Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:39:10.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Petitioners and Rebels: Petitioning for Parliamentary Reform in Regency England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2019

Abstract

The national petitioning campaign for parliamentary reform in 1816–17 was the biggest such movement before Chartism. It generated more than 700 local petitions with approaching a million signatures, representing perhaps 25 percent of adult males and extending the political nation well into the working classes. It was particularly strong in the Lancashire manufacturing districts, where economic grievances such as hunger and exploitation were converted through petitioning into arguments for political reform. The moving figure was Major John Cartwright, a veteran reformer who emerges as a more radical figure than usually supposed. The rejection of so many petitions by Parliament provided a legitimation for remonstrance and resistance, feeding through into extraparliamentary protests such as the march of the Manchester “Blanketeers” in 1817 and the mass platform movement of 1819 and “Peterloo.” The research combines a study of the petitions and the radical press with a close examination of the Home Office material, yielding insights into both grassroots organization and the strategies of the authorities, local and national. While the strategy of mass action was defeated by repression, the right of the unenfranchised masses to engage in political petitioning was conceded in principle long before the advent of formal democracy.

Type
Special Issue Article
Copyright
© Social Science History Association, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research for this article was made possible by a British Academy Small Research Grant, “The English Reform Movement of 1816–17: Understanding the Home Office Disturbances Papers” (SG 130774). I would like to thank Frank O’Gorman, Henry Miller, Malcolm Chase, and an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments and criticisms, while I remain responsible for the final result. The article owes more than might be apparent to my participation, 40 years ago, in the late Professor Austin Woolrych’s special subject at Lancaster University on “The English Revolution.”.

References

Agnés, Benoit (2013) “A Chartist Singularity? Mobilizing to Promote Democratic Petitions in Britain and France, 1838–1848.” Labour History Review (78): 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamford, Samuel (1967 [1844]) Passages in the Life of a Radical. London: Cass.Google Scholar
Belchem, John (1981) “Republicanism, Popular Constitutionalism and the Radical Platform in Early Nineteenth-Century England.” Social History (6): 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belchem, John (1985) “Orator” Hunt: Henry Hunt and English Working-Class Radicalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bohstedt, John (2010) The Politics of Provisions. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bradley, James (2007) “Parliament, Print Culture and Petitioning in Late Eighteenth-Century England.” Parliamentary History (26): 96111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canning, George (1820) Speech of the Rt. Hon, George Canning Delivered at Liverpool, March 1820. London: P. Kelleher.Google Scholar
Cartwright, F. D., ed. (1969 [1826]) The Life and Correspondence of Major Cartwright. 2 vols. New York: Kelley.Google Scholar
Cartwright, John (1817a) A Bill of Rights and Liberties. London: John McCreery & Effingham Wilson.Google Scholar
Cartwright, John (1817b) Letters to the Lord Mayor. London: William Hone.Google Scholar
Chase, Malcolm (1988) The People’s Farm: English Radical Agrarianism, 1775–1840. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chase, Malcolm (2019) “What Did Chartism Petition For? Mass Petitions in the British Movement for Democracy.” Social Science History 43 (3): 531–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornish, Rory T. (2004) “Cartwright, John (1740–1824),” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/4817 (accessed November 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Eckersley, Rachel (1999) The Drum Major of Sedition: The Political Life and Career of John Cartwright (1740–1824). PhD diss., University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Epstein, James (1994) Radical Expression: Political Language, Ritual and Symbol in England, 1790–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Handley, Robin (1986) “Public Order, Petitioning and Freedom of Assembly.” Journal of Legal Studies (7): 123–55.Google Scholar
Hampden, Club (1816) A Full Report of the Meeting of the Hampden Club 15 June 1816, upon the Subject of Parliamentary Reform. London: William Hone.Google Scholar
Hampden, Club (1822) A Collection of Reports of the Proceedings of the Hampden Club. London. (A unique item in British Library, shelfmark 8135.f.19).Google Scholar
Harris, Tim, ed. (2001) The Politics of the Excluded, c. 1500–1850. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hone, William (1817) Full Report of the Third Spa-Fields Meeting. London: William Hone.Google Scholar
Huish, Robert (1836) History of Henry Hunt. 2 vols. London: John Saunders.Google Scholar
Hunt, Henry (1820) Memoirs of Henry Hunt III, Project Gutenberg, www.gutenberg.org/.Google Scholar
Knights, Mark (2009) “Participation and Representation before Democracy: Petitions and Addresses in Britain,” in Shapiro, Ian, Stokes, Susan C., Wood, Elisabeth Jean, and Kirshner, Alexander S. (eds.) Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 3557.Google Scholar
Knights, Mark (2012) “The 1780 Protestant Petitions and the Culture of Petitioning,” in Haywood, Ian and Seed, John (eds.) The Gordon Riots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 4668.Google Scholar
Lobban, Michael (1990) “From Seditious Libel to Unlawful Assembly: Peterloo and the Changing Face of Political Crime, c. 1770–1820.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (10): 307–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockley, Philip (2013) Visionary Religion and Radicalism in Early Industrial England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Henry (2018) “Petitioning and Demonstrating,” in Brown, D., Pentland, G., and Crowcroft, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Modern British Political History, 1800–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Naomi C. (1968) “John Cartwright and Radical Parliamentary Reform, 1808–1819.” English Historical Review (82): 205–28.Google Scholar
Miller, Naomi C. (1974) “Major John Cartwright and the Founding of the Hampden Club.” Historical Journal (17): 615–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navickas, Katrina (2009) Loyalism and Radicalism in Lancashire 1789–1815. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Gorman, Frank (1986) “The Unreformed Electorate of Hanoverian England.” Social History (11): 3352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Gorman, Frank (1989) Voters, Patrons and Parties. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Operator” (1817) Petitioning Weavers Defended in Remarks on the Manchester Police Meeting of January 13 1817 (Manchester, 1817).Google Scholar
Parsinnen, T. M. (1973) “Parliament and Anti-Parliament in British Radical Politics, 1771–1848.” English Historical Review (88): 504–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacey, Jason (2016) “The Parliamentary Context of Political Radicalism in the English Revolution,” in Curelly, L. and Smith, N. (eds.) Radical Voices, Radical Ways. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press: 151–68.Google Scholar
Pearson, Charles (1820) The Substance of a Speech Delivered by Charles Pearson at the Court of Common Council of the City of London on the 6th of December 1819. London: Thomas Dolby.Google Scholar
Philips, John (1980) “Popular Politics in Unreformed England.” Journal of Modern History (52): 599625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Paul (2001) “And Your Petitioners &c.: Chartist Petitioning in Popular Politics, 1838–48.” English Historical Review (116): 368–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Robert (2009) “French Revolution or Peasants’ Revolt? Petitioners and Rebels from the Blanketeers to the Chartists.” Labour History Review (74): 626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Robert (2016a) “‘To the Last Drop of My Blood’: Politics and Melodrama in Early Nineteenth-Century England,” in Newey, K., Richards, J., and Yeandle, P. (eds.) Performance, Politics and Popular Culture in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press: 2143.Google Scholar
Poole, Robert (2016b) “The Risings of 1817.” Annual Luddite Memorial Lecture 2016, University of Huddersfield, www.huddersfieldhistory.org.uk/events-2/luddite-lecture/.Google Scholar
Poole, Robert (2019a) “The Manchester Observer 1818–1822: Biography of a Radical Newspaper.” Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 95(1), Spring 2019, open access at http://www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/journals/bjrl CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Robert (2019b) Peterloo: the English Uprising. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Poole, Steve (2000) The Politics of Regicide in England, 1750–1850. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, William (1974 [1828]) On the Origins of the New System of Manufacture, Commonly Called “Power-Loom Weaving.” Clifton, NJ: Augustus Kelley.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1991) Customs in Common. London: Merlin.Google Scholar
Thorne, R., ed. (1986) “The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1790–1820,” www.historyofparliamentonline.org/.Google Scholar
Vernon, James, ed. (1996) Re-Reading the Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waddell, Brodie (2016) “Was Early Modern England a Petitioning Society?” in Waddell, Brodie (ed.) Addressing Authority: An Online Symposium on Petitions and Supplications in Early Modern Society, https://manyheadedmonster.wordpress.com/2016/11/01/addressing-authority/ Google Scholar
Wood, Andy (2002) Riot, Rebellion and Popular Politics in Early Modern England. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolrych, Austin (2002) Britain in Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zaret, David (2000) Origins of Democratic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar