Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:49:46.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Eclectic Center of the New Institutionalism

Axes of Analysis in Comparative Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Philip Ethington  and
Eileen McDonagh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This special section of Social Science History launches a series of five articles illustrative of what we believe is an eclectic center in the development of historical studies of institutions and policies, often termed the “new institutionalism.” The new institutionalism emerged in the early 1980s in reaction to “a long season in which social forces and processes were the predominant topics of study” (Orren and Skowronek 1986). While the precise role of institutions varies according to the practitioner, hallmarks of the new institutionalism include a portrayal of institutions as semiautonomous actors; a contextualization of institutions within sociohistorical processes (and vice versa); a recognition of inefficiency, contingency, and accident in history; and a recognition of the relative autonomy of ideas and symbolic action in historical development (March and Olsen 1984, 1989; Krasner 1984; Smith 1988; Katznelson 1992). As is expected of new paradigms, the entry of the new institutionalism into the intellectual community has been marked by an array of polemics against its predecessors, “old” schools defined by “old institutionalism,” behaviorism, and structural functionalism. It has also generated a wave of spirited counterattacks (Mitchell 1991; Bendix et al. 1992; Ethington and McDonagh forthcoming).

Type
Special Section: Institutions and Institutionalism
Information
Social Science History , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , Winter 1995 , pp. 467 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bendix, John, Oilman, Bertell, and Mitchell, Timothy (1992) “Going beyond the state?” American Political Science Review 86: 1007-21.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel (1968) “Social institutions,” in Sills, David L. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 14. New York: Macmillan: 409-20.Google Scholar
Ethington, Philip J., and McDonagh, Eileen L., eds. (forthcoming) “Institutions and institutionalism in historical social science: A panel of perspectives.” Polity.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1987) “Institutionalism,” in Bogdanor, Vernon (ed.) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Institutions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hayes, Samuel P. (1964) “The politics of reform in municipal government in the Progressive Era.” Pacific Northwest Quarterly 55: 157-69.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira (1992) “The state to the rescue? Political science and history reconnect.” Social Research 59: 719-37.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1984) “Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics.” Comparative Politics 23: 223-46.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. (1984) “The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life.” American Political Science Review 78: 734-49.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Terrence J., ed. (1995) The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy (1991) “The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics.” American Political Science Review 85: 77–96.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen (1991) Belated Feudalism: Labor, the Law, and Liberal Development in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen, eds. (1986) “Editors’ preface.” Studies in American Political Development 1:1.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen (1994) “Beyond the iconography of order: Notes for a ‘new institutionalism,'“ in Dodd, Lawrence and Jillson, Calvin (eds.) The Dynamics of American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview: 311-30.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. (1988) “Political jurisprudence, the ‘new institutionalism,’ and the future of public law.” American Political Science Review 82: 89–108.Google Scholar