Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:36:14.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrial Structure, Union Strategy, and Strike Activity in American Bituminous Coal Mining, 1881-1894

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Jörg Rössel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The goal of this article is to describe and explain the specific strike pattern of American bituminous coal miners in the last part of the nineteenth century (between 1881 and 1894).The central thesis is that the evolution of strike patterns in bituminous coal mining differed substantially from the development of strike patterns in other industries during this period. According to scholars like Gerald Friedman (1988) and Kim Voss (1993), the evolution of the American labor movement until 1886 was strongly determined by the Knights of Labor’s strategy of inclusive unionism, which sought to increase worker power through solidarity and broad-based strikes. As this strategy proved unsuccessful—especially in 1886—American labor unions later conducted a different type of walkout: planned, small strikes of strategically located, skilled workers, which were more successful.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , Spring 2002 , pp. 1 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H., and Nelson, Forrest D. (1984) Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Amsden, Jon, and Brier, Stephen (1977) “Coal miners on strike: The transformation of strike demands and the formation of a national union.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7 : 583–616.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, Orley, and Johnson, George E. (1969) “Bargaining theory, trade unions and industrial strike activity.” American Economic Review 59: 35–49.Google Scholar
Blatz, Perry K. (1994) Democratic Miners: Work and Labor Relations in the Anthracite Coal Industry, 1875-1925. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, John (1989) Capitalist Collective Action: Competition, Cooperation and Conflict in the Coal Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bunting, David (1986) The Rise of Large American Corporations, 1889-1919. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Corbin, David Allan (1981) Life, Work and Rebellion in the Coal Fields: The Southern West Virginia Miners, 1880-1922. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Cotkin, George B. (1978) “Strikebreakers, evictions and violence: Industrial conflict in the Hocking Valley, 1884-1885.” Ohio History 87: 140–50.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. K. (1981) Strikes in the United States, 1881-1974. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fishback, Price V. (1992) Soft Coal, Hard Choices: The Economic Welfare of Bituminous Coal Miners, 1890-1930. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franzosi, Roberto (1995) The Puzzle of Strikes: Class and State Strategies in Postwar Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Gerald (1988) “Strike success and union ideology: The United States and France, 1880-1914.” Journal of Economic History 48: 1–25.Google Scholar
Garlock, Jonathan (1974) A Structural Analysis of the Knights of Labor. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
Graebner, William (1974) “Great expectations: The search for order in bituminous coal, 1890-1917.” Business History Review 68: 49–72.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Walton H., and Wright, Helen R. (1925) The Case of Bituminous Coal. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kmenta, Jan (1997) Elements of Econometrics (2d ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Levstik, Frank R. (1976) “The Hocking Valley miners’ strike, 1884-1885: A search for order.” Old Northwest 2: 55–65.Google Scholar
Lewis, Ronald L. (1987) Black coal miners in America. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Long, Priscilla (1989) Where the Sun Never Shines: A History of America’s Bloody Coal Industry. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Mcbride, John (1887) “Coal Miners,” in McNeill, George E. (ed.) The Labor Movement: The Problem of Today. Boston: Bridgman: 241–67.Google Scholar
Nash, Michael (1982) Conflict and Accommodation: Coal Miners, Steel Workers and Socialism, 1890-1920. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Pyndick, Robert S., and Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1991) Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Bruno (1978) When Workers Fight: The Politics of Industrial Relations in the Progressive Era, 1898-1916. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Joshua (1998) “Strikebreaking and the labor market in the United States, 1881-1894.” Journal of Economic History 58: 183–205.Google Scholar
Rössel, Jörg (1998) “Der effekt der organisation: Mobilisierung und erfolg von challenging groups am beispiel amerikanischer kohlenbergarbeiterstreiks 1881-1894.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 39: 28–54.Google Scholar
Rössel, Jörg (1999) “Warum soziale konflikte gewaltsam werden: Streiks und gewalt im amerikanischen kohlenbergbau.”Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 51: 439–68.Google Scholar
Roy, Andrew (1970 [1905]) A History of the Coal Miners of the United States. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Sayrs, Lois W. (1989) Pooled Time Series Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Shifflett, Crandall A. (1991) Coal Towns: Life, Work, and Culture in Company Towns of Southern Appalachia, 1880-1960. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Stearns, Peter (1974) “Measuring the evolution of strike movements.” International Review of Social History 19: 1–27.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A. (1985) “Regression in space and time: A statistical essay.” American Journal of Political Science 29: 914–47.Google Scholar
Suffern, Arthur E. (1926) The American Coal Miners’ Struggle for Industrial Status: A Study of the Evolution of Organized Relations and Industrial Principles in the Coal Industry. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Suffern, Arthur E. (1976 [1915]) Conciliation and Arbitration in the Coal Industry of America. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office (1882) Report on the Mining Industries of the United States. Tenth Census of the United States (1880). Vol. 15. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office (1892) Report on Mineral Industries in the United States at the 11th Census (1889). Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office (1905) Special Reports: Mines and Quarries 1902. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Labor (1888) Third Annual Report: Strikes and Lockouts, Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Labor (1896) Tenth Annual Report: Strikes and Lockouts. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey (1901) Mineral Resources of the United States (1900). Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Voss, Kim (1993) The Making of American Exceptionalism: The Knights of Labor and Class Formation in the Nineteenth Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Robert David, and Rogers, William Warren (1965) Labor Revolt in Alabama: The Great Strike of 1894. University: University of Alabama.Google Scholar
Ware, Norman J. (1964) The Labor Movement in the United States, 1860-1890: A Study in Democracy. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar