Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:05:31.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is It about Time?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Donna R. Gabaccia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The theme for the 2008 Social Science History Association conference was “It’s about Time.” By surveying the program and panels on offer in Miami, the presidential address instead asked, “Is it about time?” Location and space figured more centrally than time in the titles of the conference’s many papers. Still, two conceptions of time were prominent features of the program. For some scholars, the past is like a foreign country; it can be compared to the present. For even more of the 2008 presenters, however, interest in time meant a concern with process. The analysis of time reflected on the program seemed to have developed along disciplinary lines. Historians and life-course sociologists analyzed time through narratives, time lines, or periodization. Sociologists dominated the theorization of time as sequential. Time geographers were most explicit in relating time and space, mainly in micro-level analyses. How to visualize and represent time in two dimensions remained an unsettled matter; some disciplines imagined timed processes as narrow or broad (represented along an x-axis), while others analyzed them as shallow or deep (represented along a y-axis). Scholars working with timed media, such as video, may have insights into how to overcome this representational roadblock.

Type
Presidential Address
Information
Social Science History , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , Spring 2010 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew (2001) Time Matters: On Theory and Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew (2005) “The historicality of individuals.” Social Science History 29: 1–13.10.1017/S0145553200013225Google Scholar
Comaroff, John L. (1992) Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Foner, Nancy (2000) From Ellis Island to JFK: New York’s Two Great Waves of Immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Foner, Nancy (2006) “Then and now or then to now: Immigration to New York in contemporary and historical perspective.” Journal of American Ethnic History 25: 33–47.Google Scholar
Hägerstrand, Torsten (1970) “What about people in regional science?” Papers of the Regional Science Association 24: 7–21.Google Scholar
Hastrup, Kirsten (1990) “The ethnographic present: A reinvention.” Cultural Anthropology 5: 45–61.10.1525/can.1990.5.1.02a00030Google Scholar
Institute for Advanced Study, University of Minnesota (2009) “University Symposium: Time,” www.ias.umn.edu/symposiumtime.php (accessed August 24, 2009).Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri (1991) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, David (1985) The Past Is a Foreign Country. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lucassen, Leo (2005) The Immigrant Threat: The Integration of Old and New Migrants in Western Europe since 1850. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sanjek, Roger (1991) “The ethnographic present.” Man 26: 609–28.Google Scholar
Smail, Daniel L. (2008) On Deep History and the Brain. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sociological Methods and Research (1992) “Historical sociology and time” (special issue). 20, no. 4.Google Scholar
Thornton, Arland (2005) Reading History Sideways: The Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar