Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:51:11.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Search for Ideas in Historical Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

William O. Aydelotte
William O. Aydelotte*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There has been over the last several decades an active campaign for the use of systematic methods in historical research, particularly for the verification of contentions by the most rigorous means that our information and our analytical tools, quantitative ones when possible, can provide. It is probably correct to say that by now this battle is largely won, in principle at least. Few historians still object to formal arrangement of the evidence or to counting, even if many of them do not do things quite this way themselves. Methods that a generation ago were regarded as outrageous and on the lunatic fringe of scholarship are no longer controversial. It is true that a few diehards in the profession still protest against these innovations. On the other hand, some at the opposite end of the methodological spectrum contend that we have not gone far enough—that historical projects have not maintained acceptable technical standards and that ventures of historians into formal methods have been elementary and intellectually sloppy (Kousser, 1977). It is proper that these questions should be raised and no doubt there is room for improvement. Yet at least scholars have become aware of the value of systematic research and have begun to discuss in constructive fashion what needs to be done to make it more effective.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , Fall 1981 , pp. 371 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are pleased to present a revised version of Professor Aydelotte’s Presidential Address to the Social Science History Association, 8 November 1980.

References

Aydelotte, W. O. (1971) “The problem of historical generalization,” pp. 66–100 in Quantification in History. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Barber, B. (1952) Science and the Social Order. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Barber, B. and Fox, R. (1958) “The case of the floppy-eared rabbits: an instance of serendipity gained and serendipity lost.” Amer. J. of Sociology 64 (July): 128–136.Google Scholar
Beveridge, W.I.B. (1957) The Art of Scientific Investigation (rev. ed.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Cannon, W. B. (1945) The Way of an Investigator. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Crump, C. G. (1928) History and Historical Research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1961) “The behavioral approach in political science: epitaph for a monument to a successful protest.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 55 (December): 763–772.Google Scholar
Deutsch, K. W., Platt, J., and Senghass, D. (1971) “Conditions favoring major advances in social science.” Science 171: 450–459.Google Scholar
Dyson, F. (1979) “Disturbing the universe—II.” New Yorker (August 13): 64–88.Google Scholar
Elton, G. R. (1977) “The historian’s social function” (Presidential Address). Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th Series, 27: 197–211.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. W. (1841) “Self-reliance,” in Essays. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1883: 45–87.Google Scholar
Eulau, H. (1969) Micro-Macro Political Analysis: Accents of Inquiry. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Fogel, R. W. (1979) “Notes on the social saving Controversy (Presidential Address). J. of Economic History 39 (March): 1–54.Google Scholar
Fogel, R. W. (1967) “The specification problem in economic history.” J. of Economic History 27 (September): 283–308.Google Scholar
Gibbon, E. (1796) Autobiography (reprinted). London: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1939.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. (1978) “Conquest, capitulation, and Indian treaties” (Presidential Address). Amer. Historical Rev. 83 (February): 1–15.Google Scholar
Hadamard, J. (1945) An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Herodotus, (5th century B.C.) The Histories (Aubrey de Sélincourt, trans.; rev. by Burn, A. R.). Hammondsworth, England: Penguin, 1972.Google Scholar
James, H. (1934) The Art of the Novel: Critical Prefaces. With an introduction by Blackmur, Richard P.. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1925) “Alfred Marshall, 1842-1924,” in Pigou, A. C. (ed.) Memorials of Alfred Marshall (reprinted). New York: A. M. Kelley, 1966.Google Scholar
Kitson Clark, G. (1958) Guide for Research Students Working on Historical Subjects. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kousser, J. M. (1977) “The agenda for ‘social science history.’” Social Sci. History 1 (Spring): 383–391.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1977) The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: Univ. of Chi cago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1961) “The function of measurement in modern physical science,” pp. 31–63 in Woolf, H. (ed.) Quantification: A History of the Meaning of Measurement in the Natural and Social Sciences. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Medawar, P. B. (1968) Review of the Double Helix. New York Review of Books (28 March): 3–5.Google Scholar
Medawar, P. B. (1967) The Art of the Soluble. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure (rev. ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1965) On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Milton, J. (1644) “Areopagitica: A Speech for the Liberty of Unlicenc’d Printing, to the Parliament of England,” pp. 486–570 in Complete Prose Works, Vol. II, 1643-1648. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Pasteur, L. (1854) Inaugural Address at Lille, in Vallery-Radot, R. (trans.) The Life of Pasteur. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1926.Google Scholar
Patterson, S. C. (1973) “Review article: The British House of Commons as a focus for political research.” British J. of Pol. Sci. 3 (July): 363–381.Google Scholar
Poincare, H. (1913) “Mathematical creation” (trans.), pp. 383–394 in The Foundations of Science. New York: Science Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Remer, T. G. (1965) Serendipity and the Three Princes, from the Peregrinaggio of 1557. With a Preface by Lewis, W. S.. Norman: Univ. of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Sarton, G. (1956) The History of Science and the New Humanism. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Sarton, M. (1980) Recovering: A Journal. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Sarton, M. (1973) Journal of a Solitude. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Sarton, M. (1957) The Writing of a Poem: An Address. Scripps College Bull. 31 (February): 1–17.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1977) Models of Discovery, and Other Topics in the Methods of Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Wahlke, J. C. (1968) “Legislative behavior,” pp. 237–243 in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 9. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. (1960) Quoted in “Topics.” New York Times (July 14): 26.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1948) Science and the Modern World. New York: Pelican Mentor.Google Scholar
Woolf, V. (1954) A Writer’s Diary. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar