This article examines more than twelve thousand pages of memos related to FBI programs against white hate groups (mostly the Ku Klux Klan) and the New Left in an effort to gain insight into the Bureau's repression of left- and right- wing targets. The article's goals are both general and historically specific: First, to introduce a two-dimensional typology to organize and categorize repressive acts generally and then to use this typology to examine the patterning of repressive acts across the COINTELPROs. This approach allows for the uncovering of distinct overarching strategies applied to left- versus right-wing targets. These strategies are emergent in the sense that they are not apparent from a textual analysis of Bureau memos or through a comparison of the outcomes of each COINTELPRO. Recognition of these emergent strategies provides insight into the complex, ambiguous relationship that the FBI had with both the civil rights movement and the Klan.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , Fall 2003 , pp. 327 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackstock, Nelson (1975) COINTELPRO: The FBI’s Secret War on Political Freedom. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Carley, Michael (1997) “Defining forms of successful state repression of social movement organizations: A case study of the FBI’s COINTELPRO and the American Indian Movement.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change 20: 151–76.Google Scholar
Carson, Clayborne (1981) In Struggle: SNCC and the Black Awakening of the 1960s. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David M. (1981) Hooded Americanism: The History of the Ku Klux Klan. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Churchill, Ward, and VanderWall, Jim (1988) Agents of Repression: The FBI’s Secret Wars against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
Churchill, Ward, and VanderWall, Jim (1990) The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI’s Secret War against Dissent in the United States. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
Cunningham, David (2000) “Organized repression and movement collapse in a modern democratic state.” Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Davenport, , Christian, , ed. (2000) Paths to State Repression: Human Rights Violations and Contentious Politics. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Davenport, , Christian, (2002) “Understanding covert repressive activity: The case of an American anti- Red squad.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Davis, James Kirkpatrick (1997) Assault on the Left: The FBI and the Sixties Antiwar Movement. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella, and Reiter, Herbert, eds. (1998) Policing Protest: The Control of Mass Demonstrations in Western Democracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
DeNardo, James (1985) Power in Numbers: The Political Strategy of Protest and Rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (various,1964–71). Memoranda. Obtained from Scholarly Resources, Inc., Wilmington, DE, and FBI National Headquarters Reading Room, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Francisco, Ronald A. (1995) “The relationship between coercion and protest: An empirical evaluation in three coercive states.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 39: 263–82.Google Scholar
Francisco, Ronald A. (1996) “Coercion and protest: An empirical test in two democratic states.” American Journal of Political Science 40:1179–1204.Google Scholar
Garrow, David J. (1981) The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.: From “Solo” to Memphis. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted R. (1971) Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jayko, Margaret, ed. (1988) FBI on Trial. New York: Pathfinder.Google Scholar
Keller, William W. (1989) The Liberals and Edgar J. Hoover: Rise and Fall of a Domestic Intelligence State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Khawaja, Marwan (1993) “Repression and popular collective action: Evidence from the West Bank.” Sociological Forum 8: 47–71.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud (1997) “Dynamics of repression and mobilization: The German extreme Right in the 1990’s.” Mobilization 2 (2): 149–65.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark (1987) “Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 31:266–97.Google Scholar
Marable, Manning (1991) Race, Reform, and Rebellion: The Second Reconstruction in Black America, 1945-1990. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
Marx, Gary (1988) Undercover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Aldon (1984) The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing for Change. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Muller, Edward N. (1985) “Income inequality, regime repressiveness, and political violence.” American Sociological Review 50: 47–61.Google Scholar
Muller, Edward N., and Weede, Erich (1990) “Cross-national variation in political violence: A rational action approach.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 34: 624–51.Google Scholar
Neidhardt, Friedhelm (1989) “Gewalt und gegengewalt: Steigt die bereitschaft zu gewalt-aktionen mit zunehmender staatlicher controlle und repression?” in Heitmeyer, Wilhelm, Möller, Kurt, and Sünker, Heinz (eds.) Jugend, Staat, Gewalt: Politische Sozialisation von Jugendlichen, Jugendpolitik und politische Bildung. Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter, and Roehl, Wolfgang (1990) “Repression, micromobilization, and political protest.”Social Forces 69: 521–47.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, Kenneth (1989) “Race Matters”: The FBI’s Secret File on Black America, 1960–1972. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, Kenneth (1994) Black Americans: The FBI Files. New York: Carroll & Graf.Google Scholar
Powers, Richard Gid (1987) Secrecy and Power: The Life of J. Edgar Hoover. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rasler, Karen (1996) “Concessions, repression, and political protest in the Iranian Revolution.” American Sociological Review 61 (February): 132–52.Google Scholar
Sale, Kirkpatrick (1973) SDS. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Sullivan, William C., with Brown, Bill (1979) The Bureau: My Thirty Years in Hoover’s FBI. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Theoharis, Athan (1989) “The FBI and dissent in the United States,” in Franks, C. E. S. (ed.) Dissent and the State. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ungar, Sanford J. (1975) FBI. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
United Klans of America, Inc. (UKA) (1978) Fiery Cross Magazine, no. 13. Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Un-American Activities (1966) Activities of Ku Klux Klan Organizations in the United States, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Google Scholar
Wade, Wyn Craig (1987) The Fiery Cross: The Ku Klux Klan in America. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
White, Robert W. (1989) “From peaceful protest to guerrilla war: Micromobilization of the Provisional Irish Republican Army.” American Journal of Sociology 94: 1277–1302.Google Scholar