Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:45:44.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender, Race, and Class

Bridging the Language-Structure Divide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Evelyn Nakano Glenn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For social historians and historical sociologists working in the interdisciplinary fields of ethnic studies and women's studies, the challenges posed by poststructuralism are neither purely intellectual matters nor disciplinary quibbles. Rather, a concern with “rescuing political economy” from being washed away by the tide of poststructuralism is impelled by larger political commitments that transcend the academy.

Unlike mainstream disciplines, these fields historically have been connected to social movements dedicated to empowering people marginalized by reason of race, class, and/or gender. Poststructuralism has become a thorny issue in these fields: Many social science- and political economy-oriented scholars have come to feel, whether justifiably or not, that these fields are being “taken over” by literary, film, and cultural studies scholars.

Type
A Roundtable on Gender, Race, Class, Culture, and Politics: Where Do We Go from Here?
Information
Social Science History , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , Spring 1998 , pp. 29 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1998

References

Almaguer, Tomas (1994) Racial Faultlines: The Historical Origins of White Supremacy in California. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill (1993) “Setting our own agenda.” Black Scholar 23: 52–55.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. (1993) “Theorizing gender.” Theory and Society 22: 597–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fields, Barbara J. (1982) “Ideology and race in American history,” in MacPherson, James and Morgan Kousser, M. (eds.) Region, Race, and Reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press: 143–78.Google Scholar
Fischer, Claude S., Hout, Michael, Jankowski, Martin Sanchez, Lucas, Samuel R., Swidler, Ann, and Voss, Kim (1996) Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, Evelyn Nakano (1992) “From servitude to service work: Historical continuities in the racial division of paid reproductive labor.” Signs 18:1–43.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda (1994) Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Haney Lopez, Ian F. (1995) “The social construction of race,” in Delgado, Richard (ed.) Critical Race Theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 191–203.Google Scholar
Harris, Angela (1994) “Foreword: The jurisprudence of reconstruction.” California Law Review 82: 741–85.Google Scholar
Harris, Cheryl I. (1993) “Whiteness as property.” Harvard Law Review 106:1707–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnstein, Richard, and Murray, Charles (1994) The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Laslett, Barbara, and Brenner, Johanna (1989) “Gender and social reproduction: Historical perspectives.” Annual Review of Sociology 15: 381–404.Google Scholar
Lorber, Judith (1994) The Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McKee, James B. (1993) Sociology and the Race Problem: The Failure of a Perspective. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Omi, Michael, and Winant, Howard (1994) Racial Formation in America. 2d ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pascoe, Peggy (1991) “Race, gender, and intercultural relations: The case of interracial marriage.” Frontiers 12: 5–18.Google Scholar
Pascoe, Peggy (1996) “Miscegenation law, court cases, and ideologies of ‘race’ in twentieth-century America.” Journal of American History 83: 44–69.Google Scholar
Rose, Sonya (1995) “Class formation and the quintessential worker.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. (1986) “Gender: A useful category of historical analysis.” American Historical Review 91:1053–75.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. (1993) “Toward a post-structuralist rhetoric for labor history,” in Berlanstein, Lenard R. (ed.) Rethinking Labor History. Urbana: University of Illinois Press: 15–38.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Jon Michael (1993) “Trends of opposition to multiculturalism.” Black Scholar 23: 2–5.Google Scholar
Toro, Luis (1994) “Rethinking race and ethnicity: A critique of the Hispanic classification in OMB Directive #15.” Paper given at the Law and Identity Workshop, Boalt Law School, University of California, Berkeley, September.Google Scholar
Turbin, Carole (1994) “Redefining the American working class: Consumption appearance and the changing language of class.” Paper presented at the Social Science History Association meeting, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Wright, Lawrence (1994) “One drop of blood.” New Yorker 25 July: 46–55.Google Scholar