Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:55:33.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interclass Conflict and Political Divisions among Capitalists

The Remaking of an Agrarian Capitalist Class in Mexico, 1970-75

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Dolores Trevizo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With original data from Mexico I argue that political divisions among capitalists are determined by their varying political relationships to other organized classes. I demonstrate that in 1975 a minority of agrarian capitalists formed a movement for organizational autonomy from the government to defend private property, free enterprise, and capitalism. The majority of capitalists, however, rejected this movement as “unpatriotic.” Neither the heterogeneity of the capitalists’ markets nor the various ways in which state policy impinged on their material interests explains this ideological divide. Rather, the data suggest that the agrarian capitalists’ variant experiences with peasant struggles from below (and the contingent outcomes of such struggles) significantly shaped their political agendas and, thus, their conflicts over organizational forms. Capitalist interests, I conclude, are not fixed by an iron law of profitability any more than intraclass differences are resolvable in the monologically simple manner commonly assumed. Rather, capitalist agendas emerge dialogically through the political and ideological conflicts engendered by organized challenges from below.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , spring 2003 , pp. 75 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardhan, Pranab (1982) “Agrarian class formation in India.” Journal of Peasant Studies. October: 73–94.Google Scholar
Bottomore, Tom, and Brym, Robert J., eds. (1989) The Capitalist Class: An International Study. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Google Scholar
Bowman, John R. (1985) “The politics of the market: Economic competition and the organization of capitalists.” Political Power and Social Theory 5: 35–88.Google Scholar
Brady, Robert A. (1943) Business as a System of Power. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic A. (1989) Entrepreneurs and Politics in Twentieth-Century Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Carton de Grammont, Hubert (1990) Los empresarios agrícolas y el estado: Sinaloa 1893-1984. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Google Scholar
Comisión Económica para América Latina (CEPAL) (1982) Economia Campesina y Agricultura Empresarial. Mexico City: Siglo Veintinuo Editores. Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. (1996) Mexican Politics in Transition: The Breakdown of a One-Party-Dominant Regime. San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego. Google Scholar
Domhoff, William G. (1990) The Power Elite and the State. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter. Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan (2000) “State-society relations in Mexico: Historical legacies and contemporary trends.” Latin American Research Review 35 (2): 183–203. Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan, and Gordillo, Gustavo (1989) “Between state and market: The campesinos’ quest for autonomy,” in Cornelius, Wayne A., Gentleman, Judith, and Smith, Peter H. (eds.)Mexico’s Alternative Political Futures. San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego. Google Scholar
Gamson, William A., and Meyer, David S. (1996) “Framing political opportunity,” in McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N. (eds.) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee S. (1986) State and Countryside: Development Policy and Agrarian Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar
Hall, John R. (1997) “Introduction: The reworking of class analysis,” in Hall, John R. (ed.) Reworking Class. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Haydu, Jeffrey (1998) “Two logics of class formation? Collective identities among proprietary employers, 1880-1900.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, August.Google Scholar
Hilferding, Rudolf (1981 [1910]) Finance Capital. London, Boston, and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar
Katz, Friedrich (1998) The Life and Times of Pancho Villa. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
Knight, Alan (1986) The Mexican Revolution. Vol. 1, Porfirians, Liberals, and Peasants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter, and Shalev, Michael (1979). “Strikes, industrial relations, and class conflict in capitalist societies.” British Journal of Sociology 30 (2): 164–87.Google Scholar
Martinelli, Alberto, and Chiesi, Antonio M. (1989) “Italy,” in Bottomore, Tom and Brym, Robert J. (eds.) The Capitalist Class: An International Study. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug (1996) “Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions,” in McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N. (eds.) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., eds. (1996) “Introduction.” Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel S. (1974) Peasants, Politics, and Revolution: Pressures toward Political and Social Change in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Mills, C.Wright (1956) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Offe, Claus, and Wiesenthal, Helmut (1980) “Two logics of collective action: Theoretical notes on social class and organizational form.” Political Power and Social Theory 1: 67–115.Google Scholar
Otero, Gerardo (2000) “Neoliberal reform in rural Mexico: Social structural and political dimensions.” Latin American Research Review 35 (1): 187–207.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam (1977) “Proletariat into a class: The process of class formation from Karl Kautsky’s ‘The Class Struggle’ to Recent Controversies.” Politics and Society 7: 343–401.Google Scholar
Rose, Sonya O. (1997) “Class formation and the quintessential worker,” in Hall, John R. (ed.) Reworking Class. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Roy, William G., and Parker-Gwin, Rachel R. (1999) “How many logics of collective action?” Theory and Society 28: 203–37.Google Scholar
Rubin, Jeffrey W. (1997) Decentering the Regime: Ethnicity, Radicalism, and Democracy in Juchitán, Mexico. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar
Rubio, Blanca V. (1990) “Agricultura, economia y crisis durante el periodo 1970-1982,” in Moguel, Julio (ed.)Historia de la cuestion agraria Mexicana: Los tiempos de la crisis, 1970-1982, primera parte, vol. 9a. Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores: 15–137.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Steven E. (1979) “La lucha agraria en Sonora, 1970-1976: Manipulacion, reforma y la derrota del populismo.” Revista Mexicana de Sociologia 41 (3): 1181–1232.Google Scholar
Sanderson, , Walsh, Susan R. (1984) Land Reform in Mexico: 1910-1980. New York: Academic. Google Scholar
Schmitter, Phillip (1974) “Still the century of corporatism.” Review of Politics 36 (1): 85–131.Google Scholar
Shadlen, Kenneth C. (2000) “Neoliberalism, corporatism, and small business political activism in contemporary Mexico.” Latin American Research Review 35 (2): 73–106.Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret R. (1997) “Deconstructing and reconstructing class formation theory: Narrativity, relational analysis, and social theory,” in Hall, John R. (ed.) Reworking Class. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang (1992) “Inclusion and secession: Questions on the boundaries of associative democracy.”Politics and Society 20 (4):513–20.Google Scholar
Sweezy, Paul M. (1942) The Theory of Capitalist Development. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Tirado, Ricardo (1982) “Las organizaciones empresariales del sector agropecuario en Mexico: La CNPP y la CNG. ”Paper prepared for the Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).Google Scholar
Trevizo, Dolores (2002) “Dispersed Communist networks and grassroots leadership of peasant revolts in Mexico.” Sociological Perspectives 45:283–315. Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
Womack, John Jr. (1986) “The Mexican Revolution, 1910-1920,” in Bethell, Leslie (ed.) The Cambridge History of Latin America. Vol. 5, c. 1870 to 1930. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Maurice (1984) The Civil Wars in Chile, or, The Bourgeois Revolutions that Never Were. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar