No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Domestic Labor as a Life-Course Event: The Effects of Ethnicity in Turn-of-the-Century America
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
Extract
Much of the historical literature on working women has emphasized the extent to which employment varied along racial and ethnic lines. Domestic service in turn-of-the-century America attracted by far the largest proportion of employed women, and female domestics tended to belong to specific ethnic and racial groups. Immigrant domestics, most often Irish, Scandinavian, and German, were generally from areas of the so-called European marriage pattern, and employment for these women was normally temporary and limited to the life-course phase preceding marriage. Domestic work of this sort was a product of small-scale rural economies and was associated with late marriage. It was further marked by shared productive activity among all household members and by loosely defined social roles. In contrast to immigrants and native-born white servants, black domestics were older and far more likely to combine wage labor with marriage and motherhood. Their greater proclivity for day work and separate residential patterns, although clearly southern in origin, was replicated in northern cities and represented a trend toward the application of industrial work rules to domestic service (Dudden 1983). In other words, immigrant domestics seemed to compose the informal, “help” component of the domestic labor force, while black women, although marginalized and subject to discrimination in employment, appeared to represent an expanding, semiprofessionalized segment of the nation’s servant pool.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Social Science History Association 1991
References
Caroli, B. B., and Kessner, T. (1978) “New immigrant women at work: Italians and Jews in New York City, 1880-1905.” Journal of Ethnic Studies 5: 19–31.Google Scholar
Conk, M. A. (1981) “Accuracy, efficiency, and bias: The interpretation of women’s work in the U.S. census of occupations, 1890-1940.” Historical Methods 14: 65–72.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, P. (1978) “A method of decomposing a difference between two rates into several components.” Demography 15: 99–112.Google Scholar
Diner, H. R. (1983) Erin’s Daughters in America: Irish Immigrant Women in the Nineteenth Century. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dudden, F. (1983) Serving Women: Household Service in Nineteenth-Century America. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. (1943) Comparative Occupation Statistics for the United States, 1870 to 1940. Report prepared for the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Hajnal, J. (1965) “European marriage patterns in perspective,” in Glass, D. V. and Eversley, D. E. V. (eds.) Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography. Chicago: Aldine: 101-43.Google Scholar
Hajnal, J. (1982) “Two kinds of preindustrial household formation systems.” Population and Development Review 8: 449-94.Google Scholar
Hareven, T. (1982) Family Time and Industrial Time: The Relationship between the Family and Work in a New England Industrial Community. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (1929) Women in Gainful Occupations, 1870-1920. Monograph prepared for the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Jones, J. (1985) Labor of Love, Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work, and the Family from Slavery to the Present. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Katzman, D. (1978) Seven Days a Week: Women and Domestic Service in Industrializing America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kessler-Harris, A. (1982) Out to Work: A History of Wage-earning Women in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, M., and Ruggles, S. (1990) “American immigration, fertility, and race suicide at the turn of the century.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 20: 347-69.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, E. (1955) “Components of a difference between two rates.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 50: 1168-94.Google Scholar
Mitterauer, M. (1985) “Gesindedienst und Jugendphase im europäischen Vergleich.” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 11: 177–204.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1970) The Female Labor Force in the United States: Demographic and Economic Factors Governing Its Growth and Changing Composition. Population Monograph Series no. 5. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
Smith, J. (1978) “Our own kind: Family and community networks in Providence.” Radical History Review 17: 99–120.Google Scholar
Strong, M., Preston, S., Miller, A. R., Hereward, M., Lentzner, H. R., Seaman, J. R., and Williams, H.C. (1989) User’s Guide: Public Use Sample, 1910 United States Census of Population. Philadelphia: n.d.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1907) Statistics of Women at Work. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate (1911) Reports of the Immigration Commission: Occupations of the First and Second Generations of Immigrants in the United States. 61 st Cong., 2d sess.Google Scholar
Weiner, L. W. (1985) From Working Girl to Working Mother: The Female Labor Force in the United States, 1820-1980. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Willcox, Walter F., ed. (1929) International Migrations, vol. 1. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Yans-McLaughlin, V. (1971) Family and Community: Italian Immigrants in Buffalo, 1880-1930. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar