Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:03:00.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Flexible House: The Housing Backlog and the Persistence of Lodging, 1891–1951

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Richard Harris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Lodging was once common. In 1900 about one-quarter of U.S. households contained a lodger or lodging family. Almost as many more took one in at some point in the life of the household. Since then, rising incomes have enabled more people to maintain their own household. Today, lodging is quite rare and is confined largely to the poor.

A good deal has been written about lodging, mostly by social historians concerned with its implications for daily life. We have been told that lodiging was part of the immigrant experience, that it helped even out household income over the life cycle, that it augmented the clout of women within the household, and that in larger cities it supported a subculture among single men and women (Modell and Hareven 1973).

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , Spring 1994 , pp. 31 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, E. (1939) The Tenements of Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bacher, J. (1985) “Keeping to the private market: The evolution of Canadian housing policy.” Ph.D. diss., McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.Google Scholar
Bodnar, J., Simon, R., and Weber, M. P. (1982) Lives of Their Own: Blacks, Italians, and Poles in Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Bose, C. E. (1984) “Household resources and United States women's work: Factors affecting gainful employment at the turn of the century.” American Sociological Review 49: 474–90.Google Scholar
Bourne, L. S. (1981) The Geography of Housing. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Bradbury, B. (1984) “Pigs, cows and boarders: Non-wage forms of survival among Montreal families, 1861–1891.” Labour/Le Travail 14: 9–46.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. (1966) Population Change and Business Cycles. Bulletin Series No. 91. Urbana: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Canada. Advisory Committee on Reconstruction (1944) Final Report of the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Planning. Ottawa: King's Printer.Google Scholar
Canada. Board of Enquiry into the Cost of Living (1914) Report. Vol. 1. Ottawa: King's Printer.Google Scholar
Canada. Department of Labour (1904,1908) Labour Gazette.Google Scholar
Canada. Dominion Bureau of Statistics (1901) 1901 Census. Vol. 1, Table 7. Ottawa: Dominion Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Canada. Dominion Bureau of Statistics (1911) 1911 Census. Vol. 1, Table 11. Ottawa: Dominion Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Canada. Dominion Bureau of Statistics (1921) 1921 Census. Vol. 3, Tables 4, 17. Ottawa: Dominion Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Canada. Dominion Bureau of Statistics (1931) 1931 Census. Vol. 5, Tables 58, 59, 61, 67, 70. Ottawa: Dominion Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Canada. Dominion Bureau of Statistics (1941) 1941 Census. Vol. 5, Table 4. Ottawa: Dominion Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Canada. Dominion Bureau of Statistics (1951) 1951 Census. Vol. 3. Ottawa: Dominion Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Careless, M. (1984) Toronto to 1918: An Illustrated History. Toronto: Lorimer.Google Scholar
Carver, H. (1946) How Much Housing Does Greater Toronto Need? Toronto: Metropolitan Housing Research Project.Google Scholar
Cavan, R. S., and Rank, K. H. (1938) The Family and the Depression: A Study of One Hundred Chicago Families. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
City of Toronto (1942) Report of the Committee to Enquire into Housing Conditions in the Several Areas of the City of Toronto. Toronto: City of Toronto.Google Scholar
Duncan, L. (1942) Report on Housing for the City of Toronto. Toronto: City of Toronto.Google Scholar
Evening Telegram [Toronto] (1911).Google Scholar
Firestone, O. J. (1951) Residential Real Estate in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Glick, P. (1947) “The family cycle.” American Sociological Review 12: 164–74.Google Scholar
Globe [Toronto] (1921).Google Scholar
Globe and Mail [Toronto] (1942-43,1945-48,1951).Google Scholar
Gottlieb, M. (1976) Long Swings in Urban Development. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Guy, D. (1970) “An analysis of a filtering hypothesis in urban housing markets: An empirical test in Kankakee, Illinois.” Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1990) “Household work strategies and suburban homeownership in Toronto, 1899–1913.” Environment and Planning. D: Society and Space 8: 97–121.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1991) “Self-building in the urban housing market.” Economic Geography 67: 1–21.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1992) “The end justified the means: Boarding and rooming in a city of homes, 1890–1951.” Journal of Social History 26: 331–58.Google Scholar
Harris, R., and Moffat, B. (1986) “How reliable is the modern City Directory?” Canadian Geographer 30:154–58.Google Scholar
Hoover, G. A. (1985) “Supplemental family income sources: Ethnic differences in nineteenth century industrial America.” Social Science History 9: 293–306.Google Scholar
Katz, M. (1975) The People of Hamilton, Canada West: Family and Class in a Mid-nineteenth Century City. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lemon, J. (1985) Toronto since 1918. Toronto: Lorimer.Google Scholar
Lubove, R. (1962) The Progressives and the Slums. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
MacPherson, M., and Holdsworth, D. (1990) “The impact of the recession on people,” in Kerr, D. and Holdsworth, D. (eds.) Historical Atlas of Canada. Vol. 3, Addressing the Twentieth Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press: Plate 41.Google Scholar
May, M. (1982) “The historical problem of the family wage: The Ford Motor Company and the five dollar day.” Feminist Studies 8: 399–424.Google Scholar
Medjuck, S. (1986) “The social consequences of economic cycles on nineteenth century households and family life: The case of Moncton, New Brunswick, 1851–1871.” Social Indicators Research 18: 233–61.Google Scholar
Might and Co. (1933) Toronto City Directory. Toronto: Might and Co.Google Scholar
Miron, J. (1988) Housing in postwar Canada: Demographic change, household formation, and housing demand. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen University Press.Google Scholar
Modell, J., and Hareven, T. (1973) “Urbanisation and the malleable household.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 35: 467–79.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. (1936) “Social characteristics of cities. III. Family life.” Public Management 18: 71–76.Google Scholar
Ontario (1919) Report of the Ontario Housing Committee. Toronto: King's Printer.Google Scholar
Ontario (1934) Report of the Lieutenant-Governor's Committee on Housing Conditions in Toronto. Toronto: King's Printer.Google Scholar
Parr, J. (1990) The Gender of Breadwinners: Women, Men, and Change in Two Industrial Towns, 1880–1950. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Piva, M. (1979) The Condition of the Working Class in Toronto, 1900–1921. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, B. B. (1948) “Some aspects of Canadian housing.” Ph.D. diss., Duke University.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S., and Lazersfeld, P. (1937) Research Memorandum on the Family in the Depression. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Toronto Daily Star (1921).Google Scholar
Tygiel, J. (1977) “Workingmen in San Francisco, 1880–1901.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce (1937) Financial Survey of Urban Housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor (1903) Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor. Pt. 1, Table IN. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1930) Fifteenth Census of the United States. Vol. 6, Table 32. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1940) Sixteenth Census of the United States. Population and Housing: Families: General Characteristics. Table 10. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1947) Marital Status of the Civilian Population and of Heads of Families: June, 1946. Series P-S, No. 16. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1950) Seventeenth Census of the United States. Vol. 4, Pt. 2, Nos. 2A, 2B. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Weaver, J. (1987) “The North American apartment building as a matter of business and an expression of culture: A survey and case study.” Planning Perspectives 2: 27–52.Google Scholar
Wecter, D. (1948) The Age of the Great Depression, 1929–1941. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
Zucchi, J. E. (1985) “Italian hometown settlements and the development of an Italian community in Toronto, 1875–1935,” in Harney, R. (ed.) Gathering Place: Peoples and Neighbourhoods of Toronto, 1834–1945. Toronto: University of Toronto Press: 121–46.Google Scholar