Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:40:10.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Problem of Solidarity in Insurgent Collective Action: The Nore Mutiny of 1797

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2016

Steven Pfaff ,
Michael Hechter  and
Katie E. Corcoran
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do insurgents engaged in high-risk collective action maintain solidarity when faced with increasing costs and dangers? Based on a combination of process tracing through qualitative evidence and an event-history analysis of a unique data set assembled from naval archives concerning a mass mutiny in the Royal Navy in 1797, this article explains why insurgent solidarity varied among the ships participating in the mutiny. Maintaining solidarity was the key problem that the organizers of the mutiny faced in confronting government repression and inducements for ships’ companies to defect. Solidarity, proxied here as the duration of a ship's company's adherence to the mutiny, relied on techniques used by the mutiny leadership that increased dependence and imposed control over rank-and-file seamen. In particular, mutiny leaders monitored and sanctioned compliance and exploited informational asymmetries to persuade seamen to stand by the insurgency, even as prospects for its success faded.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , Summer 2016 , pp. 247 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlquist, J., and Levi, M. (2013) In the Interest of Others: Organizations and Social Activism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, S. M. S. (2007) Rethinking the Mau Mau in Colonial Kenya. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, P. D. (1984) Event History Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A. (2010) “Process tracing and causal inference,” in Brady, H. and Collier, D. (eds.) Rethinking Social Inquiry, 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield: 207–19.Google Scholar
Berman, E. (2009) Radical, Religious and Violent. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, J., and Jones, B. S. (2004) Event-History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, H. E., and Collier, D., eds. (2010) Rethinking Social Inquiry, 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brenton, E. P. (1837) The Naval History of Great Britain from the Year 1783 to 1836. Vol. 1. London: Henry Colburn.Google Scholar
Brown, A. G. (2006) “The Nore mutiny: Sedition or ships’ biscuits?” The Mariner's Mirror 92 (1): 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, C. (1982) The Question of Class Struggle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chong, D. (1991) Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coats, A. V. (2011) “The delegates: A radical tradition,” in Coats, A. V. and MacDougall, P. (eds.) The Naval Mutinies of 1797. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell: 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coats, A. V., and MacDougall, P., eds. (2011) The Naval Mutinies of 1797. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colley, L. (2003) Britons: Forging a Nation, 1707–1837, 2nd ed. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
Cook, K. S., Hardin, R., and Levi, M., eds. (2005) Cooperation without Trust? New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Costa, D. L., and Kahn, M. E. (2008) Heroes and Cowards. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. (1972) “Regression models and life tables.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34 (2): 187–202.Google Scholar
Cramton, P., and Tracy, J. (2003) “Unions, bargaining and strikes,” in Addison, J. and Schnabel, C. (eds.) International Handbook of Trade Unions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: ch. 4.Google Scholar
Diani, M., and McAdam, D., eds. (2003) Social Movements and Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, W. (1990) The Oxford History of the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (1965) The Great Mutiny. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Dull, J. (2009) The Age of the Ship of the Line. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Earle, P. (1998) Sailors. London: Meuthen.Google Scholar
Fantasia, R. (1988) Cultures of Solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Field, C. (1924) Britain's Sea-Soldiers. Liverpool: Lyceum.Google Scholar
Fortescu, J. W. (1902) History of the British Army IV/I. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Frykman, N. (2009) “Seamen on late eighteenth-century European warships.” International Review of Social History 54 (1): 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambetta, D. (2011) “Signaling,” in Hedstrom, P. and Bearman, P. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press: 168–94.Google Scholar
Gates, S. (2002) “Recruitment and allegiance: The microfoundations of rebellion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (1): 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, J. (2007) Case Study Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. N. (1983) “The nature of mutiny in the British navy in the eighteenth century,” in Masterson, D. M. (ed.) Naval History. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources: 111–20.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1913) The Naval Mutinies of 1797. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Glasco, J. D. (2004) “The seaman feels himself a man.” International Labor and Working-Class History 66: 40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, A. (1979) The Friends of Liberty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, R. (1995) Insurgent Identities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Guala, F. (2012) “Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1): 1–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habyarimana, J., Humphreys, M., Posner, D. N., and Weinstein, J. M. (2009) Coethnicity: Diversity and the Dilemmas of Collective Action. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Hattendorf, J. B., Knight, R. J. B., Pearsall, A. W. H., Rodger, N. A. M., and Till, G., eds. (1993) British Naval Documents, 1204–1960. Aldershot: Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Hechter, M. (1987) Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hechter, M. (1998) Internal Colonialism, 2nd ed. New York: Transaction.Google Scholar
Heckathorn, D. (1996) “Dynamics and dilemmas of collective action.” American Sociological Review 61 (2): 250–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1996) Leviathan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hovi, J. (1998) Games, Threats, and Treaties. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Janowitz, M., and Shils, E. (1948) “Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht .” Public Opinion Quarterly 12 (2): 280–315.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, S. (2006). The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, S., and Kocher, M. (2007) “How ‘free’ is free riding in civil wars? Violence, insurgency and the collective action problem.” World Politics 59 (2): 177–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, W. B. (1990) “The united Irishmen and the great naval mutiny of 1797.” Eire 25 (3): 7–18.Google Scholar
Kerr, C., and Siegal, A. (1954) “The interindustry propensity to stike,” in Kornhauser, A., Dugan, R., and Ross, A. M. (eds.) Industrial Conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill: 189–212.Google Scholar
Land, I. (2009) War, Nationalism and the British Sailor, 1750–1850. New York: Palgrave and Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavery, B. (2010) Royal Tars: The Lower Deck of the Royal Navy, 875–1850. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.Google Scholar
Leeson, P. T. (2010) “Rational choice, round robin, and rebellion.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 73 (3): 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, M. (1998) The Rebel's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Loveman, M. (1998) “High risk collective action: Defending human rights in Chile, Uruguay, and Argentina.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (2): 477–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luongo, K. (2011) Witchcraft and Colonial Rule in Kenya, 1900–1955. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDougall, P. (2011) “Reporting the mutinies in the provincial press,” in Coats, A. V. and MacDougall, P. (eds.) The Naval Mutinies of 1797. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell: 161–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, N. (1967) Secret Societies. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Manwaring, G. E., and Dobrée, B. (1987) The Floating Republic. London: Cresset.Google Scholar
Martin, D. L. (1980) The Economic Analysis of Trade Unions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mathew, S., and Boyd, R. (2011) “Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (28): 11375–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLynn, F. (1989) Crime and Punishment in Eighteenth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neale, J. (1985) The Cutlass and the Lash. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Oliver, H. (1941) “War and inflation since 1790 in England, France, Germany, and the United States.” American Economic Review 30 (5): 544–51.Google Scholar
Ownby, D., and Heidhues, M. S., eds. (1993) Secret Societies Reconsidered. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Rasmusen, E. (2007) Games and Information. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rediker, M. (1987) Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodger, N. A. M. (1986) The Wooden World. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Rodger, N. A. M. (2003) “Mutiny or subversion: Spithead and the Nore,” in Bartlett, T., Dickson, D., Keogh, D., and Whelan, K. (eds.) 1798: A Bicentenary Perspective. Dublin: Four Courts: 549–64.Google Scholar
Rodger, N. A. M. (2004) The Command of the Ocean: A Naval History of Britain, 1649–1815. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1980) The Making of the English Working Class, rev. ed. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Twigger, R. (1999) “Inflation: The value of the pound 1750–1998.” Research Paper 99/20, Economic Policy and Statistics Section, House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
Viterna, J. (2006) “Pulled, pushed and persuaded: Explaining women's mobilization into the Salvadoran guerilla army.” American Journal of Sociology 112 (1): 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, J. M. (2007) Inside Rebellion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, R. (1983) Insurrection: The British Experience, 1795–1803. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Wolcott, S. (2008) “Strikes in colonial India, 1921–1938.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 61 (4): 460–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, E. J. (2003) Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar