Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:42:26.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transnational Activist Networks and the Emergence of Labor Internationalism in the NAFTA Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Abstract

Recent accounts of transnational activism have examined a variety of social movement organizations (SMOs) but have paid little attention to labor transnationalism. This article utilizes and adapts this new transnational social movements scholarship to understand contemporary labor activism in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) countries. Exploring the preexisting networks and intramovement cleavages that helped spawn labor opposition to NAFTA, it focuses on labor activists' complaints under the treaty's labor side accord. I explore how rising political opportunities associated with the treaty and its new institutions created new political arenas, targets for activists, and incentives for cross-border collaboration. The cross-border political exchanges that formed part of labor activists' strategies to utilize these new institutions helped activists create new movement frames, transnational identities, and coalitions. While these outcomes support the findings of literature on transnational SMOs, they point to the particular dilemmas labor activists faced in confronting these issues due to their vulnerability, the status of unions as formal organizations embedded in national institutional structures, and the difficulty of imagining policies and strategies that might be effective in this new transnational sphere.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaronson, Susan (2001) Taking Trade to the Streets. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Alegre, Robert (2000) “Taking control: Mexican railway workers and the strike of 1958-1959.” M.A. thesis, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Ayres, Jeffrey (1998) Defying Conventional Wisdom. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Ayres, Jeffrey (2001) “Transnational political processes and contention against the global economy.” Mobilization 6 (1): 55–68.Google Scholar
Bonacich, Edna (2000) “Intense challenges, tentative possibilities: Organizing immigrant garment workers in Los Angeles,” in Milkman, Ruth (ed.) Organizing Immigrants: The Challenge for Unions in Contemporary California. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press: 130–49.Google Scholar
Carr, Barry (1999) “Globalization from below: Labour internationalism under NAFTA.” International Social Science Journal 51 (March):49–59.Google Scholar
Coalition for Justice in the Maquiladoras (CJM) (2003) “Coalition for Justice in the Maquiladoras Mission Statement.” Available online at www.coalitionforjustice.net/pageing.swf (accessed 18 November 2003).Google Scholar
Cohen, Larry, and Early, Steve (1999) “Defending workers' rights in the global economy: The CWA experience,” in Nissen, Bruce (ed.) Which Direction for Organized Labor? Essays on Organizing, Outreach, and Internal Transformations. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Compa, Lance (1997) “NAFTA's labor side accord: A three-year accounting.” NAFTA: Law and Business Review of the Americas 3 (3): 6–23.Google Scholar
Compa, Lance (1998) “A fast track for labor.” American Prospect (September-October):60–64.Google Scholar
Cook, Maria Lorena (1995) “Mexican state-labor relations and the political implications of free trade.” Latin American Perspectives 22 (winter):77–94.Google Scholar
Dreiling, Michael (2001) Solidarity and Contention: The Politics of Security and Sustainability in the NAFTA Conflict. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Frundt, Henry J. (1996) “Trade and cross-border labor strategies in the Americas.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 17: 387–417.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Dale (2000) Allies across the Border: Mexico's “Authentic Labor Front” and Global Solidarity. Cambridge, MA: South End.Google Scholar
Herod, Andrew (1997) “Labor as an agent of globalization and as a global agent,” in Cox, Kevin (ed.) Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local. New York: Guilford: 167–200.Google Scholar
Imig, Doug, and Tarrow, Sidney (2001a) “Studying contention in an emerging polity,” in Imig, and Tarrow, (eds.)Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield:3–26.Google Scholar
Imig, Doug (2001b) “Mapping the Europeanization of contention: Evidence from quantitative data analysis,” in Imig, and Tarrow, (eds.) Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield:27–49.Google Scholar
Interhemispheric Resource Center (IRC) (1998) “BorderForum: Insights and perspectives.” Borderlines 48, September. Available on-line at www.americaspolicy.org/borderlines/1998/bl48/bl48.html (accessed 19 February 2000).Google Scholar
International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) (2002) “Yakima apple workers win new election.” Available on-line at www.teamster.org/01news/nr%5F010103%5F1.htm(accessed 19 April).Google Scholar
Johnston, Paul (1994) Success While Others Fail. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, Andrew (1998) “Investigating the local-global paradox: Corporate strategy, union local autonomy, and community action in Chicago,” in Herod, Andrew (ed.) Organizing the Landscape: Geographical Perspectives on Labor Unionism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 325–50.Google Scholar
Josselin, Daphné (2001) “Back to the front line? Trade unions in a global age,” in Josselin, and Wallace, William (eds.) Non-State Actors in World Politics. Houndmills, U.K.: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. (1995) “Social equity and environmental politics in Brazil: Lessons from the rubber tappers of Acre.” Comparative Politics (July):409–24.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Katherine (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kopinak, Kathryn (1996) Desert Capitalism. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Levenson-Estrada, Deborah (1994) Trade Unionists against Terror. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Andrew, and Ross, George (2001) “Trade union organizing at the European level: The dilemma of borrowed resources,” in Imig, Doug and Tarrow, Sidney (eds.) Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield: 53–76.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John, and Zald, Mayer, eds. (1996) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin (1995) The Paradox of Revolution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ness, Immanuel (1998) “Organizing immigrant communities: UNITE's workers center strategy,” in Bronfenbrenner, Kate (ed.) Organizing to Win: New Research on Union Strategies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC) (1993) North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation between the Government of the United States of America, the Government of Canada, and the Government of the United Mexican States. Final Draft, 13 September.Google Scholar
Rothman, Franklin D., and Oliver, Pamela E. (1999) “From local to global: The anti-dam movement in Southern Brazil, 1979-1992.” Mobilization: An International Journal 4 (1): 41–57.Google Scholar
Roxborough, Ian (1984) Unions and Politics in Mexico: The Case of the Automobile Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sims, Beth (1992) Workers of the World Undermined: American Labor's Role in U.S. Foreign Policy. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
Sin Fronteras (2002) “Sin Fronteras Organizing Project.” Available on-line at www.farmworkers.org/sfentran.html (accessed 20 April)Google Scholar
Smith, Jackie (2001) “Globalizing resistance: The Battle of Seattle and the future of social movements.” Mobilization 6 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Snow, David, Rochford, E. Burke Jr., Worden, Steven K., and Benford, Robert D. (1986) “Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation.” American Sociological Review 51: 461–81.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (1988) “National politics and collective action: Recent theory and research in Western Europe and the United States.” Annual Review of Sociology 14: 412–40.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (1998) “Fishnets, internets and catnets: Globalization and transnational collective action,” in Hanagan, Michael P., Page Moch, Leslie, and te Brake, Wayne (eds.) Challenging Authority: The Historical Study of Contentious Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 228–44.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (2001a) “Transnational politics: Contention and institutions in international politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 1–20.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (2001b) “Contentious politics in a composite polity,” in Imig, Doug and Tarrow, Sidney (eds.)Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield:233–51.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE) (2002) “International labor information and action site.” Available on-line at www.ueinternational.org/#AboutAlliance (accessed 19 April).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs/National Administrative Office (2002) “Status of submissions.” Available on-line at www.dol.gov/ILAB/programs/nao/status.htm (accessed 20 April).Google Scholar
United Steelworkers of America (USWA) (2002) Legal documents regarding USWA litigation against the U.S. government challenging NAFTA's constitutionality. Available on-line at www.fairtradewatch.org/nafta/lawsuit.html (accessed 17 April).Google Scholar
Waldinger, Roger, Erickson, Chris, Milkman, Ruth, Mitchell, Daniel J. B., Valenzuela, Abel, Wong, Kent, and Zeitlin, Maurice (1997) “Justice for Janitors: Organizing in difficult times.” Dissent 44 (winter):37–44.Google Scholar
Waterman, Peter (1988) “The new internationalisms: A more real thing than big, big Coke?Review 11 (summer):289–328.Google Scholar
Waterman, Peter (1998) Globalization, Social Movements, and the New Internationalisms. London: Mansell.Google Scholar
Williams, Edward J., and Smith, John Passé (1992) The Unionization of the Maquiladora Industry. San Diego: Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias, San Diego State University.Google Scholar
Williams, Edward J., and Stillerman, Joel (2001) “The unionization of the maquiladora industry and the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation: Strategies conceived and frustrated,” in Ganster, Paul (ed.) Cooperation, Environment, and Sustainability in Border Regions. San Diego: Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias, San Diego State University Press:147–70.Google Scholar