Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:34:01.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poverty and Physical Stature: Evidence on the Standard of Living of London Boys 1770–1870

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Roderick Floud  and
Kenneth W. Wachter
Roderick Floud
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, London
Kenneth W. Wachter
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

To many historians, and to most of their students, the question of the impact of the Industrial Revolution upon the poor of Britain has become confused, an arcane debate of ever greater statistical complexity. This is a pity, for “the most sustained single controversy in British economic history” still has, and should have, the capacity to excite and rouse the imagination, as it did for those who began, in the first half of the nineteenth century, the Condition of England debate (Mathias, 1975: vii; Taylor, 1975: xi). For Friedrich Engels, Edwin Chadwick, John Stuart Mill, or Lord Shaftesbury, and for many who as government inspectors or members of local statistical societies provided the evidence, the condition of the working classes was something tangible, to be seen in the streets of Manchester or London, demonstrated in the faces and bodies of the artisans and laborers who walked those streets and worked in the workshops and factories. The moral outrage felt by Engels, Chadwick, Shaftesbury, Barnardo, and many others in the nineteenth century came from the sight not only of squalid living conditions but of the malnourished bodies of the poor themselves.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , Fall 1982 , pp. 422 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1982 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Colleagues in the NBER Nutrition Project, Annabel Gregory and Harvey Goldstein, have given us valuable suggestions, and Ruth Deuel and Sunchai Rajadhon have assisted us. We have benefitted from comments at the Stanford-Berkeley Colloquium in Historical Demography, the Berkeley Economic History Seminar, the Stanford Social Science History Workshop, the Social Science Seminar of the California Institute of Technology, and the Economic History seminars at Birkbeck College, London, and Oxford University.

References

Berridge, V., and Edwards, G. (1981) Opium and the People. London: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Cleveland, W. (1979) “Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots.” J. of the Amer. Stat. Assn. 74: 829–836.Google Scholar
Eveleth, P. B., and Tanner, J. M. (1976) Worldwide Variation in Human Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Flinn, M. W. [ed.] (1965) Report on the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain by Edwin Chadwick. London: Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fogel, R. W., Engerman, S. L., Floud, R., Steckel, R. H., Trussell, T. J., Wachter, K. W., Sokoloff, K., Villaflor, G., Margo, R. A., and Friedman, G. (1982) “Changes in American and British suture since the mid-eighteenth century: a preliminary report on the usefulness of data on height for the analysis of secular trends in nutrition, labor productivity, and labor welfare.” NBER Working Paper 890.Google Scholar
Frisancho, A. R., and Baker, P. T. (1970) “Altitude and growth.” Amer. J. of Physical Anthropology 32: 279–292.Google Scholar
George, M. D. (1925) London Life in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers (1904) Report of the Inter-departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration. London: xxxii.Google Scholar
Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers (1840) Reports from the Assistant Commissioners on Handloom Weavers. London: xxiii.Google Scholar
Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers (1833) Second Report of the Royal Commission on the Employment of Children in Factories. London: xxi.Google Scholar
Hanway, J. (1757) Letter from a Member of the Marine Society. London.Google Scholar
Joiner, G. H. (n.d.a) “The business of charity.” Georgia Southern College, (unpublished)Google Scholar
Joiner, G. H. (n.d.b) “The pea-jacket of charity: John Fielding, the London Police, and the origins of the British Marine Society.” Georgia Southern College, (unpublished)Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K. (1973) “Infantile vaccination and the secular change in stature.” Ethos 1: 499–503.Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K. and Whiting, J.W.M. (1981) “Correlates and consequences of human stress in infancy,” in Munroe, R. H., Munroe, R. L., and Whiting, B. B. (eds.) Handbook of Cross-Cultural Human Development. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Marine Society (1792) Regulations for Admission to the Society. London.Google Scholar
Marine Society (1756—) Manuscript Minutes, deposited at the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1867, 1961) Capital (Moore, S. and Aveling, E., trans.). Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing.Google Scholar
Mathias, P. (1975) “Preface,” in Taylor, A. J., The Standard of Living in Britain in the Industrial Revolution. London: Metheun.Google Scholar
Owen, D. (1964) English Philanthropy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A. (1842) A Treatise on Man. London.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A. (1838) Correspondence Mathematique et Physique, series l,ii,l. Paris.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. M. (1981) A History of the Study of Human Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. M., Whitehouse, R., and Takaishi, M. (1966) “Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity; British children 1965.” Archives of Disease in Childhood 41: 454–471, 613–635.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. J. (1975) The Standard of Living in Britain in the Industrial Revolution. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. S. (1936) “Real wages of artisans in London, 1729–1935.” J. of the Amer. Stat. Assn. 31.Google Scholar
Villerme, L. R. (1829) “Mémoire sur la taille de l’homme en France.” Annales d’hygiene publique 1: 551–559.Google Scholar
Wachter, K. W. (1981) “Graphical estimation of military heights.” Historical Methods 14: 31–42.Google Scholar
Wachter, K. W. and Floud, R. (1982) “Heights Among London’s poor 1770–1873.” Working Paper 5, Program in Population Research, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Wachter, K. W., and Trussell, J. (1982) “Estimating historical heights.” J. of the Amer. Stat. Assn. 77 (June): 279–303.Google Scholar
Wark, M. L. and Malcolm, L. A. (1969) “Growth and development of the Lumi child of the Sepik district of New Guinea.” Medical J. of Australia 2: 129–136.Google Scholar