Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:20:31.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fordism and Positivism in U.S. Sociology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Val Burris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section: Commentary on The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others
Information
Social Science History , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , Spring 2007 , pp. 93 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althusser, Louis (1969) For Marx. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Brenner, Robert, and Glick, Mark (1991) “The regulation approach: Theory and history.” New Left Review, no. 188: 45–119.Google Scholar
Burris, Val (2004) “The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks.” American Sociological Review 69: 239–64.Google Scholar
Grant, Linda, Ward, Kathryn B., and Lan Rong, Xue (1987) “Is there an association between gender and methods in sociological research?” American Sociological Review 52: 856–62.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob (1990) “Regulation theories: Retrospect and prospect.” Economy and Society 19: 153–216.Google Scholar
Keat, Russell (1981) The Politics of Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Little, Daniel (1991) Varieties of Social Explanation. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg (1971 [1922]) History and Class Consciousness. London: Merlin.Google Scholar
Porpora, Douglas (2001) “Do realists run regressions?” in Potter, Garry and Lopez, Jose (eds.) After Postmodernism? Critical Realism. London: Continuum: 260–68.Google Scholar
Pratschke, Jonathan (2003) “Realistic models? Critical realism and statistical models in the social sciences.” Philosophica 71: 13–35.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, Gareth (1971) “The Marxism of the early Lukács: An evaluation.” New Left Review, no. 70: 27–64.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (2005a) “Positivism and its others in the social sciences,” in Steinmetz, George (ed.) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 1–56.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (2005b) “Scientific authority and the transition to post-Fordism: The plausibility of positivism in U.S. sociology since 1945,” in Steinmetz, George (ed.) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 275–323.Google Scholar