Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:56:04.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Punishment, Power, and History

Foucault and Elias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Pieter Spierenburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reevaluates the work of Michel Foucault and Norbert Elias, in so far as it relates to criminal justice history. After an examination of the content of Foucault’s Surveiller et punir (1975), it discusses Foucault’s receptions among criminal justice historians. Some of the latter appear to have attributed views to the French philosopher that are not backed up by his 1975 study. Notably the “revisionist” historians of prisons have done so. As a preliminary conclusion, it is posited that Foucault and Elias have more in common than some scholars, including the author in earlier publications, have argued. They resemble each other to the extent that they both thought it imperative to analyze historical change in order to better understand our own world.

Nevertheless, Elias is to be preferred over Foucault when it concerns (1) the pace of historical change and (2) these theorists’ conception of power. It is demonstrated that Foucault’s notion of an abrupt and total change of the penal system between 1760 and 1840 is incongruent with reality and leads to ad hoc explanations. Rather, a long-term change occurred from about 1600 onward, while several elements of the modern penal system (as claimed by Foucault) did not become visible until after 1840. With respect to the concept of power, Elias and Foucault converge again on one crucial point: the notion of the omnipresence of power. However, whereas Elias defines power as a structural property of every social relationship and acknowledges its two-sidedness, Foucault’s concept of power has a more top-down character, and he often depicts power as an external force that people have to accommodate. Although Foucault’s notion of the interconnectedness of power and knowledge is valuable, Elias has a more encompassing view of sources of power.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , Winter 2004 , pp. 607 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, Peter (2002) Verderbnis und Entartung: Eine Geschichte der Kriminologie des 19. Jahrhunderts als Diskurs und Praxis. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Behrens, Ulrich (1999) “Sozialdisziplinierung als konzeption der frühneuzeitforschung.” Historische Mitteilungen 12: 35–68.Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc Léopold Benjamin (1963 [1928])“Pour une histoire comparée des sociétés Européennes,” in Mélanges historiques. Vol.1. Paris: S.E.V.P.E.N.: 16–40.Google Scholar
Brieler, Ulrich (1998) “Foucault’s geschichte.” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 24: 248–82.Google Scholar
Brown, Howard G. (1997) “From organic society to security state: The war on brigandage in France, 1797–1802.”Journal of Modern History 69: 661–95.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter, ed. (1992) Critical Essays on Michel Foucault. Critical Thought Series, No. 2. Aldershot, U.K.: Scolar.Google Scholar
Camus, Albert, and Koestler, Arthur (1957)Réflexions sur la peine capitale. Introduction et étude de Jean Bloch-Michel. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar
Castan, Nicole (1980) Les criminels de Languedoc: Les exigences d’ordre et les voies du ressentiment dans une société pré-révolutionnaire, 1750–1790. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-le-Mirail.Google Scholar
Cobb, Richard (1970) The Police and the People: French Popular Protest, 1789–1820. Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dinges, Martin (1994) Der Maurermeister und der Finanzrichter: Ehre, Geld, und soziale Kontrolle im Paris des 18. Jahrhunderts. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Dinges, Martin (1996) “Michel Foucault’s impact on the German historiography of criminal justice, social discipline, and medicalization,” in Finzsch, Norbert and Jütte, Robert (eds.)Institutions of Confinement: Hospitals, Asylums, and Prisons in Western Europe and North America, 1500-1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 155–74.Google Scholar
Eisner, Manuel (2001) “Modernization, self-control, and lethal violence: The long-term dynamics of European homicide rates in theoretical perspective.” British Journal of Criminology 41: 618–38.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert (1939) Über den Prozess der Zivilisation: Soziogenetische und psycho-genetische Untersuchungen. 2 vols. Bern: Haus zum Falcken.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert (1969) Die höfische Gesellschaft: Untersuchungen zur Soziologie des Königtums und der höfischen Aristokratie. Berlin: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert (1971 [1970]) Wat is sociologie. Utrecht: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert (1984) “Knowledge and power: An interview by Peter Ludes,” in Stehr, Nico and Meja, Volker (eds.) Society and Knowledge: Contemporary Perspectives in the Sociology of Knowledge. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction: 251–91.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert (1992) Studien über die Deutschen: Machtkämpfe und Habitusentwicklung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Evans, Richard J. (1996) Rituals of Retribution: Capital Punishment in Germany, 1600–1987. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farge, Arlette, and Foucault, Michel (1982) Le désordre des familles: Lettres de cachet des Archives de la Bastille au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1961) Folie et déraison: Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1975) Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1976a) Mikrophysik der Macht: Michel Foucault über Strafjustiz, Psychiatrie, und Medizin. Berlin: Merve Verlag.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1976b) Histoire de la sexualité. Vol. 1, La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Franke, Herman (1990) Twee eeuwen gevangen: Misdaad en straf in Nederland. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.Google Scholar
Franke, Herman (1995) The Emancipation of Prisoners: A Socio-Historical Analysis of the Dutch Prison Experience. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Frey, Manuel (1997) Der reinliche Bürger: Entstehung und Verbreitung bürgerlicher Tugenden in Deutschland, 1760–1860. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Garland, David (1985) Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies. Aldershot, U.K.: Gower.Google Scholar
Garland, David (1990) Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gatrell, V. A. C. (1994) The Hanging Tree: Execution and the English People, 1770–1868. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gellately, Robert (1990) The Gestapo and German Society: Enforcing Racial Policy, 1933–1945. Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Gellately, Robert (1996) “The prerogatives of confinement in Germany, 1933-1945: ‘Protective custody’ and other police strategies, ”in Finzsch, Norbert and Jütte, Robert (eds.) Institutions of Confinement: Hospitals, Asylums, and Prisons in Western Europe and North America, 1500–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 191–211.Google Scholar
Gellately, Robert (2001) Backing Hitler: Consent and Coercion in Nazi Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halttunen, Karen (1995) “Humanitarianism and the pornography of pain in Anglo-American culture.” American Historical Review 100: 303–34.Google Scholar
Hufton, Olwen H. (1974) The Poor of Eighteenth-Century France, 1750-1789. Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael (1978) A Just Measure of Pain: The Penitentiary in the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1850. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael (1983) “State, civil society, and total institution: A critique of recent social histories of punishment,” in Sugarman, David (ed.) Legality, Ideology, and the State. London: Academic: 183–211.Google Scholar
Kaluszynski, Martine (2002) La république à l’épreuve du crime: La construction du crime comme objet politique, 1880–1920. Paris: L.G.D.J.Google Scholar
Kim, Eun-Young (1995) Norbert Elias im Diskurs von Moderne und Postmoderne: Ein Rekonstruktionsversuch der Eliasschen Theorie im Licht der Diskussion von Foucault und Habermas. Marburg: Tectum.Google Scholar
Lavisse, Ernest (1909) Histoire de France depuis les origines jusqu’à la Révolution. Vol.8, pt. 2, Le règne de Louis XV (1715–1774). Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Morris, Norval, and Rothman, David J., eds. (1995)The Oxford History of the Prison. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mucchielli, Laurent, ed. (1994) Histoire de la criminologie française. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Nye, Robert A. (1984) Crime, Madness, and Politics in Modern France: The Medical Concept of National Decline. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, Robert A. (1993) Masculinity and Male Codes of Honor in Modern France. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perrot, Michelle, ed. (1980) L’impossible prison: Recherches sur le système pénitentiaire au 19e siècle (debate with Michel Foucault). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Peterson, Alan, and Bunton, Robin, eds. (1997)Foucault, Health, and Medicine. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Petit, Jacques-Guy (1990) Ces peines obscures: La prison pénale en France, 1780–1875. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Petit, Jacques-Guy, ed. (1984) La prison, le bagne et l’histoire. Genève: Librairie des Méridiens.Google Scholar
Petit, Jacques-Guy, Faugeron, Claude, and Pierre, Michel (2002) Histoire des prisons en France, 1789–2000: Le système pénitentiaire et les bagnes d’outre-mer. Toulouse: Privat.Google Scholar
Revue des grands procès contemporains (1939) “l’Affaire Weidmann.” Revue des grands procès contemporains 45 (October-December): 417–85.Google Scholar
Roding, Juliette (1986) Schoon en net: Hygiëne in woning en stad; de cultuurgeschiedenis van bad en toilet. The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij.Google Scholar
Rothman, David J. (1971) The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rothman, David J. (1980) Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and Its Alternatives in Progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Scull, Andrew T. (1979) Museums of Madness: The Social Organization of Insanity in Nineteenth-Century England. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Scull, Andrew T. (1993) The Most Solitary of Afflictions: Madness and Society in Britain, 1700–1900. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sharpe, James A. (2000) “Civility, civilizing processes, and the end of public punishment in England,” in Burke, Peter, Harrison, Brian, and Slack, Paul (eds.) Civil Histories: Essays Presented to Sir Keith Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 215–30.Google Scholar
Spierenburg, Pieter (1984) The Spectacle of Suffering: Executions and the Evolution of Repression; From a Preindustrial Metropolis to the European Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spierenburg, Pieter (1991) The Prison Experience: Disciplinary Institutions and Their Inmates in Early Modern Europe. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Spierenburg, Pieter (1996) “Long-term trends in homicide: Theoretical reflections and Dutch evidence, fifteenth to twentieth centuries,” in Johnson, Eric A. and Monkkonen, Eric H. (eds.) The Civilization of Crime: Violence in Town and Country since the Middle Ages. Urbana: University of Illinois Press: 63–105.Google Scholar
Spierenburg, Pieter (2001) “Violence and the civilizing process: Does it work?” Crime, Histoire & Sociétés/Crime, History & Society 5(2): 87–105.Google Scholar
Stearns, Peter N., ed. (2001) Encyclopedia of European Social History from 1350 to 2000. Vol.3. Detroit: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Szakolczai, Arpád (1998) Max Weber and Michel Foucault: Parallel Life-Works. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wiener, Martin J. (1990) Reconstructing the Criminal: Culture, Law, and Policy in England, 1830–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar