Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:02:03.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Transformation of the Canadian Domestic Servant, 1871–1931

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Eric W. Sager
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article uses the national sample of the 1901 census of Canada to compare the earnings of live-in domestic servants with the earnings of women in other occupations and to examine the ethnoreligious backgrounds of domestic servants. The hypothesis that domestic service offered relative material advantages, when room and board are taken into account, is rejected. The hypothesis that female domestic servants came from a narrow range of specific ethnoreligious backgrounds is also rejected. The changing backgrounds and expectations of female domestic servants in the early twentieth century exacerbated class tensions in the service sector, helping ensure that domestic service remained an occupation of short duration and high turnover. The conclusion is that domestic service did not simply decline; rather, a work process was transformed. Demographic changes combined with changes in family and individual strategies to limit the supply of labor. When efforts to increase labor supply failed, bourgeois employers attempted to replace labor with new household technology; the wage-paid occupation of the domestic servant declined and was replaced by that of the unpaid housewife.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , Winter 2007 , pp. 509 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, Morris (1992) “Revised real Canadian GNP estimates and Canadian economic growth, 1870–1926.” Review of Income and Wealth 38: 455–73.Google Scholar
Barber, Marilyn (1980) “The women Ontario welcomed: Immigrant domestics for Ontario homes, 1870–1930.” Ontario History 72 (3): 148–72.Google Scholar
Barber, Marilyn (1984) “Below stairs: The domestic servant.” Material History Bulletin 19: 37–46.Google Scholar
Barber, Marilyn(1991) Immigrant Domestic Servants in Canada. Booklet 16. Ottawa: Canadian Historical Association.Google Scholar
Baskerville, Peter (2000) “Displaying the working class: The 1901 census of Canada.” Historical Methods 33: 229–34.Google Scholar
Baskerville, Peter(2001) “Familiar strangers: Urban families with boarders, Canada, 1901.” Social Science History 25: 321–46.Google Scholar
Baskerville, PeterandSager, Eric W. (1998) Unwilling Idlers: The Urban Unemployed and Their Families in Late Victorian Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Beattie, Betsy (2000) Obligation and Opportunity: Single Maritime Women in Boston, 1870–1930. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Bras, Hilde (2003) “Maids to the city: Migration patterns of female domestic servants from the province of Zeeland, the Netherlands (1850–1950).” History of the Family 8: 217–46.Google Scholar
Bras, Hildeand Kok, Jan (2003) “‘Naturally, every child was supposed to work’: Determinants of the leaving home process in the Netherlands, 1850–1940,” in Poppel, F. Van ,Oris, M., and Lee, J. (eds.) The Road to Independence: Leaving Home in Western and Eastern Societies, Sixteenth-Twentieth Centuries. Bern: Lang: 403–50.Google Scholar
Burke, Stacie D. A. (2001) “Marriage in 1901 Canada: An ecological perspective.” Journal of Family History 26: 189–219.Google Scholar
Canadian Families Project (2002) 1901 Census of Canada Database [machine-readable dataset], web.uvic.ca/hrd/cfp/index.html. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Census Office (1907) Census and Statistics Bulletin I: Wage Earners by Occupation. Ottawa: Dawson.Google Scholar
Cowan, Ruth Schwarz (1976) “The ‘industrial revolution’ in the home: Household technology and social change in the twentieth century.” Technology and Culture 17: 1–23.Google Scholar
Cowan, Ruth Schwarz (1983) More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Darroch, Gordonand Ornstein, Michael (1980) “Ethnicity and occupational structure in Canada in 1871: The vertical mosaic in historical perspective.” Canadian Historical Review 61: 305–33.Google Scholar
Darroch, Gordon and Ornstein, Michael(2000) Canadian Historical Mobility Project: 1871 Census SPSS Portable File. Toronto: Institute for Social Research, York University.Google Scholar
Darroch, Gordon and Soltow, Lee (1991) Property and Inequality in Victorian Ontario: Structural Patterns and Cultural Communities in the 1871 Census. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Day, Tanis (1992) “Capital-labour substitution in the home.” Technology and Culture 33: 302–27.Google Scholar
Dodd, Dianne (1989) “Delivering electrical technology to the Ontario housewife, 1920–1939: An alliance of professional women, advertisers, and the electrical industry.” PhD diss., Carleton University.Google Scholar
Dominion Bureau of Statistics (1924) Census of Canada, 1921. Vols. 4–5. Ottawa: King's Printer.Google Scholar
Dominion Bureau of Statistics (1933) Census of Canada, 1931. Vol. 5. Ottawa: King's Printer.Google Scholar
Eaton, Flora McCrea (1956) Memory's Wall: The Autobiography of Flora McCrea Eaton. Toronto: Clarke, Irwin.Google Scholar
Fahrni, Magda (1997) “‘Ruffled’ mistresses and ‘discontented’ maids: Respectability and the case of domestic service, 1880–1914.” Labour/Le Travail 39: 69–97.Google Scholar
Gagnier, Regenia (1991) Subjectivities: A History of Self-Representation in Britain, 1832–1920. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gee, Ellen M. (1982) “Marriage in nineteenth-century Canada.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 19: 311–25.Google Scholar
Glazebrook, G.de T., Brett, Katharine, and McErvel, Judith (1969) A Shopper's View of Canada's Past: Pages from Eaton's Catalogues, 1886–1910. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Gomersall, Meg (1994) “Education for domesticity? A nineteenth-century perspective on girls' schooling and education.” Gender and Education 6: 1–12.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Frances and Taylor, Ryan (1996) Much to Be Done: Private Life in Ontario from Victorian Diaries. Toronto: Natural Heritage/Natural History.Google Scholar
Horn, Pamela (1975) The Rise and Fall of the Victorian Servant. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Hotten-Somers, Diane M. (2001) “Relinquishing and reclaiming independence: Irish domestic servants, American middle-class mistresses, and assimilation, 1850–1920.” Eire-Ireland 36: 185–201.Google Scholar
Katzman, David M. (1978) Seven Days a Week: Women and Domestic Service in Industrializing America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gazette, Labour (1900) “Schedule showing rates paid for board and lodging by workingmen.” 1: 100.Google Scholar
Lacelle, Claudette (1987) Urban Domestic Servants in Nineteenth-Century Canada. Ottawa: Environment Canada.Google Scholar
Lasser, Carol (1987) “The domestic balance of power: Relations between mistresses and maids in nineteenth-century New England.” Labor History 28: 5–22.Google Scholar
Lenskyj, Helen (1981) “A ‘servant problem’ or a ‘servant-mistress problem’? Domestic service in Canada, 1890–1930.” Atlantis 7: 3–11.Google Scholar
Leslie, Genevieve (1974) “Domestic service in Canada, 1880–1920,” in Janice, Acton, Goldsmith, Penny, and Shepard, Bonnie (eds.) Women at Work: Ontario, 1850–1930. Toronto: Canadian Women's Educational Press: 71–125.Google Scholar
Lindstrom-Best, Varpu (1988) Defiant Sisters: A Social History of Finnish Immigrant Women in Canada. Toronto: Multicultural History Society of Ontario.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, Alison (1997) Love and Freedom: Professional Women and the Reshaping of Personal Life. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, Mary-Etta (1963) Shopkeepers to a Nation: The Eatons. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Marchand, Suzanne (1988) “L'impact des innovations technologiques sur la vie quotidienne des Québécoises du début du XXe siècle (1910–1940).” Material History Bulletin 28: 1–14.Google Scholar
McBride, Theresa M. (1976) The Domestic Revolution: The Modernisation of Household Service in England and France, 1820–1920. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
McDermid, Jane (2005) The Schooling of Working-Class Girls in Victorian Scotland: Gender, Education, and Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McLean, Lorna R., and Barber, Marilyn (2004) “In search of comfort and independence: Irish immigrant domestic servants encounter the courts, jails, and asylums in nineteenth-century Ontario,” in Epp, M., Iacovetta, F., and Swyripa, F. (eds.) Sisters or Strangers? Immigrant, Ethnic, and Racialized Women in Canadian History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press: 133–60.Google Scholar
Mertens, Walter (1976) “Canadian nuptiality patterns: 1911–1961.” Canadian Studies in Population 3: 57–71.Google Scholar
North Atlantic Population Project and Minnesota Population Center (2004) NAPP: Complete Count Microdata: Canada 1881. Preliminary Version NAPP 0.2 [machine-readable dataset]. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center, www.nappdata.org.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Michael (2000) “Analysis of household samples: The 1901 census of Canada.” Historical Methods 33: 195–99.Google Scholar
Palmer, Phyllis M.(1989) Domesticity and Dirt: Housewives and Domestic Servants in the United States, 1920–1945. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Paping, Richard (2004) “Family strategies concerning migration and occupations of children in a market-oriented agricultural economy.” History of the Family 9: 159–91.Google Scholar
Parr, Joy (1999) Domestic Goods: The Material, the Moral, and the Economic in the Postwar Years. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Janice Williams (2003) Selling Mrs. Consumer: Christine Frederick and the Rise of Household Efficiency. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Sager, Eric W. (2000) “National data on working-class earnings: The 1901 census of Canada.” Historical Methods 33: 235–41.Google Scholar
Sager, Eric W. (2007) “Inequality, earnings, and the Canadian working class in 1901,” in Sager, Eric W. and Baskerville, Peter (eds.) Household Counts: Canadian Families and Households in 1901. Toronto: University of Toronto Press: 339–70.Google Scholar
Sager, Eric W., and Morier, Christopher (2002) “Immigrants, ethnicity, and earnings in 1901: Revisiting Canada's vertical mosaic.” Canadian Historical Review 83: 196–229.Google Scholar
Sager, Eric W., Thompson, Douglas K., and Trottier, Marc (2002). The National Sample of the 1901 Census of Canada: User's Guide. Victoria, BC: Canadian Families Project.Google Scholar
Salverson, Laura Goodman (1981 [1939]) Confessions of an Immigrant's Daughter. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Leonard (1999) “English servants and their employers during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.” Economic History Review 52: 236–56.Google Scholar
Scott, Jean Thomson (1892) The Conditions of Female Labour in Ontario. Toronto: Warwick.Google Scholar
Starkins, Edward (1984) Who Killed Janet Smith? The 1924 Vancouver Killing That Remains Canada's Most Intriguing Unsolved Murder. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Strasser, Susan (1982) Never Done: A History of American Housework. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Daniel E. (1981) Americans and Their Servants: Domestic Service in the United States from 1800 to 1920. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Kenneth M. (2001) “Household composition and Canada's rural capitalism: The extent of rural labor markets in 1901.” Journal of Family History 26: 289–309.Google Scholar
Takai, Yukari (2001) “Shared earnings, unequal responsibilities: Single French-Canadian wage-earning women in Lowell, Massachusetts, 1900–1920.” Labour/Le Travail 47: 115–32.Google Scholar