Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:06:12.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Internal Migration and Sectoral Shift in the Nineteenth-Century United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2021

Daniel MacDonald Open the ORCID record for Daniel MacDonald [Opens in a new window]
Daniel MacDonald*
Affiliation:
Economics Department, California State University San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the relationship between internal migration and industrialization in the United States between 1850 and 1880. We use the Linked Representative Samples from IPUMS and find significant amounts of rural-urban and urban-urban migration in New England. Rural-urban migration was mainly driven by agricultural workers shifting to manufacturing occupations. Urban-urban migration was driven by foreign-born workers in manufacturing. We argue that rural-urban migration was a significant factor in US economic development and the structural transformation from agriculture to manufacturing.

Keywords

internal migrationurbanizationindustrialization
Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 45 , Special Issue 4: Soils and Sustainability , Winter 2021 , pp. 843 - 862
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Social Science History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boustan, Leah Platt, Devin, Bunten, and Owen, Hearey (2013) “Urbanization in the United States, 1800–2000.” NBER Working Paper 19041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dublin, Thomas (1981) Women at Work: The Transformation of Work and Community in Lowell, Massachusetts, 1826–1860. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dublin, Thomas (1986) “Rural-urban migrants in industrial New England: The case of Lynn, Massachusetts, in the mid-nineteenth century.” Journal of American History 73 (3): 623–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrie, Joseph P. (1996) “A new sample of males linked from the Public Use Microdata Sample of the 1850 U.S. Federal census of population to the 1860 U.S. Federal census manuscript schedules.” Historical Methods 29 (4): 141–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrie, Joseph P. (1997) “Migration to the frontier in mid-nineteenth century America: A re-examination of Turner’s ‘safety valve.‘” Northwestern University Working Paper.Google Scholar
Ferrie, Joseph P. (2003) “How ya gonna keep ‘em down on the farm [When they’ve seen schenectedy]? Rural to urban migration in the U.S., 1850–1860.” Northwestern University Working Paper.Google Scholar
Field, Alexander James (1978) “Sectoral shift in antebellum Massachusetts: A reconsideration.” Explorations in Economic History 15: 146–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasco, Laurence (1978) “Migration and adjustment in the nineteenth-century city: Occupation, property, and household structure of native-born whites, Buffalo, New York, 1855,” in Tamata, Hateven and Maris, Vinovskis (eds.) Family and Population in Nineteenth-Century America. Princeton University Press: 154–78.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Dave, Lambert, Paul S., Zijdeman, Richard L., van Leeuwen, Marco HD, and Mass, Ineke (2018) “Microclass immobility during industrialisation in the USA and Norway.” Acta Sociologica 20 (10): 1–18.Google Scholar
Guest, Avery M. (2005) “Frontier and urban-industrial explanations of U.S. occupational mobility in the late 1800s.” Social Science Research 34: 140–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Patricia K., and Ruggles, Steven (2004) “‘Restless in the midst of their prosperity’: New evidence on the internal migration of Americans, 1850–2000.” Journal of American History 91 (3): 829–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herscovici, Steven (1998) “Migration and economic mobility: Wealth accumulation and occupational change among antebellum migrants and persisters.” Journal of Economic History 58 (4): 927–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Michael B., Doucet, Michael J., and Stern, Mark J. (1978) “Migration and the social order in Erie County, New York: 1855.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8 (4): 669–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Jason (2005) “Rural-urban migration and socioeconomic mobility in Victorian Britain.” Journal of Economic History 65 (1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Jason, and Ferrie, Joseph P. (2013) “Intergenerational occupational mobility in Great Britain and the United States since 1850.” American Economic Review 103 (4): 1109–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, Guy, Ferdinand, Rauch, and Redding, Stephen J. (2012) “Urbanization and structural transformation.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (2): 535–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, Sarah, Flood, Ronald, Goeken, Josiah, Grover, Erin, Meyer, Jose, Pacas, and Matthew, Sobek (2020) IPUMS USA: Version 10.0 [dataset]. IPUMS. https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V10.0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, Laura (2014) “Selective migration, wages, and occupational mobility in nineteenth century America.” Explorations in Economic History 53 (July): 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. (1987) “Household migration, urban growth, and industrialization: The United States, 1850–1860.” NBER Working Paper No. 2281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. (1989) “Household migration and rural settlement in the United States, 1850–1860.” Explorations in Economic History 26 (2): 190–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, James I. (2006) “Migration to the agricultural frontier and wealth accumulation, 1860–1870.” Explorations in Economic History 43 (4): 547–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, James I. (2009) “Economic opportunity or hardship? The causes of geographic mobility on the agricultural frontier, 1860–1880.” Journal of Economic History 69 (1): 238–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephan S. (1964) Poverty and Progress: Social Mobility in a Nineteenth Century City. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephan S., and Knights, Peter R. (1970) “Men in motion: Some data and speculations about urban population mobility in nineteenth-century America.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 1 (1): 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Frederick Jackson (1920) “The significance of the frontier in American history,” in Frederick Jackson Turner (ed.) The Frontier in American History. Holt: 1–38.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G. (1988a) “Migrant selectivity, urbanization, and industrial revolutions.” Population and Development Review 14 (2): 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G. (1988b) “Migration and Urbanization,” in Chenrey, H. and Srinivasan, T. N. (eds.) Handbook of Development Economics. Vol. 1. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Zipf, George K. (1946) “The P1 P2/D hypothesis: On the inter-city movement of persons.” American Sociological Review (11): 677–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar